Samenvatting
Philosophy of mind, brain and behavior Summary
It is a summary of all the necessary literature and lectures :)
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 3 van de 24 pagina's
Voorbeeld 3 van de 24 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Lecture 1 - Dualism, logical behaviorism and the identity theorySubstance Dualism
• Mind = umbrella term for all mental states
• Mental = intentional (about something else, connected via thought) and/or phenomenal
(subjective, qualitative aspect)
• Substance dualism: mind is a non-physical substance (soul) that is causally connected to body
• All mental states bundled together can exist independently of body
• Soul = seed of the mind
• Descartes had very convincible argument for substance dualism
• Property dualism: the mind is produced by the physical brain, but some of its properties
(phenomenal properties) are non-physical
• Physical theory can never completely explain the mind
Psychological Behaviorism - Methodological problems with dualism
• Dualism implies introspection is the only scienti c methodology
(immaterial souls cannot be studied with other methods)
• Introspection is not objective (relies on trust, cannot be checked)
• Unconscious mental states cannot be topics of scienti c research
• Response: de ne psychology as behavioral science (believing in minds = believing in souls)
Logical behaviorism
• Background - theoretical problems with dualism
• The interaction problem: Bohemia corresponded with Descartes and
asked how soul would in uence body if its immaterial
• Descartes said pineal gland is responsible for where soul in uences
body (doesn’t explain how, cannot be proven)
• Descartes argued that its ‚just there‘ -> not everything can be
explained
• Nowadays believe in causal closed world (every phenomenon in
physical world as a physical explanation)
• Ryle wrote ‚Concept of Mind‘ -> convinced people to get rid of dualism
• Believing in separate substances means believing as mind and body as puppeteer & puppet
• Mind as hidden locus of control to explain intelligent & non-intelligent behavior (-> can only do
that if we already understand the di erence between both)
• Make a causal explanation (one caused by mind, the other not) but that explanation is not
needed because we already know it
• Mind = intelligent behavior, not a hidden cause of it
• Conceptual analysis of mind (analyze way people used word mind)
• Output similar to one huge de nition
• Mind is not a thing (that would be a category mistakes)
• Mind is something like atmosphere at a party, its in many things together
• Mental states are behavioral dispositions
=> can explain what someone thinks/mind in behavioral terms
Problems with behaviorism
• Super Stoic (somebody who is able to withstand pain) & Perfect Pretender (being able to mimic
pain behavior) —> shows experience and behavior might not be the same
• Theory lack subjective/experiential experience
Identity Theory (science oriented)
• Insight aspects missing in behaviorism
• Experimental evidence for link between mind and mental states
• Boring: ‚Consciousness is a brain process‘ -> back then consciousness was not
looked at /talked about
1
fi fl fi ff fi fi fl
, • Smart
• the mind is as manipulable as the brain
• Mentalistic language is ‚topic neutral‘ (people are not producing/defending any theory when
talking about e.g. mind)
• Dualism may have been true, but it isn’t (evidence is lacking)
• Mind = brain (not a causal role relationship)
• This is a scienti c discovery (comparable to water = H2O)
Problem
• The explanatory gap
• Stating that mental states are brain states
doesn’t explain anything • Multiple realization
• How can intentionality and phenomenal be • According to the identity theory, organisms
physical?—> how can mental activity be with di erent brains cannot have the same
electrical current types of mental state (brain state = mental
• The H2O argument is not convincing (water state)
has clear properties that together de ne • This is unlikely (e.g. pain, plasticity,
water, properties are fully explained by arti cial intelligence)
idea that water is H2O)
Literature
1) The Mind-Body Problem
• Mind: range of processes (thinking, beliefs, desires, consciousness, emotions
• Scientists and philosophers attempting to explain mind as a natural, physical phenomenon
• Di cult since thoughts, lies, hopes, fears and dreams are a strange property
• We can think about things, but thought only ever refer to things
• Experiential quality: need to experience it to know it (tastes)
• Subjektive qualities
• Seemingly non-physical properties (in terms of physical/natural sciences)
1.1) Substance dualism
• Substance dualism: people consist of material body & immaterial soul (mental states/processes)
• Immaterial soul = all conscious processes (per ceiling, dreaming, believing)
• Substance = something that can exist independently
(soul and body are distinct but not actually separated -> continuous interaction)
• Associated with religion, spiritism
• According to Descartes soul does not occupy space
Doubt as an argument
• Descartes quest for scienti c knowledge —> doubting everything we presume
• ‚I think (I doubt) therefore I exist‘
• Logically possible that all that exists is our experience of world and bodies, not the things
themselves
• Assumption that material objects cannot think
• Leibniz: x is really the same thing as y, if x and y share all their properties
• Even if identical in all properties they do not share their place in space and time
• Leibniz principal can be used to argue that Descartes thinking ‚I‘ cannot be the same entity as a
material body or brain
• Can doubt existence of our own bodies and brains but cannot doubt existence as thinking
(doubting) things
2
ffifi ff fi fi fi
, Two features of Cartesian dualism
• ‚I‘ = soul (immaterial)
• Cartesian: idea that people consist of two separable parts, believe in immaterial soul
• For some being cartesian is only to believe in immaterial soul
• Descartes thought ‚I‘ was separated from world, connected to world
only indirectly (through senses/ behavior)
• Ideas = in mind, about the world
• Thought = manipulation of ideas
• Knowledge = ideas of how world really is
Problems with arguments for dualism
• Many Philosophers nowadays think Descartes was wrong in thinking material entities cannot be
conscious in principle (e.g. computers that can reason and produce and understand language)
• What someone is entitled to think about x (e.g. whether or not they can doubt x’s existence)
should not be considered a property of x (Leibniz principle)
• When and how something is perceived is not a property of that object (no intrinsic property)
• Ontology: study of what really exists
• Idea that the mind and body are distinct
• Epistemology: study of what we know and how we know it
• distinction between mind and body in terms of what we can doubt
• Argument for substance dualism based on doubt fails because it draws ontological conclusion
form epistemological di erence
The interaction Problem
• Elisabeth of Bohemia: How can an immaterial soul cause body to move?, How can material
Cody cause changes in soul? If they belong to entirely di erent realm of reality
• Descartes initially tried locating where soul in uences body
• Argued fact that we do not know how soul body interact doe snot mean that there is no
interaction
• Nowadays causal closure of the physical realm (occurrence of every physical event has physical
explanation)
1.2) Logical behaviorism
• Dualist position relies on introspection
• Methodological problems (objective/scienti c knowledge impossible)
• Mind was made a scienti c taboo but people outside of science would still speak/think about
mind (science without mind = incomplete)
• Ryle published The Concept of Mind & showed thinking about the mind is still deeply Cartesian
• Alternative way of thinking that avoids this dilemma => logical/philosophical behaviorism
The para-mechanical hypothesis
• Ryle's critique of mind-body dualism not aimed at immateriality of the soul but idea that mind is
a closed inner realm that gets input from senses and produces outputs
• According to cartesian dualism di erence between intelligent behavior & non-intelligent
behavior is a causal di erence (intelligent behavior caused bylined, non -intelligent behavior
purely bodily)
• Para-mechanical hypothesis: idea that intelligent behavior characterized by speci c causal
origin (behavior and mind merely casually connected, mind controls behavior but behavior is not
part of the mind)
Your idea
The mind is not a causal explanation for behavior is useless!
• Ryle's point: before we come up with para-mechanical explanation we
are able to distinguish intelligent behavior from non-intelligent behavior
• Di erence is a conceptual distinction
• Hypothesis doesn’t add anything
• Much of what we call ‚mind‘ is already part of our behavior
3
ff
ffff fi ff fi fl ff fi
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper taschir. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 64438 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen