100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
summary chapter 2 the politics of the netherlands social studies bricks €6,49   In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

summary chapter 2 the politics of the netherlands social studies bricks

 6 keer bekeken  0 keer verkocht

samenvatting van hoofdstuk 2 the politics of the netherlands van social studies bricks. in het boek staan alle concepten erg moeilijk uitgelegd. in deze samenvatting heb ik alles uitgelegd op een veel makkelijkere manier om te begrijpen. met behulp van mijn samenvattingen heb ik het vak maatschappi...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 2 van de 12  pagina's

  • 28 september 2022
  • 12
  • 2021/2022
  • Samenvatting
Alle documenten voor dit vak (996)
avatar-seller
aloysevanwaesberghe
Maatschappijleer PTA samenvatting chapter 2

2.2) constitutional background and principles of democracy in NL
Road to NL democracy:
- between uprising Spanish occupation (-> 16th and 17th century) and French
occupation (1795)  Dutch Republic -> fledgling (pril) democracy -> small group of
privileged men governed together, who were elected by other groups of privileged
men
- 1814: introduction bicameral legislature under a constitutional monarchy (two
independent law making institutions(1st & 2nd chamber))  Second Chamber(House
of representatives): indirect suffrage (kiesrecht) by members of provincial councils
and other influential members of society. First Chamber (Senate) until 1848
appointed by the King.
- 1848: NL became a constitutionally (grondwet) governed democratic political system
with a figurehead monarch (king had lost many powers to parliament and
government)
1919: nation became a fully-fledged democracy with universal suffrage (men and women

2.3) representative democracy in NL
Separation of powers: Trias Politica (Montesquieu) 
- Executive (governmental (ministers, teachers etc) To help prevent corruption or
- Legislative (law making or parliamentary) abuse of power
- Judicial

Electing leaders in modern democracies:
USA: process indirect, but by Electoral College votes
EU: indirect voting: head government elected by being leader of the party

Two main forms of democratic election:
- Regional system (uk) ; parliament or President chosen by geographical constituencies
(each vote of each voter in country does not carry equal weight)
- proportional representation system (nl) ; one large electoral constituency -> all the
votes of a party in the country are counted up and divided by the amount of total
seats
comparison: proportional representation system: fairer (government less likely to be elected
by a minority of the electorate, but regional system closer to local interests of the people
(represent local or regional interests/areas).
Proportional representation system: also easier for a small party to enter parliament (easier
to get minimum of votes required for one seat)  lots of small parties: government made up
of coalitions of parties with conflicting interests. Not in USA (Republicans vs Democrats) or
UK (Labour - or Conservative Party)
combination two systems, concession (tegemoetkoming) NL: voters can not only vote for a
specific party, but also for a specific politician, other than the ‘list-puller’ representing that
party

, Dutch systems cons: country is officially divided into constituencies but do not count in
parliamentary representation. Also, compulsory voting abolished in 1970 (number of vote
cast proportional to votes cast, rather than proportional to number of eligible voters (in
aanmerking komende kiezers))
Beginning 20th century: increasingly weakened parliament, increasingly powerful
government
- Introduction universal suffrage (privileged men do not control parliament anymore)
- Increasing complexity of society requires increasingly decisive action from a
powerful, effective central government
- Rise of political parties because of universal suffrage end age of privileged
parliamentarians ruling alone
2nd half 20th century: powerful governments themselves begin to lose power to combination
of actors:
- Decentralisation: central government found itself too powerful, and work load was
too high: power, tasks and responsibilities were given to provincial councils, city and
town councils. Also: Dutch voters were losing interest in politics: by outsourcing:
closer to the people
Provincial level of decision-making in NL: all have their own legislative parliament
(election every 4 years) -> make decisions to do with infrastructure, zoning, planning
etc. Also: oversee policy and supervise implantation of those policies by
municipalities. Also elect members of the First Chamber / Senate. (have lost power,
while central government and municipal have gained)
Municipal level (city and town councils): beginning: lots of super small municipalities
-> size of local councils are increased (con: not so close to the people anymore, pro:
unburdens central government in The Hague). Election: elected every 4 years. The
council itself elects 2-9 Aldermen/ -women -> work together with Mayor to from the
municipality’s executive branch. Since 2002, Aldermen can’t be members of their
municipal councils (function more like central government and parliament) -> Mayor
and Aldermen propose municipal laws and carry those out (central government)
Municipal Council controls them (parliament).
Mayors are appointed by central government in The Hague, proportionally to the
representation of their parties in the national parliament (eg VVD 30% seats, 30%
VVD mayors in country). The task of a mayor is seen as a top-level position with
administrative and political responsibility, but close to the people and closely bound
up with their concerns

Problems with the unloading of power and authority to local government:
- Central government draws up unpopular policies, which need to be implemented by
local authorities, but don’t provide enough money or personnel -> tension between
local and central government, and unpopularity of municipal authorities, and some
local authorities refuse

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper aloysevanwaesberghe. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 67096 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€6,49
  • (0)
  Kopen