International Political Economy
Dr Giuseppe - Year 2: Block 2
,1. Comment
3 December 2020 at 12:34:37
How politics and economy shape
one another
2. Comment
3 December 2020 at 12:33:54
Economics: study of production,
distribution, and consumption of
scarce resources
3. Comment
3 December 2020 at 12:42:59
Focus on material benefits/
losses, lesser importance of
ideas Part 1 - Economic Approaches
4. Comment
3 December 2020 at 12:45:40 1 2 International political economy: politics of economic flows across borders
Believed that idea emerged only • Political decisions have heterogenous consequences
after Great Recession (08/09) • All states benefit from trade, but unequally
- Just like Marxism emerged • Political battle between winners and losers of trade
during inequality • Political decisions usually serve self-interest of politicians
- Although idea may just have 3 • People usually act rationally
gotten popular due to greater
suffrage (?) 4 5 Keynesian economics: society benefits when government engages to counter cyclical fiscal policy
5. Comment 6 Economic approaches:
3 December 2020 at 12:45:22 • Mercantilism:
E.g. pours money into economy • State-focused
during recession • States manipulate economy to maximize power
• National power is zero-sum, based on economic power
6. Comment • Prescription: economy should be controlled
3 December 2020 at 13:26:06
7 • Positive trade balance (only) → acquire wealth from abroad
Each explains different things,
• Some economic activity is more valuable (e.g. manufactured goods > natural resources)
but not everything 8 • Liberalism:
9 • Individual-focused
7. Comment
• Economic activity aims to enrich individuals
3 December 2020 at 12:55:25
• Focus on welfare consequences
Back in the day, more exports =
• Prescription: economy should not be controlled
more income
• All trade is good (mutual gains from trade, comparative advantage)
10 • Market-based resource allocation
8. Comment
11 • State should: enforce property rights/contracts + resolve market failures
3 December 2020 at 13:25:28
• Marxism:
Key thinker: Adam Smith
• Class-focused (capital vs labor)
• States are agents of capitalist class, corporations as main actors
9. Comment
3 December 2020 at 13:08:53 • Capital tends to concentrate (competition → efficiency → small elite)
Economics ≠ politics • Focus on consequences of inequality
• Investment → productive capital growth → reduced rate of profit → wage reduction)
10. Comment • Ability to produce > ability to purchase
3 December 2020 at 13:07:23 12 • North exploits south
Individuals should be free to • Prescription: capitalism is bad
make decisions
11. Comment
3 December 2020 at 13:03:26
When exchanges fail to allocate
resources to social desirable
activities
12. Comment
3 December 2020 at 13:23:25
E.g. large corporations are based
in wealthy north but operate in
poor south
,13. Comment
3 December 2020 at 13:32:39
Land, capital, skilled labor,
unskilled labor
14. Comment
3 December 2020 at 13:32:58
Import-oriented, export-oriented,
unemployed
IPE course:
• Focus on interaction between:
• Societal interests:
• Material (what increases welfare)
13 14 • Shaped by endowments (skill-level, industry)
• Political interests:
• Politicians (what will keep me in office)
• Domestic institutions:
• Democratic (societal interests)
• Autocratic (elite interests)
• International institutions (enforce compliance with collective decisions)
• Politically constrained ef ciency: understand best policy given constraints
• Transatlantic divide:
• American: empiricist, group/individual (vs state) focused
• British: normative (e.g. ethical dilemmas), specific cases
Dark Leviathan analogy:
• Programmer creates unregulated marketplace on dark web → players start cheating system →
creator resorts to enforcement
• Message: marketplace requires (government) enforcement
• Realpolitik: order depends on threats of violence
Readings:
• International Political Economy (Oatley, 2019), chapter 1
• Farrel, "Dark Leviathan"
fi
, 15. Comment
3 December 2020 at 14:01:01
Benefits domestic producers over
foreign producers
16. Comment
3 December 2020 at 14:06:14
E.g. Us tariff on Canadian lumber
(under Trump)
- Ended up harming other US
industries that use lumber
- Canada retaliates with other
tariffs
17. Comment
3 December 2020 at 14:04:13
Part 2 - Trade
Impacts cost of goods
18. Comment Free trade is a net public good
3 December 2020 at 14:04:49 • Comparative advantage, eliminates waste
Protects regional products • Almost all economists agree
E.g. in EU, pork leg can only be 15 Types of trade protection:
labelled prosciutto if from Parma 16 • Tariff: tax on imported good
• Quota: limit on amount of good
19. Comment • Non-tariff barriers
3 December 2020 at 14:05:36 17 18 • E.g. domestic subsidies/insurance programs, protectionist laws
E.g. EU banned chlorinated 19 • Can be disguised as health/environmental concerns
chicken (virtually all US chicken)
Trade faces a collective action problem:
E.g. EU banned GMOs (little • Prisoner’s dilemma: protectionism as always dominant strategy
evidence of health risk) 20 • Hence states don’t liberalize unilaterally (except England)
• Barriers:
20. Comment • Information problems
3 December 2020 at 14:13:04
• Resolve of states
Since other state can exploit you
• Incentives to misrepresent position
• Commitment abilities
21. Comment
• Outside options
3 December 2020 at 14:24:15
- Can take years of negotiation
Factors that ease cooperation:
- Parties get better deals at
21 • Bargaining
expense of other side (limit on
• Suitable bargain exists
distribution of goods)
22 • Small # participants
23 • Linkage of policies
22. Comment
• International institutions (principle of reciprocity)
3 December 2020 at 15:07:06
Fewer interests to navigate • Set standards of behavior
24 • Monitor/enforce compliance
25 • Reduce transaction costs
23. Comment
3 December 2020 at 14:22:32
Reward/punishment in non-trade World Trade Organization:
area • Established 1994
26 • Predecessor: GATT (created after WWII)
24. Comment • Neither can agree on agricultural goods
3 December 2020 at 14:27:57 • Establishes common principles:
Solves information problem • Market liberalism
(makes defection visible) • Non-discrimination
• Ties state’s individual relations to overall trade network
25. Comment • Flexible (strength)
3 December 2020 at 14:27:17 • Features:
E.g. easier for states to join an • All members have equal vote (but dominated by US and EU interests)
existing agreement • Provide information/monitoring
• Most Favored Nation: best treatment is extended to all trade partners
26. Comment • Exceptions: free trade areas or customs unions
3 December 2020 at 14:29:11
General Agreement on Tariffs and
Trade
- Predecessor to WTO
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper bellakim. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.