100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Summary Teamwork - Theories, Design and Dynamics €5,48   In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Summary Teamwork - Theories, Design and Dynamics

 26 keer bekeken  1 keer verkocht

Summary of the four lectures of Teamwork - Theories, Design and Dynamics. Lecture 1: Team Theories Lecture 2: Team Membership Lecture 3: Team Composition Lecture 4: Team Dynamics

Voorbeeld 3 van de 21  pagina's

  • 3 november 2022
  • 21
  • 2022/2023
  • Samenvatting
Alle documenten voor dit vak (3)
avatar-seller
sarakruiter
Lecture 1 Team Theories
Work teams = interdependent collection of individuals who share responsibility for specific outcomes
for their organization

Why are teams popular? (Hackman) Benefits of teams:
“teams offer the potential for synergy, that wonderful state when a group “clicks” and members
achieve something together that no one of them could possibly have accomplished alone”

- Teams bring more resources
- Diversity in background and expertise
- Flexibility, keep the work going

Interdependence = “The dependence of two or more people or things on each other.”
Example: If I grow apples for a living, I am depended on people buying apples.

Interdependence in work teams: Determined by features of the team (i.e., the task and required
output) that define interconnectedness of team members.




Pooled interdependence: The team technically is a team but members don’t really depend on each
other. (Low interdependence)

- Individual tasks are pooled at the end as group output.
- Individual contributions are valued (rewarded) more than collective contributions.
- Redundant individual resources / expertise etc.

Sequential interdependence: First person works on the assignment first, second person improves
the assignment and hands it in.

Reciprocal interdependence: Team works on a complex project/product. Constantly working
together to create output.

- Individuals work simultaneously on all aspects of the task.
- Rewards are based on the collective output/end product.
- Members differ in their type and quantity of resources.

,Task interdependence = The degree to which members (a) depend on another for access to critical
resources and (b) create workflows that require coordinated action.

Example: Medical team:
Corona IC → Low task interdependence
Complex treatment → high task interdependence

Outcome interdependence = The degree to which goals are formulated and outcomes are rewarded
in terms of collective rather than individual contributions.

Example:
Red bull racing team is a team, however both drivers are competing with each other. And when one
of them wins, he gets the trophy as an individual, not as a team.
When a soccer team wins they get one trophy as a team.

What do work teams need to be effective?

➢ Task
- Do not use a team for work that is better done by individuals.
- Some projects turn out better when performed by one talented individual on behalf of a
group than by the group as a whole working in lockstep.

Example: Writing a book (is better done alone). An orchestra requires a lot of coordination and is
very complex, but as a team it can achieve perfect synergy.

➢ Structure
- To reap the benefits of teamwork, one must actually build the team.
- Set boundaries, define relationships, divide tasks, form relationships with stakeholders, etc.

Example: An orchestra is very structured, all the instruments are positioned at a specific place.

➢ Leadership and support
- Leaders need to give direction to avoid ambiguity.
- The organizational context needs to provides support that is specifically tuned to the needs
of work teams.
- It is important to reward collective outcomes.

Example: the conductor in an orchestra is very important, it makes sure the orchestra sounds good.

IMOI model (Ilgen et al., 2005) Allows for feedback loops!




Input:

➢ Team design
- Composition (e.g., KSAs; size, stability; week 3)
- Interdependence (task, outcome; Courtright et al., 2015)
- Leadership and authority (see Hackman, 2002)
➢ Task factors (e.g., complexity; requirements; task type)
➢ Context (e.g., organizational culture, resources; also Hackman, 2002)

, Potential performance (Steiner, 1972): performance that a team could achieve

▪ Is high when teams have the resources (composition, context) that are required by
the task.

Task types and potential performance (Steiner, 1972)



Pooled interdependence




Actual performance (Steiner, 1972)
Actual performance = potential performance – process loss (mediator)

Process loss = Coordination loss & Motivation loss

Mediator: (Marks et al., 2001)

➢ Team processes: “members' interdependent acts that convert inputs to outcomes through
cognitive, verbal, and behavioral activities directed toward organizing taskwork to achieve
collective goals”
- Example: Information sharing and elaboration, conflict management, decision making and
problem solving, physical activities, relational activities, ….
➢ Emergent states: “constructs that characterize properties (not behavior) of the team that
are typically dynamic in nature and vary as a function of team context, inputs, processes, and
outcomes”
- Example: (shared) emotion and cognition, cohesion, climate, transactive memory, shared
mental models, …

Cohesion (emergent state) = The force that binds members to the team and induces them to stay in
with the team.
- Task cohesion: shared commitment to the team task (I find the task important/interesting).
Correlation with performance: .27 (not very strong)
- Interpersonal cohesion: attraction to the team (I like the people in the team).
Correlation with performance: .14 (less strong then task cohesion) → we can hang out and do
something else instead.

Causality between cohesion and performance:

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper sarakruiter. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €5,48. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 77254 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€5,48  1x  verkocht
  • (0)
  Kopen