LPL4804 OCTOBER NOVEMBER
EXAM PACK 2022/2023
)
LPL – 4804 – SUMMARIES
S/U 1 – P 1 –OVERVIEW OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN LAND REGISTRATION SYSTEM
1. Differentiate between the positive and negative deeds registration systems.
A. A positive system implies the following:
a. The State guarantees...
Thank you for the Purchase and the rating, and all the best in your academics. Feel free to consult, and message me for more Study Materials via email; studyking254@gmail.com
Door: mphoportia • 2 maanden geleden
Verkoper
Volgen
Tutor23
Ontvangen beoordelingen
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
LPL4804 OCTOBER NOVEMBER
EXAM PACK 2022/2023
)
, LPL – 4804 – SUMMARIES
S/U 1 – P 1 –OVERVIEW OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN LAND REGISTRATION SYSTEM
1. Differentiate between the positive and negative deeds registration systems.
A. A positive system implies the following:
a. The State guarantees to bona fidethird parties that the state register in the designated deeds
registry is an authoritative record of the rights to clearly defined units of land.
b. The State examines/investigates documentation and transactions for legality.
c. The State completes and maintains a register of title.
d. Register of title is linked to a cadastral system of maps and diagrams.
e. Transfer takes place when the register of title is annotated and any deeds are merely endorsed.
f. From this it follows that new deeds are not necessary for each transaction
as the main source of information is the deeds register which is merely
annotated/updated.
g. Linking of different transactions occurs
h. The State guarantees the accuracy of the deed register and is liable for shortcomings.
i. Such a deeds register is characterized by a high degree of state interference
(as for instance in the Torrens system, created by Sir Robert Torrens and which is
still being used in New Zealand and in New South Wales, Australia)
B. A negative system implies the following:
a. The State gives no guarantees to bona fidethird parties regarding the accuracy of the
state deeds register.
b. The State simply records deed submitted at face value.
c. There is no examination of the deeds or investigation by the State prior to recording
d. Transfer is effected in the new deed, not when the state deeds register is
annotated/updated so a new deed must be executed for each transaction.
e. There is usually no link to a cadastral system of maps and diagrams
, f. Third parties cannot rely on the accuracy of the State records, which might give an
inaccurate or incomplete picture
g. The State incurs no liability for inaccurate or incomplete records
h. There is minimal state interference (as for instance in the land registration system in the
Netherlands)
2. Discuss which system applies in South Africa, substantiate your choice with references to cases
a. In SA land registration is based on statute (Alienation of Land Act and Deeds Registries Act)
and is unique because it is nominally negative, but has some characteristics of a positive
system as well.
b. While the State does not guarantee the correctness of the data contained in the SA deeds
registries, it does not simply record deeds at face value either.
It provides owners/real right holders with security of title.
Both titleholders and bona fidethird parties do rely on the correctness of the
information contained in the title and deeds registry records.
It is also unnecessary for SA titleholders to insure their rights in case a third party
should subsequently prove to have a better title to the property, as is the case with
other negative registration systems.
c. Barclays Nasionale Bank v Registrateur van Aktes – land which was subject to a mortgage
bond was transferred to a bona fidepurchaser without the bond first being cancelled.
The court held that the mortgagee’s secured real right was not terminated by the
transfer, and that the transferee therefore acquired the land subject to the bond.
Until the mistake is discovered and rectified, the same principle will apply to all
subsequent transfers.
This means that the mortgagee’s rights remain intact to the detriment of subsequent
transferees although a number of subsequent transfers may have been registered.
d. Standard Bank v Breitenbach
– relates to the reliability and completeness of deeds office
information.
There the court held that a mortgage bond that had erroneously not been endorsed on
the title deed of the land was in fact duly registered once the registrar had signed the
mortgage bond, and that a bona fidepurchaser of the land therefore acquired the land
subject to the bond.
, e. – following a motor vehicle accident in which Ms Shea
Legato McKenna Inc v Shea (SCA)
suffered severe brain injuries making it impossible for her to manage her own legal and
financial affairs, attorney McKenna of Legator McKenna Inc was appointed by the court as
curator in March 2002.
Then before receiving a letter of appointment from the Master, in April 2002,
McKenna sold Ms Shea’s immovable property to Mr and Mrs Erskine, in order to
pay Ms Shea’s pressing debts.
With his signature McKenna inserted the words “curator” and “Subject to the
approval of the Master”.
The Master’s appointment in favour of McKenna was issued in June 2002 and the
Master’s consent to the sale followed on 17 July 2002.
The transfer in favour of the Erskine’s was registered on 27 July 2002 and in March
2003.
Ms Shea recovered to such an extent that the court declared her once more capable of
managing her own affairs.
Approximately a year later Shea applied to court for, among others, an order for the
return of the immovable property against repayment of the purchase price.
The Erskines in turn instituted a conditional damage claim against McKenna for
R1.7m should the immovable property be returned to Shea, based on McKenna’s
breach of his implied warranty that he was authorized to sell the property.
In the court a quo Shea succeeded.
The sale was declared void, so was the subsequent registration of transfer in the
deeds office.
On appeal this decision was reversed and the abstract theory of the passing of
ownership applied.
It has thus now been definitively decided that the abstract theory of passing of
ownership applies in SA.
This means that even though the original causaof a transaction registered in the
deeds office may be defective, if there is a real agreement to transfer ownership and
both parties have performed under that real agreement, then the subsequent transfer is
valid.
NB** In terms of the abstract theory, there are 2 requirements for passing ownership:
1) Delivery: In the case of immovable property, this is effected by registration of
transfer in the Deeds office.
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper Tutor23. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €2,86. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
