College aantekeningen
Summary Emperical Economics: WEEK 1 - WEEK 6 LECTURE SLIDES
This summary contains all relevant material mentioned in the lecture slides of week 1 till week 6. Application videos are not included.
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 4 van de 46 pagina's
Voorbeeld 4 van de 46 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Key takeaways for each weekWEEK 1
● Difference between correlation and causality
● Introduced the potential outcomes model
● Discussed what are the parameters of interest: ATE & ATET
● Policy makers and economists are often interested in causal effects.
● Potential outcomes model provides a statistical framework to analyze causal effect.
● If (in a nonexperimental setting) some outcome is correlated to treatment, this does
not necessary imply causality.
● Social experiments provide a straightforward approach to estimate causal effects.
● Why are there not more social experiments:
○ 1 Social experiments may be costly.
○ 2 Ethical considerations.
● Selection issues are often present and complicate analysis.
● Selection can (often) be considered as omitted variables problem.
● Omitted variables may cause biased and inconsistent estimates.
WEEK 2
● There are many reasons why regressors may be endogenous (omitted variables,
reversed causality, measurement error, sample selection).
● Instrumental variables can deal with endogenous regressors.
● What a good instrument is depends on the application.
● Showed that we can estimate an IV using the 2SLS estimator
● Important that the instrumental variable is exogenous.
● IV estimators are not unbiased, but are consistent.
● Bias can be severe if instrument is weak (low predictive power).
● IV estimates the average treatment effect for the compliers (LATE).
● Compliers are individuals who change treatment status when the instrument changes
value.
● Compliers cannot be identified directly.
● Biggest challenge is finding good instruments (exogenous and relevant).
● What a good instrument is depends on the application.
WEEK 3
● Randomized experiments ensure that causal effects are estimated.
● Variation in scale, and field or laboratory.
● However, design crucial, cannot correct mistakes in design ex-post.
● Balancing table way to check ex-post whether randomization was done correctly.
● Different alternatives for full randomization if that is complicated/unfeasible
● Power analysis computes required size of experiment.
● Possible complications for simple analysis: nonrandom selection, attrition,
noncompliance, externalities.
1
, ● Attrition is only problematic if related to potential outcomes (otherwise only
reduction of power).
● External validity (population, context, administration, equilibrium effects, Hawthorne
effect).
WEEK 4
● Regression discontinuity allows estimation of causal effects in cases where treatment
is endogenous
● Requires a discontinuous jump of treatment probability in the running variable
● If the probability of treatment jumps from 0 to 1, discontinuity is sharp, otherwise it is
fuzzy
● Important to check:
○ Specification of relationship between outcome and running variable
○ (may be non-linear)
○ Bunching (manipulating running variable)
○ Continuity of other covariates around the threshold
● Various models for considering dummy endogenous variables.
● Linear probability models are easy to analyze and easy to interpret.
● However, functional form may be inconvenient.
● Logit and Probit models guarantee that probabilities are bounded between 0 and 1.
● Interpretation of coefficients is not straightforward.
● Link to consumer choice: model choice based on latent utility (unobserved, only
observe chosen outcome)
WEEK 5
● Panel data describe observations of individuals/regions/firms/etc. over time.
● Panel data models can deal with unit specific effects and can solve a lot of omitted
variable bias problems.
● Fixed effects or random effects model: Random effects model more efficient but need
stronger assumptions.
● Usual panel data models assume strict exogeneity of regressors.
● Dealing with lagged-endogenous variables uses instrumental variable methods.
● Policy changes can be used for evaluation with observational data
● The before-after estimator compares outcomes before and after a policy is
implemented
● To correct for other things that change over time, subtract change in control group:
difference-in-differences estimator
● DD-estimator provides causal effect if common trend assumption holds
● Look at pre-trends and do placebo tests to investigate plausibility
● DD-estimate can be obtained by performing simple regression
2
,WEEK 6
● Heritabilities of social science outcomes is considerable
● Genetic markers influence social science outcomes through non-deterministic
pathways that are likely to difficult to disentangle
● Social science outcomes are likely influenced by a very large number of SNPs, each
with tiny effect sizes
● Large sample sizes are key to achieve well-powered analyses
● GWAS methodology in combination with increasingly large sample sizes have
resulted in the discovery of many genome-wide significant SNPs for social science
outcomes
● Causality of genetic effects found in current GWAS studies can be
● questioned
● Principal components control for population stratification, but imperfectly
● Better solutions are possible when genetic data of family members is included in the
analysis, but such data is still too scarce for use in GWAS
● Polygenic scores are a summary measure of genetic endowments at the individual
level, that are sufficiently predictive to be used in “regular” econometric analyses
3
, Week 1.1 - Instrumental variables
Difference between correlation and causality
Causality is about questions such as:
● What would have happened
● What would happen
→ This requires knowing about unobserved outcomes, because we only observe one potential
outcome.
E.g. ‘Do people earn more if they complete university education?’
Correlation is a measure for the association between two variables.
→ One approach would be to compare those with university education to those without
university education.
However, correlation between D and Y can be caused by
1. A causal effect of D on Y
2. A causal effect of Y on D
3. Omitted variables: Z affects both D and Y
Potential outcome model
= general model to think about causal effects.
● Assume a treatment or choice variable can take two values (0/1)
● Each individual i has two potential outcomes, Y1i* with treatment and Y0i* without
treatment.
● Only one potential outcome is observed (factual). The unobserved outcome is the
counterfactual outcome.
● For an individual the effect of participating in the treatment equals:
● ∆i is always an unobserved random variable, because only one of the random
variables Y1i* and Y0i* is observed. (= the fundamental problem of causal inference)
4
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper jtimmermans. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €7,53. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 52510 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen