In dit bestand staat het artikel 'Tolerance and Hospitality: the key to religious plurality' van John Schimek. Het is een artikel voor het tentamen van levensbeschouwing. Ik heb de (in mijn ogen) belangrijkste aspecten geel gemaakt. Na het artikel volgen nog 2 pagina's aan aantekeningen uit de leve...
Tolerance and Hospitality: The Key to Religious Plurality
John Schimek
The basis for maintaining a peaceful and respectful multicultural society has evaded
many nations
throughout history. Its absence has led to great atrocities including, but not limited
to, genocide and terrorism. Many people point to tolerance as the key for an
appropriately accommodating plural society. After providing a definition for what
tolerance is, this paper analyzes tolerance as a virtue and excluvism’s role in its
execution. It then demonstrates that tolerance is a virtue that falls short of
providing a sustainable peacefully plural society because its determinant lies only in
action and goes on to expand on a more positive virtue that is required for a stable
diverse society–hospitality. This virtue requires mutual recognition, respect and
response rather than the simple indifference that tolerance suggests.
Many view tolerance as a virtue and therefore by Aristotle’s definition, a mean
between extremes (Irwin, 2009). It then follows that there are times to exercise
intolerance (acting against injustice for example) and times to exercise tolerance.
However, in the case of religion, exclusive beliefs complicate the execution of
tolerance because their doctrine may dictate that individuals of a foreign religion
may be excluded from some important spiritual benefits. The solution to this
problem is that strong reactions constitute religious intolerance. “Strong reaction is
when [the action] is based on seeing a man’s religion as relevant to something
which it is not really relevant” (Newman, 1978). Evangelism may be seen as acting
against another religion but it is in an area where religion is relevant and is,
therefore, still religiously tolerant. Areas where religion is never relevant include but
are not limited to the preservation of the other’s life and the pursuit of a more
flourishing life because these are areas that people of any faith (or lack thereof)
pursue – their faith is irrelevant. Any action against these areas based on religion
are strong reactions and therefore intolerant. Tolerance is seen as a mean between
extremes, but religious tolerance does not allow acting against people of other
religions in matters that are not religious in nature. Exclusive beliefs need not
conflict with this definition because a person may believe others are going to Hell
, because of their beliefs and only act against them in matters where religion is
applicable.
There is little debate that virtuously tolerant people better a society. If an entire
population were religiously tolerant, there would be less violence and injustice due
to differences in beliefs, particularly theological beliefs. Religious tolerance is
sufficient for a peaceful and respectful society but maintenance for the long term
becomes difficult when relying solely on tolerance. While tolerance may prevent
violence and injustice, it leaves undisturbed the underlying dynamic that makes
violence possible—prejudice. While discrimination would end, the prejudices may
still exist and this would leave a society very close to the violence that its prejudices
call for but that its tolerance prevents. This is a notable deficiency of religious
tolerance.
Tolerance is simply the “acceptance or endurance of something which one has a
negative attitude towards” (Newman, 1978). The word is derived from the verb “to
tolerate” which implies a certain amount of distaste for the thing tolerated. When
this definition of tolerance is applied to religion, it follows that tolerance is not the
acceptance of another’s belief but an acceptance or endurance of their holding a
belief. This distinction is important in order to maintain the integrity of one’s own
beliefs. Because religious tolerance is simply inaction where religion is not
important, it “does not foreclose the possibility of looking condescendingly, with
loathing and disdain upon the other whom one tolerates” (Conway, 2009). John Doe
may be a religiously tolerant man because he is not acting against people of other
faiths, but he could very well look at every other religion with the idea that they are
far inferior to his own. This idea of presumed superiority is the underlying dynamic
that makes the possibility of discrimination and violence ever present. In order to
achieve a peacefully plural society, one must “view that many different activities
and forms of life which are incompatible are valuable,” – a much more demanding
call (Raz, 2001). The virtue of tolerance does not require one to see any value in
any other style of life, but that one does not act in accord with those prejudices. As
such, it is not the key to a plural society; rather, we must find another more
appropriate virtue to accommodate this need. The virtue that demands one to not
simply tolerate another’s way of life but respect that way of life is hospitality.
The need for hospitality seems to be recognized by Buddhists who call “for a
different ethos… an abode of dwelling that describes a fundamental way of being in
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper Chantalcx. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €2,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
