Samenvatting
Full summary- Behavioural decision making theory in health
Great summary on BDTH. Very extensive and complete. Enough to score a good grade probably
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 4 van de 62 pagina's
Voorbeeld 4 van de 62 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Behavioral Decision Making in HealthIntroduction- March 29
HEPL/ HE: improving healthcare and health policy
- What challenges doe health policy makers face?
o How to measure people’s preferences for health?
o How to spend the money the most efficiently?
- How can economic thinking help understand the behavior of patients, providers, payers and
policy makers?
o We use (behavioral) economic models to describe individuals’ behavior
- How should empirical research in healthcare be conducted and interpreted?
o How can we incorporate empirical evidence of behavioral biases into policy making?
Aims of this course
- To help you get a sound understanding of the methodological difficulties surrounding
economic evaluation of healthcare and their possible solutions
- To encourage you to critically reflect on the tools used in economic evaluations of healthcare
- Introduction into the most recent evidence obtained in the study of decision theory in
health, using a behavioral economic approach
- Inform you of key insights derived from such experiments and discuss their implications for
health economic evaluations
Week 1
- Introduction
- Theoretical properties of the QALY model
- Empirical evidence on the underlying assumptions
Week 2
- Biases in health utility measurement
o In what way do people violate rationality axioms when measuring health
preferences?
o How does this affect economic evaluations
- Workgroup to practice with the material
Week 3
- Discounting
o How do we deal with delays in costs and effects
- Which method to use?
o What works best?
Week 4
- Workgroup on child health valuation
- Which method to use? Part 2
- From theory to practice: correcting methods for health state valuation
Week 5
- Equity weighing (part 1 and 2)
o How should we aggregate individual preferences
o Should we all get the same weight or not?
o What is we have both risk and inequality
Week 6
- Workgroups
o Child health valuation, part 2
o Exercises
1
, - Q&A sessions
Lecture 2- Theoretical properties of QALYs- March 29
Position in this course
- Topics Behavioural Decision Theory in Health:
o Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)
o Monetary valuation of health
o Time preference (discounting)
o Utility measurement (mainly in situations of risk)
o Equity
- In effect, we study QALYs in three dimensions:
o Under risk
o Over time (discounting)
o At the societal level (equity)
Total Healthcare expenditures per head in 2010
- A lot higher in the US than in the Netherlands
Criticism on putting a value on human life
- Cost-cutting device
- Human life is priceless
- Leave it to the politicians
Economic evaluation
- Comparison of costs and benefits
- Central question: how can we express the benefits of healthcare numerically?
Approaches to economic evaluations
- Ignore health benefits- costs minimizations: CMA
- Express benefits as life-years gained: CEA
- Express benefits as life-years gained and adjust for quality of life: CUA
How to express this numerically
1. Deriving a monetary value of a QALY
Example: road inuries
- U: unconscious followed by death
- You face an annual risk of 6 in 100,000 to end up in state U due to a road accident. How
much are you willing to pay for a safety device that reduces this risk with 1 in 100,000?
- The value of life
o 12 Dollars WTP
o Value of life: 12/0.00001= 1.2 M
Problem 1: sensitivity to irrelevant information
- Starting point bias
- Range effect
o The elicited WTP depends on if and, if so, which comparators are used in the
question. A separate evaluation may for instance laed to a higher value than when
the valuated item is compared to a better item
- WTP/ WTA disparity
2
,Problem 2: insensitivity to relevant information
- Scope effects
o WTP values are not sensitive to the amount of the good that is being valued
o Reduction of 3 in 100,000
o WTP= 18 dollar
o VoL= 18/0.00003= 0.6 million
Meta- analysis by Ryen and Svensson
- Overall mean WTP-Q of 118,839, median of 24,226
o Skewed: median lower than the mean
- Stated preference studies give lower estimates than VSL studies
- Higher values when risk of death is included than when pure quality of life changes are being
valued
- WTP-Q not constant across QALY changes: larger QALY changes give lower WTP-Q estimates
(insensitivity to scope)
2. Introduction to the QALY model
Most common model: Quality-Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs)
- Additive model
- Let (q1,…,q2) be a health profile
- QALY model: U(q1,..,qt)= SUM H(qt)
- Chronic health: U(Q,T)= H(Q)* T
- Advantages
o Intuitively appealing
o Easy to use in practice
- Disadvantages
o May be too simple
Questions related to QALY model
- How restrictive is the QALY model?
- How can we determine the utilities H(Q)?
Purpose QALY model
- Represent preferences
- If X > Y then V(X) < V(Y)
- If V(X)> V(Y) then X< Y
Assumptions for the next slides
- Health states are chronic
- Health states are preferred to death
- Expected utility holds
Expected utility
- EU ((Q1,T1),p,(Q2,T2))= pU(Q1,T1) + (1-p) U(Q2,T2)
o P is probability
o U is utility
o Q1 is what you get: full health for example
o T, between brackets is life years
- Two points of U can be chosen freely
3
, Standard gamble
- ( Back pain , 30 y . ) ( ( Full health ,30 y . ) , p , Death )
- Apply Expected Utility:
o U ( Back pain , 30 y . ) =p∗U ( Full health ,30 y . ) + ( 1− p )∗U ( Death)
- Apply scaling:
o U ( Full health, 30 y . )=1
o U ( Death)=0
o U ( Back pain , 30 y . ) =p
- What about the 30 years?
3. Original derivation of the QALY model
First characterization linear QALY model
- Pliskin, Shepard & Weinstein (1980)
- 3 conditions
o (mutual) utility independence
o constant proportional trade-off
o risk neutrality wrt life duration
Mutual utility independence
Quality of life utility independent of life duration
- (Back Pain, rest of life) ((FH, rest of life), 2/3, (Death, rest of life))
- Then also
- (Back Pain, 10y.) ((FH, 10y.), 2/3, (Death, 10y.))
Here life durations changed from rest of life to 10 years
Life duration UI of Quality of life
- (Back pain, 20y.) ((Back pain, 40y.), 2/3, (Back pain, 10y.))
- Then also
- (Full health, 20y.) ((Full health, 40y.), 2/3, (Full health, 10y.))
Here back pain changed to full health
Intermediate result
- The following statements are equivalent
o Utility independence holds
o U is either additive, U(Q,T)= H(Q)+ L(T), or multiplicative U(Q,T)= H(Q) * L(T)
Hence
- To arrive at the QALY model must
o 1) exclude the additive model and
o 2) ensure linearity of L(T)
Standard gamble, part 2
- ( Back pain , 30 y . ) ( ( Full health ,30 y . ) , p , Death )
- Apply Expected Utility:
o U ( Back pain , 30 y . ) =p∗U ( Full health ,30 y . ) + ( 1− p )∗U ( Death , 30 y .)
- Apply utility independence:
o Additive: H ¿
o Multiplicative: H ¿)¿ L(30 y .)¿
- Apply scaling:
4
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper puckdewaal. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €8,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 78252 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen