100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Introduction to International Organizations LECTURES €6,49   In winkelwagen

College aantekeningen

Introduction to International Organizations LECTURES

1 beoordeling
 5 keer bekeken  0 keer verkocht

All first year lectures about International Organizations given by Gisela Hirschmann at Leiden University during the first year in 2022/2023. The grade I got for the exam was a 7.5. Good luck with studying!

Voorbeeld 4 van de 40  pagina's

  • 17 januari 2023
  • 40
  • 2022/2023
  • College aantekeningen
  • Gisela hirschmann
  • Alle colleges
Alle documenten voor dit vak (2)

1  beoordeling

review-writer-avatar

Door: famkechristina • 9 maanden geleden

I guess some good insights but really is missing quite a lot of crucial information so really not sufficient enough for the hard exam

reply-writer-avatar

Door: MariaStudy • 9 maanden geleden

Hello! Thank you for leaving a review; as is states in the information about the summary, this is a summary from last year, therefore some stuff might have changed compared to this year's lectures, unfortunately. I am glad it was of use to you, thank you for the three stars!

reply-writer-avatar

Door: famkechristina • 9 maanden geleden

Hey I understand but even then it would still be missing some substancial stuff - but you know its a summary so yeh...

avatar-seller
MariaStudy
International Organizations - Dr. Gisela Hirschmann
International Organizations: Politics, Law and Practice
Tuesday 26 Oct, 13.00: Exam


Class 1: Introduction: Concepts and Characteristics

● International Organizations - What are they? Why do they exist? And why do we need
them?
● IO’s:
○ Established by states
○ (Usually) based on inter-state treaty
○ Regional or international
○ UN, NATO, EU, ECOWAS, IMF, World Food Programme

IO’s are a specific class of international institutions. An institution is a body of norms, rules
and practices that shape behavior and expectations, without necessarily having the physical
character of an international organization. Besides formal IO’s, there are also informal IO’s.
They don't have the same structure as formal IO’s.

International Organization:
➔ Formal treaty base
➔ Bureaucracy/headquarters
➔ Formal rules and procedures
➔ Regular state meetings
➔ At least 3 member states

● NGO’s (non-governmental organizations):
○ Established by non-state actors
○ ‘Common purpose’
○ Local national or transnational
○ Bonobo Conservation Initiative (local), Human Rights Watch, Coalition for
the International Criminal Court

Categorisation:

1. Membership
a. Universal: every state can become a member (UN)
b. Limited: only some states can become a member (EU) (regional or cultural
differences, etc.)
2. Competence
a. Comprehensive/general purpose: IO deals with many different topics (UN)
b. Limited/issue-specific: IO focuses on a specific topic (WTO)

, 3. Function
a. Rule-making organization: makes policy (UN)
b. Operational organization: executes policy (IAEA)
4. Decision-making authority
a. Intergovernmental: decision taken by all members based on horizontal authority
i. Pooled sovereignty (NATO)
b. Supranational: decision taken by organizational body designated by members based
on vertical authority (very practical, but tension-causing as well)
i. Delegated sovereignty (EU)

Organizations move beyond their original purpose, so it's a developing process, and not as
black and white as it now seems.

Three forces of IO’s in world politics:

1. Obligation
a. Direct (obligations that were known from the start (treaties)
b. Indirect (new obligations that arise at a later point, ones that members didn’t
consider when taking part)
2. Compliance: getting member states to get to do what the organization stands for:
their interests can differ from the general purpose of the IO
a. Explicit (less common, a direct mechanism stated on paper, like (automatic)
sanctions)
b. Implicit (more common, pressure in the environment the IO creates)
3. Enforcement: What can an IO do to sanction a member if they don’t comply?)
a. Direct (very few IO’s, serious sanctions like military actions or upholding
income)
b. Indirect (naming and shaming procedures)

IO’s as Actors:

Legally: IGO’s are independent entities with legal personality.
Politically: independent actorness through social recognition.
● Collective actors are able to do what its constituent parts are unable to do
alone.
● Empirically evident through practices of influencing world politics.


IO’s as Fora:

Physical forum/arena for debate and negotiation:
● Exchange of interests and information
● Policy-making

, IO’s as Tools:

Instruments and tools in the hands of their member states, pursuing their own personal
interests. This can cause tensions and problems when one member states interests differ
(greatly) from the common purpose. Like, the International Court of Justice and the IMF.

, Class 2: Theory, Methods and International Organizations

Neorealism:

● ‘Neorealists argue that states would refrain from giving IO’s too much power.’
What is the underlying logic for this argument? (Key: How they conceive the
international system, state interest)

The international system is defined by states. There is no superior power above them because
of the nature of the system and the relationship between states, which is anarchic.

That is why they wouldn’t see IO’s as an actor to the extent of a superior authority, which
makes it impossible to give IO’s too much power, because this would inevitably have to make
IO’s superior, a scenario the states do not recognize to be possible.

The core aspect in the interests of the state is to secure power and security, and by referring
some power to IO’s, that goes against their own interest. Powerful states create IO’s in their
own interest, but keep their power within limits they were mandated to do. States are very
careful when and what they join and agree with.

● Which IO that supports this argument comes to mind?

NATO.

Institutionalism:
(parts of what Hurd describes under liberalism and realism)



● What is similar and different between neo-realists and institutionalists? (Key: Think
about anarchy, the nature of states and the role of IO’s)

Their view is the same when it comes to anarchy. Both sides see the international system as
anarchic, however, they draw different conclusions from it.

States in the realist atmosphere are required to possess more power than others: they are
self-serving (wanting as much power and protection as possible), according to neo-realists..
Institutions think they need to cooperate (for a general and shared goal) and are more willing
to do this because of their interdependence.

Both sides see the system as anarchic, but institutionalists see it as anarchic with
interdependence!

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper MariaStudy. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 79373 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€6,49
  • (1)
  Kopen