These are college notes from the course introduction to Logic for first-year students CSAI on the university of Tilburg.
Dit zijn hoorcollege aantekeningen van de cursus Introduction to Logic voor eerstejaars CSAI studenten aan de universiteit van Tilburg.
1. Ferry is a dog Premise
2. All dogs are canines Premise
3. Ferry is a canine Conclusion
Argument: any collection of premises together with a conclusion
Good argument: would let you derive the conclusion based on its premises.
Bad argument:
Content: One or more premises are false
Form: The conclusion does not follow from the premises
Initial thought: The conclusion “follows from” the premises. Given that all the premises are true, the
conclusion therefore must also be true.
Valid argument: An argument is valid when it is 1. impossible for all the premises to be true and 2.
the conclusion to be false.
(!) Remember that validity is NOT about the truth or falsity of the premises, but it is about
whether it is possible for the premises to be true and the conclusion to be false.
1. Ferry is a sausage
2. Ferry is not cute Valid arguments
3. All non-cute sausages are feline
4. Ferry is a feline
Sound argument: An argument is sound when it is valid AND all of its premises are true.
Logic: The science of settling whether an argument is valid or not.
Deductive arguments: deriving a conclusion from premises
Inductive argument: based on past instances and generalizing future instances
Abductive argument: instance of the best explanation, (trying to connect two premises the best way)
Valid deductive arguments give an unbreakable connection between the premises and the
conclusion.
Inductive and abductive arguments do not necessarily express an unbreakable connection
between the truth of the premises and the conclusion.
Assertoric question: A question that can only be true or false.
, Michiel de Folter
Jointly consistent: a sentence is jointly consistent when all the premises can be true together
Necessary true: A sentence that can only be true and never false
Necessary falsehood: A sentence that can only be false and never true
Contingent: A sentence that is possible to be true and possible to be false
Truth functional logic: whatever you put in for A or B, it will always be a valid argument.
1. A 1. A or B 1. Not A and B 1. If A then B
2. If A then B 2. Not A 2. A 2. Not B
3. So B 3. So B 3. So Not B 3. So Not A
The validity is given by the structure of these arguments, the content of the premises and their falsity
or truth does not matter at all.
Limitation of TFL (propositional logic): When given the premises 1. “The pope is a bachelor” and 2.
“Therefore, the pope is a male”, TFL does not recognize this as a valid statement,
As humans we know that “A bachelor is a single male” and when we insert that premise
alongside the other two, the argument above should be valid!, but for that to be true we
would need the knowledge of what a bachelor is which we as humans know, but a computer
by instance wouldn’t.
Atomic sentences: the basic building blocks of which all other sentences are built.
We go from an atomic sentence to an uppercase letter (TFL), so
Dave is hungry H
Lincoln was shot S
Ferry is awake or Ferry is snoring A or N
Dave is hungry and Ferry is snoring H and N
HC 2: Truth Functional Logic
Atomic sentence: Transcribing English or Dutch or whatever language into capital letters.
Connectives: allows you to construct more difficult sentences.
Symbol Name of symbol Rough meaning
¬ Negation “It is not the case that …”
ꓥ Conjunction “both … and …”
“… but …”
“Although … , …”
ꓦ Disjunction “Neither … nor …”
→ Conditional “if … then …”
“… only if …”
, Michiel de Folter
↔ Biconditional “… if and only if…”
Negation:
C: Rex is a cat
Rex is not a cat Paraphrasing It is not the case that Rex is a cat
So: ¬C
Conjunction:
J: Ferry is a dog
V: Vlad is a dog
So: F ꓥ V
Disjunction:
Either Amanda will take a nap or she will come to the party
NVP
Exclusive “or”: excludes the possibility of both disjuncts to be true.
Inclusive “or”: allows both disjuncts to be true.
V always means inclusive or.
Conditional:
If Amanda is in Tilburg, then she is in the Netherlands
T: Amanda is in Tilburg Antecedent
N Amanda is in the Netherlands Consequent
TN
Use vs Mention:
“Dave” mentions the word “Dave”
When we talk about Dave we use the name Dave to talk about the person.
“Dave” is the name of Dave.
Object language: The language we talk in.
Metalanguage: The language we use to talk about the object language.
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper Maggoe. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €5,48. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
