Study notes containing all the material from lectures & important materials from the book and literature needed for the Political Communication & Journalism exam (year 2). You can use them to complement with your own notes.
Course grade = 8.3.
Also includes illustrations from theories seen in...
• Political communication = the interactions between
politics, media and the public.
• Deals with the relationship between (1) political actors,
(2) public & (3) media / journalists.
• Research is driven by the question: who shapes these relationships, and ultimately who
controls whom?
• We must focus on power relations.
• There is limited media attention, thus politicians ght for it.
A. Media Functions
What do we expect from media?
• (Free) media as fourth estate – In democracies, we want free media
independent from the state power (executive branch )
• Functions of media in Democratic society:
(1) Information – monitoring & inform the citizens (audience) what is happening in society.
(2) Education – explaining what events and facts mean for people to understanding them.
(3) Platform – Place where people exchange of ideas & ideas meet (e.g. virtual media, social
media) → Public sphere – people can discuss opinions, arguments and positions in order to reach
a consensus.
(4) Watchdog – Control over politics (governments and companies), publicity for what politics
does (wrong) – we expect journalists to be on top of issues & investigate politicians (e.g.
corruption scandals)
(5) Channel – Political, ideological opinions needs to nd their way to the people. Organizations
have the right and need to communicate w/ citizens (now is more direct).
1
fi fi
,B. What do we expect from journalists?
• Role conceptions (David Weaver) = several can happen at the same time.
• What journalists think their tasks/ responsibilities are.
• They can have several role conceptions at the same time
1. Disseminator of info = journalists provide info about events, issues.
• Fast information dissemination and veri cation of facts.
• Example = Peruvian journalist Mavila Huertas informing about electoral campaigns on TV
in Canal N.
2. Interpreter (explaining) = makes info clearer to an audience
• Make the news come alive for audience in the same way as the reporter = make sense of
events.
• Example = Peruvian journalist Marco Sifuentes informing about the protests in Ica
from agriculture complaining about working conditions in Peru in his channel “La
Encerrona”.
• They provide analyze + interpret complex issues + investigate government claims.
3. Adversarial (vs. politicians and businesses) = watchdog of media – critical about government
or companies.
• Adopting a stance of opposition + critical style in order to expose perceived wrongdoings
= politician adversary of journalist
• Example = Peruvian journalist Rosa Maria Palacios remaining critical about
measures to reopen malls by Martin Vizcarra in her channel “Sin Guion”.
4. Populist mobilizer – mobilize people = actively making people engage
in society and make their voices out + put things on the agenda + take
positions and make issues appear on agenda.
• Giving a voice to ‘ordinary’ citizens and providing entertainment.
• Example = Peruvian journalist Marco Sifuentes informing about
the protests in Lima for the illegal impeachment of Martin Vizcarra in Peru in his
channel “La Encerrona”.
• Example = Jon Oliver = Uygurs china.
1.2. US Situation about News & Journalism Bennett
• Free market is not delivering news as they should.
2
fi
,• To take the quality of news reporting under control, we must nd ways to support journalism
for it survive.
• Low interest in media or politics, little to no political knowledge.
• There are problems everywhere:
▪ Little money
▪ Distrust in the media
▪ Selective exposure
▪ Little trust in politics
1.3. Negative Campaigning
• Negative campaigning (a.k.a. attack politics or mudslinging) = characteristic of the message
• The ‘tone’ of the message (direction of message)
• Negative = attack or criticism against the opponents programs, ideas, policies,
record, … (decrease opponents support)
• Positive = promotion of one’s programs, ideas, policies, record… (increase your
support)
• BUT It is not necessarily so extreme.
• Purpose: Provide electoral bene ts:
• Undermining rivals’ competence evaluations
• Demobilizing support for the targeted politician or party
• Mobilizing supporters
• Persuading undecided and risk-averse voters to cast their vote for the ‘lesser evi’l.
• Two types:
1. Policy Attacks = they do not attack the opponent on his character, but in
something they did wrong (e.g. policies)
2. Character Attacks = they attack the opponent on his character, not his policies or
wrongdoings.
• When is a campaign negative?
• Depends on the proportion of negative messages (whether + positive or + negative
messages in the campaign).
• Negativity =
• in the eye of the beholder – intensity of negativity should be taken into
account as well.
3
fi fi
, • People perceive negativity in di erent ways
• People tend to evaluate intensity of attack
• Stronger attack = seen as worse/ more negative
• BUT def. of negative campaigning is perceived in extremes =
either is or not an attack.
• Ex: Shows distribution of all answers – we tend to evaluate the
intensity of the attack.
• has a clear normative de cit: votes dislike negativity.
• BUT Currently not the most negative campaign ever in the US (according to
US citizens).
• US 2020 Not the most interesting campaign
• Haselmayer et al. (2019) =
• Negative campaigning in uences political support + —> used to gain media
attention.
• Media like negativity (part of media logic) = negative campaigning easily gets
attention
• Traditional media still important source of info.
• Attention needed by political actors to convey their campaign
messages to broad public.
• Opportunity for less powerful politicians (especially for rank-and-
le politicians like MPs)
• News value = negativity = factor more likely to become news.
• Best NOT to attack on your own best issues, but on issues owned by the target.
• Attack them on their best issue – weaken them.
• Issue-ownership = when a political actor or party is considered as best suitable to
deal w/ certain issue (e.g. a green party about the environment).
• More media attention probably better for those issues owned by the target
than your own.
• Parties address these issues important to audiences.
A. Negative campaigning in US
• Occurs often in the US = most ads are negative.
• Ex: Heil Trump
• Vali & Nai (2020): Negative campaigning is not just done in the US, but worldwide = candidate
pro le + context matters (moderates).
4
fi fi
flfi ff
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper AndreaValdivia. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,38. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
