100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Summary Economics of Monetary Integration (2021/2022) €5,49   In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Summary Economics of Monetary Integration (2021/2022)

 61 keer bekeken  2 keer verkocht
  • Vak
  • Instelling
  • Boek

Complete summary of the course Economics of Monetary Integration. This course is taught by Professor M. Maes and this summary was written in 2021/2022. (BBA KU Leuven)

Voorbeeld 4 van de 35  pagina's

  • Nee
  • Onbekend
  • 1 augustus 2022
  • 35
  • 2021/2022
  • Samenvatting
avatar-seller
Economics of Monetary Union

Chapter 1: The Costs of a Common Currency

Introduction
 What a country loses when it enters a Monetary Union
- It loses the ability to conduct a national monetary policy (to deal with asymmetric shocks)
- Inability to stabilize national output in a Monetary Union
- Inability to control national interest rate (+ Level of investment)
- Loss of control leads to vulnerability of national governments to liquidity crises
- Differences in labor market institutions between member states leads to inequality
- Differences in legal systems between member states also leads to inequality (+ Costs)

 Monetary Union (MU)
= Set of countries that have abandoned their national currencies to use a common currency,
controlled by one, common Central Bank

1.1 Shifts in Demand
 Based on Mundell-Fleming Model
- Robert Mundell (1961): Theory of Optimum Currency Areas
- Assume two countries: France + Germany
- Symmetric shock = Affects all regions/countries in the same manner
- Asymmetric shock = Change in economic conditions that affects different countries in a
different way

 In case of a symmetric shock
- Common central bank in MU can deal with these kind of shocks
- Common policy stabilizes both German + French economy
- MU (+ common policy) is now more attractive than different monetary policy
- Better to coordinate policies in case of a symmetric shock

 In case of an asymmetric shock
- Permanent shock ( Due to changes in consumer preferences)
- Increase in aggregate demand in Germany
- Decrease in aggregate demand in France
- Common CB of MU can’t deal with this issue ( Conflicting desires of member states)
- Monetary independency is now more attractive compared to MU
- Example: Reunification of East and West Germany in 1989 ( Restrictive monetary policy)




Symmetric shock Asymmetric shock

, MU can be costly, unless there is
1. Wage flexibility
- Unemployment rises in France and decreases nominal wages ( Recession in France)
- Aggregate supply in France shifts downwards ( Labor demand > Labor supply)
- Excess demand for labor in Germany pushes up the nominal wages
- In France, price of output declines and makes products more competitive
- The opposite happens in Germany and makes products less competitive ( More costly)
- This shift in demand is called the automatic adjustment process




2. Labor mobility
- French unemployed move to Germany
- Solves unemployment problems in France and excess demand for labor in Germany
- Very limited in Europe ( Wages are still very rigid)
- Primarily on the level of high skilled worked

 When not in a MU
- France applies expansionary monetary policy and reduces interest rate
- This stimulates private investment and net export ( Aggregate demand shifts to the right)
- Germany adopts a restrictive monetary policy and raises interest rate
- This decreases private investment and lowers competitivity of Germany

,1.2 Monetary independence and government budgets
 When countries join a MU, it reduces the capacity to finance budget deficits
- Countries have no control over monetary policy ( Controlled by CB)
- National governments can no more guarantee 100% payback of all debts
- Countries become more vulnerable to distrust of investors

 UK scenario
- Suppose investors fear default of UK government ( UK government bonds are being sold)
- Supply of bonds increases  Price decreases and interest rate increases
- Proceeds of sales are being traded in the forex market  Pound depreciates
- UK money stock remains on the same level ( Only price of the currency changes)
- This will not lead to any liquidity problems in the UK

 Spanish scenario
- Investors fear default of Spanish government ( Spanish government bonds are sold)
- Interest rate increases (due to larger supply of bonds)
- Proceeds of these sales are reinvested in other Eurozone assets
- Spanish money stock declines + lower liquidity in Spain
- No floating exchange rate to counter this issue ( Value of Euro is fixed for all members)
- Leads to liquidity crisis  Spanish government can’t guarantee 100% payback of bonds
- Liquidity crisis can turn into a solvency crisis

1.3 Asymmetric shocks and debt dynamics
- Negative shock in France increases budget deficit in France
- Positive shock in Germany increases budget surplus in Germany
- If markets lose trust in solvency of French government  Asymmetric shock is amplified

 Investors sell French government bonds
- Causes increase in the interest rate
- Causes liquidity crisis in France
- Lower C + I in France  AD moves left

 Investors buy German government bonds
- Interest rate declines in Germany
- More C + I in Germany  AD moves right

 Asymmetric shock is amplified

 Shouldn’t interest rates be the same in a MU?
- Yes, for short-term interest rate set by ECB
- Not for interest rates on long-term government bonds
- Long-term government bonds contain a risk premium ( Based on risk of default)

 Covid-19 Pandemic also caused an asymmetric shock

, 1.4 Booms and busts in a MU ( Temporary asymmetric shocks)
 2 possible scenarios in a MU:
1) Investors remain trust in French government
- Investors are willing to buy extra French bonds
- Interest rate remains unchanged
- Investors buy less German government bonds
- Capital market  Stabilizing role

2) Investors lose trust in French government
- Investors sell French government bonds
- Investors buy German government bonds
- Interest rate increases in France and decreases in Germany
- Capital market  Destabilizing role

1.5 Monetary and budgetary union
 MU’s can be fragile
- Asymmetric shocks  Adjustment problems, unless there is wage flexibility/labor mobility
- Adjustment problems are even worse if MU-members have low liquidity/solvency

 Costs of a MU can be reduced by
- Unlimited liquidity support for bondholders by the CB ( This is not attainable in practice)
- A budgetary union ( Further financial integration/participation between member states)

 Budgetary union
1) Insurance mechanism with ex-post transfers
- Automatic stabilization without a deficit in France or surplus in Germany
- Redistribution of tax revenues on European level  “Consumption smoothing”
- Extra tax revenues in Germany are used to finance unemployment expenditures in France
- Moral hazard  These transfers reduce competitiveness and create political resistance
- Permanent labor market differences between countries are the result of different labor
market policies and institutions ( Related to design of the labor market)

2) Provides protection against a liquidity crisis
- European centralized government that issues European bonds ( In a budgetary union)
- This eliminates capital movement from one bond market to another
- Eliminates all possible future liquidity crises of member states
- Requires political unification and transfer of power/sovereignty to European level
- Very hard to achieve in practice ( No real political willingness from member states)

 MU without a budgetary union is an incomplete MU
- Monetary union + budgetary union  Full MU
- USA is a better example of a full MU

1.6 Private insurance systems
- Budgetary union  Public insurance scheme (against liquidity crises)
- Capital market union  Private insurance scheme (against liquidity crises)

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper alexanderbollen. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €5,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 75323 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€5,49  2x  verkocht
  • (0)
  Kopen