College aantekeningen
Criminal law
- Vak
- Criminal law
- Instelling
- Tilburg University (UVT)
Aantekeningen van het vak Criminal law, van de Global Law studie.
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 4 van de 61 pagina's
Voorbeeld 4 van de 61 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
LECTURE 1● Substantive criminal law: field of law that determines which acts are criminal.
○ Criminal law protects legal interests (e.g. life)
○ But also used as form of governance to regulate minor wrongs
○ ‘Mala in se’(= evil in itself, evil/wrong by nature, like murder/theft) vs. ‘mala
prohibita’(= not inherently evil, but are still prohibited by law, aimed at regulating
society, like having a valid driver's license)
● Criminal procedure/Procedural law: the formal steps that can/must be taken to
enforce substantive criminal law.
○ Contains rules that regulate:
○ Investigation (e.g. searches and interrogations)
○ Trial
○ Appeal
○ E.g. ‘under which circumstances is a person considered a suspect?’
● Criminal law is created by:
○ The state/federal legislator
○ Lower legislators (municipalities)
○ Supranational institutions (e.g. EU)
○ Criminal courts (in common law countries)
● Main sources of criminal law:
○ Criminal Codes
○ Acts of Parliament/Congress (statutes)
○ Case law
○ Treaties and other international regulations
○ Doctrine (scholarly writings) (however, this is not binding, merely a source of
inspiration)
○ General principles of law
● Criminal courts:
○ National level
■ 1. Lower courts
■ 2. Courts of appeal
■ 3. Supreme court
○ Human rights courts
■ Africa (Tanzania)
■ Europe (Strassbourg)
■ Americas (San Jose)
○ International level
■ International Criminal Court (ICC)
■ Criminal tribunals (ICTYugoslavia, ICTRwanda, SCSL)
, ● Why do we need criminal law?
○ Aim: to maintain and restore order in society and to prevent lynch law(= the
punishment of presumed crimes or offenses usually by death without due
process of law).
○ Functions of criminal law:
■ Declaratory (= protecting and emphasizing values of society)
■ Preventive (= prevent potential crimes from being committed)
■ Censuring (= endorses importance of norms, and through punishment no
more temptation to commit crimes)
○ Three views on punishment:
■ 1. Retributive theory (those who commit crimes, deserve to be punished,
in order to restore the balance that has been upset by the harmful act)
Focuses on PAST.
■ 2. Utilitarian theory (punishments are justified by the benefits they can
have in the future for the society as a whole, crimes affect happiness, and
society strives towards happiness) Focuses on FUTURE.
■ 3. Hybrid theory (rebutive + utilitarian theory mixed!)
● Aims of punishment:
○ 1. Retribution = those who commit crimes deserve to be punished
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
○ 2. Incapacitation = form of revenge
○ 3. Deterrence = impose punishment, people will be put off from committing
crimes, functions as a kind of ‘threat’
■ I. general deterrence → more general, not aimed at one person, but at
the public
■ II. special deterrence → aims at discouraging an individual person,
directly concentrated on that one individual
○ 4. Rehabilitation = attempts to reintegrate the offender into society, rehabilitate
○ 5. Restoration = restore what was first destroyed
From 1 → retributive theory
From 2-5 → utilitarian theory
Inherent tension between different aims
● Conditions/requirements for criminal liability:
○ I. Act (including actus reus) → objective side
■ A willed, voluntary act (however, not all actions have to be conscious in
the entire act, but the person did have a certain control over his actions!);
■ Committed by a human being of a certain age;
■ Caught by the legal definition of a criminal offence in a certain country
(actus reus);
○ II. Causation
■ Causal link between act and consequence:
■ X would not have happened for Y;
, ■ No causal link? → No criminal liability!
○ III. Fault (mens rea) → subjective side
■ Defendant must have acted with a ‘guilty mind’;
■ E.g. he must have intentionally killed the victim
○ IV. Wrongdoing (= no justification)
■ Under certain circumstances, the act may be justified;
■ E.g. on grounds of self-defence
■ Conduct may still be harmful, but is no longer considered ‘wrong’
○ V. Blameworthiness (= no excuse)
■ Under certain circumstances, a defendant may be excused;
■ E.g. on grounds of duress or involuntary intoxication
■ If there is a legal excuse, then the defendant did not act blameworthy
I-III → pre-conditions
● Scope of criminal law: jurisdiction
○ 1. A government’s power to exercise authority over all persons and things within
its territory.
○ 2. A court’s power to decide a case.
● Example: A Danish man who lives in the US assaults an Indian woman on a Dutch KLM
flight from Washington D.C. to Amsterdam.
○ Which of these countries can claim jurisdiction?
● Heads of jurisdiction
○ Territorial jurisdiction:
■ Extended to include vessels (every state has the right to create criminal
prohibitions which are binding on every person on its territory*) *ALSO
applies on the board of all airplanes registered to that country!
○ Extraterritorial jurisdiction:
■ Nationality principle (state may exercise jurisdiction over its nationals,
REGARDLESS of where they are)
● Active → state can assert jurisdiction over the conduct of its
nationals outside of its borders bc the perpetrator has the
nationality of that country
● Passive → jurisdiction over acts of the offender bc the victim is its
national
■ Universality principle (state has the power to assert jurisdiction over
serious international crimes, bc some crimes are so troublesome as to
constitute a threat to national peace and security. that all states have a
legitimate interest the prescription and enforcement of such crimes, like
piracy and slave trade)
○ Double criminality:
■ The particular act must constitute a crime in both jurisdictions (the
jurisdiction where the crime was committed and the jurisdiction where the
defendant is put on trial)
, LECTURE 2
● What is criminalisation? → “The process by which behaviors and individuals are
transformed into crimes and criminals”
○ Criminalisation:
■ Content of criminal law depends on societal values
■ Regional + temporal differences
○ Example: decriminalisation in homosexuality (used to be a crime, but many
country decriminalized it)
■ England & Wales in 1967
■ India in 2018
○ Example: decriminalisation of marijuana
■ Uruguay in 2013 (effective 2018)
■ Canada in 2018
● Why do we need criminalisation theories/principles?
○ Consistency (legality principle → law needs to be consistent)
○ Criminal law is most coercive instrument
● Theories of criminalisation
○ Utilitarian: criminalisation for the greater good (but who gets to decide what the
‘greater good’ is? And what is it?)
○ Law & economics: cost-benefit analysis (may also lead to unjust results)
○ Legal moralism: criminalisation of immoral conduct
● Threshold criteria: harm & wrong
●
● Harm
○ Harm is a setback of interests; causes negative effect
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper alinagirbea. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €15,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 67474 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen