100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
2022 OCTOBER EXAM - LAW OF EVIDENCE (LEV3701) €5,35   In winkelwagen

Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

2022 OCTOBER EXAM - LAW OF EVIDENCE (LEV3701)

5 beoordelingen
 54 keer bekeken  3 keer verkocht
  • Vak
  • Instelling

Question 1 What must the court in a civil case do if a legal question about the cross-examination of a witness arises and there is no express provision in any South African legislation on the specific issue? Fully explain with reference to a definition. [5] Question 2 Lucky is on trial for the m...

[Meer zien]
Laatste update van het document: 2 jaar geleden

Voorbeeld 3 van de 13  pagina's

  • 13 oktober 2022
  • 13 oktober 2022
  • 13
  • 2022/2023
  • Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
  • Onbekend

5  beoordelingen

review-writer-avatar

Door: Sinthle6 • 2 jaar geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: mangenarenice • 2 jaar geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: noxville • 1 jaar geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: Lelana32 • 2 jaar geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: Thandiswe63 • 2 jaar geleden

avatar-seller
LAW OF
EVIDENCE
LEV3701




UNISA

EXAM SOLUTIONS

13 October 2022

, ACADEMIC HONESTY DECLARATION

1. I understand what academic dishonesty entails and am aware of Unisa’s
policies in this regard.

2. I declare that this assignment is my own, original work. Where I have used
someone else’s work, I have indicated this by using the prescribed style of
referencing. Every contribution to, and quotation in, this assignment from the
work or works of other people has been referenced according to the
prescribed style.

3. I have not allowed, and will not allow anyone to copy my work with the
intention of passing it off as his or her own work.

4. I did not make use of another student’s work and submit it as my own.

NAME: ……………………………………………………………………………………...

SIGNATURE: ……………………………………………………………………………...

STUDENT NUMBER: ……………………………………………………………………..

MODULE CODE: ...............................................................................................

DATE: ……………………………………………………………………………………....

MARK RECEIVED FOR ASSIGNMENT 01: …………………………………………..

MARK RECEIVED FOR ASSIGNMENT 02: …………………………………………..

, Question 1


What must the court in a civil case do if a legal question about the cross-
examination of a witness arises and there is no express provision in any South
African legislation on the specific issue? Fully explain with reference to a
definition. [5]


A residuary clause determines that foreign law has to be followed on topics for which no
express local statutory provision had been made (Indirect incorporation). These are those
sections in South African statutes which incorporate foreign law into South African law and
thereby preserve that part of foreign law. The general rule in a Civil Matter is that the
evidence is usually inadmissible – this rule is based on the relevancy principle. Generally:
only evidence of general reputation is relevant for the purposes of the law of evidence.


Question 2
Lucky is on trial for the murder of his wife. The prosecution claims that Lucky
committed the murder by poisoning his wife with arsenic. Lucky’s defence is that
his wife committed suicide. Innocent, an attorney, is called by the prosecution to
testify that the accused approached him in his professional capacity for legal
advice and, during their discussions, admitted to having killed his wife. Innocent
subsequently declined to represent Lucky. The prosecution states that this
evidence will be admissible because Lucky had told Innocent of a crime that had
already been completed. Do you agree? Fully discuss with reference to the
requirements for the admissibility of this type of evidence. [10]


I do not agree as the evidence will be inadmissible because the communication was
privileged.


Before legal professional privilege will apply, the following requirements must be met:


1. The legal adviser must act in a professional capacity


This is a question of fact and a strong indication would be the payment of a fee, although the
absence of such would not necessarily be conclusive evidence of the opposite. The grounds
for following the approach of the English courts were set out in Mohamed v President of the
Republic of South Africa 2001 2 SA 1145 (C) in that salaried legal advisers (e.g. those

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper StudyAssistant036. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €5,35. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 75323 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€5,35  3x  verkocht
  • (5)
  Kopen