All lectures and compulsory articles of Consumer behavior and Sustainability
Lecture 1
Normative Decision Theory
Normative theories
→ “concerned with the nature of rationality and the logic of decision-making”
Descriptive theories:
→ “concerned with people’s beliefs and preferences as they are, not as they should mbe”
Rational choice theory: basic axioms
Expected value theory: decision-making under risk
Rational choice theory
➔ People have stable preferences
➔ People consider costs and benefits of all option when making a decision
➔ People choose the option that maximized their benefits
Transitivity
- If A > B and B > C then A > C
Dominance
- If A and B are equally good on all dimensions
- Except one where A is better
- Then A should always be preferred
Invariance
- preferences should not depend on the way they are described
Perfect information processing
Selfishness
People often deviate from the principles of rational choice theory
(e.g. starbucks koffie: klein 2,50 medium 3,50 → kiezen voor medium. Klein 2,50, medium 3,50 en
large 5,00 → ook medium kiezen)
Preferences are influenced by context
Compromise effect: an option is chosen more often when its attributes are not at the extremes
Attraction effect: option a is more strongly preferred over option B if A obviously dominates another
option ( popcorn small 3,50, medium 6 en large 6,50)
People sometimes:
- avoid information
, - rely on “bad” information
- ignore “good” information
People are not always selfish
Expected value theory
Used to describe the expected outcome of risky choice
- multiple possible outcomes
- each outcome has a probability of happening
Examples: gambling
- investing money
- buying a product / service
- asking someone out on a date
- moving to a different city
- choosing a job
How to calculate expected value?
- value of each outcome
- probability of each outcome
- multiply value by probability
- add it all up to get EV
A proposed gamble
- heads: you pay me 10 euros
- tails: I pay you 1 euro
What is the expected value?
- outcome 1: heads = (0,5 x -10) = -5
- outcome 2: tails = (0,5 x+1) = +0.5
- -5 + 0.5 = - 4.5 euros
Should you take the gamble? Weigh option
Expected value theory:
, - people calculate expected value
- then choose the option with the highest EV
People deviate from EV
- St. Petersburg paradox (1713)
Expected utility theory
- value = / (niet gelijk aan) value ; personal preference matter
- people maximize expected utility
Summary
Normative theories describe how decisions should be made
RCT:
- people are selfish
- people are rational
- = people will maximize their personal benefits
EVT/EUT
- people assign utility + probability to each outcome
- … and pursue the outcome with the highest expected utility
These theories are useful but often fail at description
Lecture 2
Descriptive decision theory
Recap:
Normative vs descriptive theories
Normative theories (Rational Choice Theorie, Expected Utility Theory)
→ people maximize expected utility (=selfish)
→ utility & probability (=EU) is all that matters
→ people often violate these assumptions
Agenda for today:
- Defenses of normative theories
- Descriptive decision theory
- prospect theory
In defense of normative theories:
● “As if”
○ people may not go through the mental steps
○ but they still chose in line with theoretical predictions
○ people behave as if they are maximizing utility
, But: choices don’t conform to theoretical predictions
● Random errors
○ small deviations from rationality
○ deviations are random
○ they average out on the aggregate
But: deviations are systematic
● Incentives & learning
○ critique of experimental methods
○ people need proper incentives
○ people need a chance to learn
But: “Irrational” behavior even with proper incentives with learning, and among experts
Behavioral economics
Behavioral economics:
- attempt to build descriptive theories of economic decision-making
- observe how people actually make decisions
- lab experiments
● Heuristics & biases program
○ Kahneman & Tversky
○ They actually looked at what do we know about humans psychology, how the mind
works → in decision making
○ Psychological principles
○ Biases: systematic deviations from rationality
○ Heuristics: mental short-cuts
● Prospect theory
○ how people make risky choices
○ alternative to expected utility theory
○ value function
■ how people value gains and losses
1. reference point
2. diminishing sensitivity
3. steeper loss function
Reference point:
- there’s no absolute value
- everything is valued in comparison to some reference point
E.g. You spend a day at the casino and win 5 euros
How happy are you?
You spend a day at the casino and win 1 million euros. The, at the last minute, you 999,995
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper emmavermaas. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €7,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.