100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten
logo-home
Summary, article by Mommaas (2008) The ‘leisure industries’ and the re-composition of the public sphere €2,99
In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Summary, article by Mommaas (2008) The ‘leisure industries’ and the re-composition of the public sphere

1 beoordeling
 2 keer verkocht

Summary of the article by Mommaas (2008): The ‘leisure industries’ and the re-composition of the public sphere.

Voorbeeld 1 van de 6  pagina's

  • 8 februari 2016
  • 6
  • 2015/2016
  • Samenvatting
Alle documenten voor dit vak (15)

1  beoordeling

review-writer-avatar

Door: chaz12 • 6 jaar geleden

avatar-seller
jannahollema
Summary: The ‘leisure industries’ and the re-composition of the public
sphere – H. Mommas (2008)

From the end of the 19th century all over Europe leisure became organized as a
public good. However the current globalization, commercialisation and
integration of the world of leisure is primarily regarded as a threat; it lowers both
the social and cultural quality of public life. This stimulated a defensive attitude
towards the popular, commercial, technological culture. However in context of
the current ‘informational’ or ‘creative’ turn in western economies, this defensive
attitude is becoming problematic.

Themes on the move
The historical context of leisure is changing: the theme leisure in on the move.
‘Leisure’ and the ‘leisure industries’ are both rapidly becoming a part of policy
and management ‘faddism’ in major parts of Europe. From the late 1980’s
onwards both concepts reflect the rapid expansion of a new, more commercially
operating, leisure economy. From the perspective of ‘continental Europe’ notions
of ‘leisure’ are problematic.

First of all: the concept of leisure as such. The current universalisation of more
commercial notions of leisure ignores the wider philosophical, social and political
diversity of concepts of leisure, as well it ignores the commercial elements in the
history of the continental field of ‘free time’. From time onwards, free time was
spent at privately financed fairs, festivals, cafes etc.
Secondly, there is the addition of ‘industries’. In most European languages
‘industry’ evokes connotations of industrial plants and labour, related to coal and
steal. Therefore some introduce concepts as ‘leisure economy’, but this
neutralisation of ‘industry’ actually denies a more critical perspective. For them,
‘leisure industries’ should actually be ‘cultural industries’, which indicates the
manner in which the 20th century art was being reduced to an object of economic
rationality and mass industries. To conclude: the meaning of ‘leisure industries’
has become more ambiguous.

Nowadays there is a movement away from welfare and public service oriented
notions of leisure, towards more commercial, entertainment-oriented concepts of
leisure. This includes three, partly overlapping, transformations, which lead to a
further de-traditionalisation of existing forms of culture and free time.
1. A change in the status of leisure: from a public good, organized for the
civilising benefits of citizens, to a private commodity, to be exchanged on a
market for presumed sovereign consumers.
2. Market- and technology driven forms of de- and re-classification within the
leisure field itself, towards a more ‘horizontal’, integrative and ‘demand’
oriented approach.
3. An opening up of the national leisure field through the liberalisation and
expansion of media, tourism and leisure markets.
 Together these developments are changing the state of the art of public leisure
provision, and the subsequent role for public intervention.

Leisure and the public sphere
To have a good perspective, it is necessary to take a look at the historical role
ascribed to leisure. Roughly abstracting from regional differences, one can depict
a history in which the developing nation states became increasingly involved in
the support and organisation of leisure facilities. Notion of leisure (free time)
became almost synonymous with public leisure. The involvement of the state was

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Direct to-the-point

Direct to-the-point

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper jannahollema. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €2,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 66184 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Begin nu gratis
€2,99  2x  verkocht
  • (1)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd