100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten
logo-home
Summary KRM 320 Section B semester test 2 everything you need to know €5,34
In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Summary KRM 320 Section B semester test 2 everything you need to know

 1 keer verkocht
  • Vak
  • Instelling

KRM 320 Section B semester test 2 everything you need to know

Voorbeeld 3 van de 24  pagina's

  • 2 november 2022
  • 24
  • 2022/2023
  • Samenvatting
avatar-seller
KRM SEMESTER TEST 2
SECTION B (CONTEMPORARY CRIME)
RISK SOCIETY
RISK SOCIETY
 A developmental phase of modern society in which social, political, economic, and
individual risks increasingly tend to escape institutions for monitoring and protection in
society (Ulrich Beck).


RISK
 Recognition and judgement we experience when faced with uncertainty.
 Risk is not new phenomena (it has just moved from natural to man-made risk).
 Recognition and judgement relationship = we reflect iot judge iot make decisions
about what to do next.
 2 levels of reflects and judge:
– (1) society (uncertainty/anxiety affects structure of events).
– (2) individual (faced with choices and courses of action which lack
support/rules + deviance: going against societies norms and values).


RISK AND REFLEXIVITY
 Anxiety about new risk failure of institutions critical questioning of current
policies and practices.
 Reflection:
– Is risk concrete or perception? – crisis in another part of world IS
concrete but if not directly affecting us then it is perception.
 People perceive risk differently (some people more scared of crime than others).


MAIN ARGUMENTS OF ULRICH BECK
 Increased wealth production need for money certain risks (reciprocal
relationship).
 Creation of new risks is unintended by-product of modernization.
 New problems require new solutions (use reflexive modernization).
 Industrial solutions (increased production, redistribution and increased social
protection) IS NOT sufficient to fix global crisis.

,  Addressing paradigm of modernization = rethinking, reprogramming and policy
change:
– Paradigm because – we modernize to address problems but modernization
creates new risks (solutions to risks create new risks).


REFLEXIVE MODERNITY
 Reflecting & making judgement calls where reflection not previously necessary.
 Reduces modern structures to create new modernity.
 Modernization radicalizes itself.
 Classic v reflexive modernity:
– Classic (used to have)
> skepticism about religion, world demystified through science.
– Reflexive (currently have)
> Skepticism about science as it causes hazards.
> Demystification of science and modernity (they caused disasters).
> Restructuring and re-conceptualizing what we know leads to space
of radicalization.


AXES OF CONFLICT
These are all intertwined:
 Ecological conflicts.  Global warming + pollution (ecological)
conflicts with financial crises as more money
EFT  Global financial crises. needed will increase pollution
 Terrorism crisis needs money to combat but
 Global terrorist networks. we have a financial crisis


COMPARISON OF INDUSTRIAL V RISK SOCIETY
INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY RISK SOCIETY
(Marx, Weber, Durkheim) (Beck)
Central How do we create and distribute How do we prevent and minimize risk
question wealth? resulting from modernization?
Subjects are… Impoverished. Prosperous but frightened.

Ideal Equality. Safety.

Being and Being determines consciousness – Consciousness determines being –
consciousness what you do determined what you what you know determines what you
know. do (knowledge necessary for
recognition of risks).
Consequences Simple and visible. Complex and sometimes invisible.
CONSEQUENCES OF RISK SOCIETY

,  Old values and traditional support networks disappearing (look after ourselves
rather than community, family life and traditional belief system under threat, lack
of dominant ideology).
 International inequality (poor countries at greater risks due to extreme poverty).
 Social and technological risks interconnected.


HASSAN ARTICLE (techno-environmental risks and ecological modernization in double risk societies)
 Conflicting perspectives: environmental economics vs ecological
modernization vs risk society thesis:
– Exist on spectrum: limits to grow growth unlimited.
Apocalyptic future and we need urgent World is facing fewer ecological problems than ever before and
 2 sociological theories: ecological restructuring of capitalism only way to deal with these problems is to encourage more growth

– (1) Risk society thesis (opposes institutions and policymakers
dependance on scientists in determining environmental risk).
– (2) ecological modernization (science, technology and mainstream
political actors are important in solving environmental problems) –
ecological growth can continue whilst ensuring environmental protection.
 ‘double risk’ societies = traditional, southern, poor countries faced with danger of
risk society before achieving post-industrial status (not ALL 3 rd world countries).
– (1) continuous struggle for fulfilling material needs (traditional risks).
– (2) increasing social anxiety about high consequence
techno-environmental risks (modern risks).
Harm to human health and natural environment presented by technological and industrial products

Western risk societies are becoming self-correcting which exposes double risk societies to more problems bcs of globalization (global
capitalism exploits poor countries by relocating rich countries pollution and resource depleting industries to poor countries).


 Ecological modernization theory:
– Need for society, market actors and state to manage environment.
– Economic growth can be separated from raw material, energy use and
waste generation through application of environmentally friendly
technology and redesign of institutions.
– Key stages of development and maturation:
> 1st phase – emphasizes role of science and technology in
environmental reform (no social transformation).

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Direct to-the-point

Direct to-the-point

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper kiaradavey. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €5,34. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 69052 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Begin nu gratis
€5,34  1x  verkocht
  • (0)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd