100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Which of the following is the type of validity in quantitative research that evaluates how closely t €15,12   In winkelwagen

Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

Which of the following is the type of validity in quantitative research that evaluates how closely t

 1 keer bekeken  0 keer verkocht
  • Vak
  • Instelling

Which of the following is the type of validity in quantitative research that evaluates how closely t

Voorbeeld 1 van de 4  pagina's

  • 23 september 2022
  • 4
  • 2022/2023
  • Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
  • Vragen en antwoorden
avatar-seller
Which of the following is the type of validity in quantitative research that evaluates how closely
the results of your test correspond to the results of a different test?
Correct answer: Criterion validity
In quantitative research, you have to consider the reliability and validity of your methods
and measurements. Validity tells you how accurately a method measures something. If a
method measures what it claims to measure, and the results closely correspond to real-
world values, then it can be considered valid. There are four main types of validity:
Construct validity: Does the test measure the concept that it’s intended to measure?
Construct validity evaluates whether a measurement tool really represents the thing we are
interested in measuring. It’s central to establishing the overall validity of a method.
Content validity: Is the test fully representative of what it aims to measure? Content validity
assesses whether a test is representative of all aspects of the construct. To produce valid
results, the content of a test, survey or measurement method must cover all relevant parts of
the subject it aims to measure. If some aspects are missing from the measurement (or if
irrelevant aspects are included), the validity is threatened.
Face validity: Does the content of the test appear to be suitable to its aims? Face validity
considers how suitable the content of a test seems to be on the surface. It’s similar to content
validity, but face validity is a more informal and subjective assessment. As face validity is a
subjective measure, it’s often considered the weakest form of validity. However, it can be
useful in the initial stages of developing a method.
Criterion validity: Do the results correspond to a different test of the same thing? Criterion
validity evaluates how closely the results of your test correspond to the results of a different
test. To evaluate criterion validity, you calculate the correlation between the results of your
measurement and the results of the criterion measurement. If there is a high correlation, this
gives a good indication that your test is measuring what it intends to measure.
Which of the following assessment tools is used to measure the risk of a child running away?
orrect answer: Adolescent Concerns Evaluation
The Adolescent Concerns Evaluation (ACE) is a 40-item, multidimensional rapid-assessment
instrument used to measure the risk of a child running away.
Multi-Attitude Suicide Tendency Scale is used to measure the risk of childhood suicide. Child
and Parent Report of Posttraumatic Symptoms is used to measure post-traumatic symptoms.
Eyberg Child Behavior Checklist is used to measure children’s conduct-problem behaviors.
If a child’s behavior changed when he was removed from the environment that was causing the
behavior, what type of behavior modification is present?
Correct answer: Negative reinforcement
Negative reinforcement is the strengthening of a desired behavior through the use of
avoidance conditioning. Therefore, when a child's behavior changes when he or she is removed
from an environment, negative reinforcement is present.

Positive reinforcement is the strengthening of a desired behavior by adding a reward. Extinction
is the weakening of a conditioned response by discontinuing reinforcement after the response
occurs. Modeling is the behavior that is acquired from watching others.
A couple engaged in marital counseling is noted by their therapist to repeatedly avoid
discussing potentially conflicting topics by engaging in increasingly loud arguments with one
another about

This study source was downloaded by 100000852114193 from CourseHero.com on 09-23-2022 09:34:31 GMT -05:00


https://www.coursehero.com/file/157623289/Which-of-the-following-is-the-type-of-validity-in-quantitative-research-that-evaluates-how-closely-t/

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper zipporah01. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €15,12. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 79202 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€15,12
  • (0)
  Kopen