100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Seminar Assigments International Human Rights Law €15,49   In winkelwagen

Overig

Seminar Assigments International Human Rights Law

 18 keer bekeken  0 keer verkocht

Seminar Assigments International Human Rights Law University of Groningen Master International Human Rights Law Individual assigments 1 + 2 Teacher: Tsampi Referencing: OSCOLA

Voorbeeld 3 van de 25  pagina's

  • 1 november 2022
  • 25
  • 2021/2022
  • Overig
  • Onbekend
Alle documenten voor dit vak (1)
avatar-seller
studentrechten1200
Seminar International Human Rights Law

2021/2022: University of Groningen



Master programme: International human rights law - seminar


If you want the feedback of the teacher, you can also get that, if you send me a direct
message

Teacher: Tsampi

Including footnotes + Bibliography (OSCOLA)


Individual assignment 1 + 2

,First individual assignment




‘CESCR and its influence on the scope of the ICESCR’


Topic: 2
Lecturer: Dr. Katerina Tsampi
Wordcount: 1757 excluding



Table of Contents
1. Introduction............................................................................................................................................... 3

2. Establishment of the CESCR........................................................................................................................ 3
2.1 Role of the CESCR...........................................................................................................................................4

3. General Comments.................................................................................................................................... 4
3.1 Extraterritoriality; General Comment 3.........................................................................................................5
3.2 The right to an adequate standard of living..................................................................................................6
3.2.1 The right to water; General Comment 15..............................................................................................6
3.3 Influence.........................................................................................................................................................7

4. Concluding observations............................................................................................................................ 7
4.1 Follow-Up.......................................................................................................................................................8
4. 2 Legal issues....................................................................................................................................................9

5. Conclusion................................................................................................................................................. 9

Bibliography................................................................................................................................................ 10

1. Introduction............................................................................................................................................. 15

2. Special procedures: the SRT...................................................................................................................... 16
2.1 Mandate.......................................................................................................................................................16
2.2 Setting the scene..........................................................................................................................................17
2.2.1 Spain 2003............................................................................................................................................18
2.2.2 Some controversy.................................................................................................................................18

2.3 Picking and choosing; the difficulties faced............................................................................................. 19

2.4 Conclusion............................................................................................................................................. 20

Bibliography................................................................................................................................................ 22

, The CESCR; a last resort for a meaningful implementation system for the
ICESCR?



1. Introduction


The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) is the only treaty body, out
of the existing 10 United Nations (UN) treaty bodies, that is not established on the basis of
specific provisions of an existing international treaty. 1 However, the CESCR plays a major role
in the development of the content and norms found in the International Convention on
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR).


The research question which forms the central point in this paper is as follows; in what way
does the CESCR influence the development and content of the norms laid down in the
ICESCR? This paper will analyze the role of the CESCR, by specifically looking at the General
Comments and concluding observations. Furthermore, this paper will touch upon the follow-
up procedure and some legal issues. This paper provides an empirical basis to understand
the influence of the CESCR monitoring process and its importance for the development of
the content of the ICESCR.



2. Establishment of the CESCR

To understand the role and uniqueness of the CESCR, it is important to know some
background information on the establishment of this UN treaty body. This paragraph will
briefly discuss this.

The CESCR is a body of independent experts that monitors the implementation of the
ICESCR by its States parties.2 The CESCR was established under the UN Economic and
Social Council (ECOSOC) Resolution 1985/173 to carry out the monitoring functions

1
A.Kh. Abashide, ‘Role of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Implementation and
Development of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedom’ [2012], 1 RUDN Journal of Law, 185, 185.
2
Manisuli Ssnyonjo, ‘Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in International Law, (Hart Publishing 2009), 5.
3
UN ECOSOC Res 1985/17 (28 May 1985) UN Doc E/RES/1985/17.

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper studentrechten1200. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €15,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 83662 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€15,49
  • (0)
  Kopen