College aantekeningen
International Human rights law week 5 notes
- Instelling
- Universiteit Van Amsterdam (UvA)
International Human rights law week 5 notes
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 2 van de 7 pagina's
Voorbeeld 2 van de 7 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
W5: Regional systems –Europe- Non-retrogression: related to progressive realization of rights
The term means that a state cannot go back in the realization of her rights (only
up)
- Justiciability = the ability of an independent body to provide a remedy
- Core content of a right= is the absolute minimum that states should always
guarantee (no matter what their social/economic development is, this cannot be
limited)
- ESC rights can also apply extraterritorially
- ESC rights can be limited according to art 4 ICESCR
European Union- Human Rights
Freedoms established to facilitated the economic cooperation
Now: migration laws, international crimes laws,..
Art 2 TEU: the basis for what the EU stands for (respect for human rights and
human dignity)
Art 3 TEU: The EU’s goals (to promote peace, to facilitate the area of freedom)
Art 6 TEU: Sets out the human rights policy of the EU;
- Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union has the same legal value as the
Treaties
- The EU shall accede the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights
and Fundamental Freedoms
- The constitutional traditions shall be guaranteed by the European Convention for the
Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU
- Legally binding since the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty
- All categories of rights: civil, cultural, political, social, economical
- New rights: protection of personal date, freedom to conduct a business, ..
Charter- scope- art 51
- The institutions of the Union are obliged to respect the EU legislations
- The member states but only when they are implementing Union law
- The Charter does not establish any new power or modify powers and task defined by
the Treaties
Charter- limitations- art 52 (1)
- Limitations such be provided by law, respect the essence of the rights, be
proportionate, be necessary and meet objectives of general interest
Council of Europe Instruments
- After the WOII
1. Convention on the Protection of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms (= European
Convention of Human Rights) + Protocols
European Court of Human Rights (judges from each MS)
2. European Social Charter
, European Committee of Social Rights
3. Treaties on torture, minorities,…
Procedures European Court of HR
- State complaints possible (states file a complaint against each other), art. 33
- Individual complaints (complaints of a citizen of a MS), art. 34
Admissibility criteria: Victim requirement (no action popularis), exhaustion of
local remedies, substance not similar to other case, significant disadvantage,
manifestly well-founded (clear-cut violations according to existing case law)
- ECHR consisted of chambers:
Admissibility; single judge or chamber of 3 judges
Merits; chamber of 7 judges and/or Grand Chamber of 17 judges
- First: friendly settlement+ interim measures
- Final judgements are binding
- Follow up by Committee or Ministers (check up after the decision whether the State
has done what is supposed to do)
Interaction ECourtHR <-> CoJ EU (only Commission – MS or MS-MS)
- CoJ EU (Luxembourg) deals with:
Measures by EU institutions, measures by MS only when they act within the scope if
EU law
- ECHR (Strasbourg
ECHR
- A lot of workload for the Court
- New human rights issues (eg assisted suicide, same sex marriage, abortion,
environmental concerns etc)
-
Interpretation ECHR
- VCLT art. 31-33
- Dynamic interpretation- living instrument (= the rights have to be interpreted in present
day conditions!) (Case of Tyrer v UK)
- Effectiveness (Case of Airey v Ireland)
Positive obligations doctrine
- Art 1 ECHR (eg Change legislation, provide actual protection,..)
Margin of appreciation doctrine
- Subsidiary role of European Court
- Limitation clauses (8-11 ECHR) – 3 step test
Provided by law
Legitimate aim
Necessary in democratic society (Pressing social need+ proportionate) – here can
the Court refer to the margin of appreciation of the MS
- Interference IS NOT THE SAME as violation
- Protocol 15 (2013)- art 1 (not yet in force)
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper niki1994. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 48072 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen