100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Summary ALL lectures of Quality and safety (grade 8,5) €8,99
In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Summary ALL lectures of Quality and safety (grade 8,5)

 18 keer bekeken  0 keer verkocht

well written, bulletpointed

Voorbeeld 4 van de 34  pagina's

  • 1 maart 2023
  • 34
  • 2022/2023
  • Samenvatting
Alle documenten voor dit vak (11)
avatar-seller
julianaijlstra
Introduction
Quality and safety:
● Importance:
○ Relevant in times of crisis, but also in everyday work
■ How to intervene
■ How we think about this work in general
○ Meanwhile:
■ Patient care may be substandard, unsafe, fragmented, variable, costly
■ Efforts to improve Q&S are marginally on the agenda of healthcare
organizations
■ Existing power structures/hierarchies prevent quality improvement (QI)
■ Instruments for QI are poorly understood
■ Demographic changes, aging population, rise of comorbidities
● Definition of quality:
○ Institute of Medicine (IoM):
■ 6 dimensions (WHO has same criteria):
● Effectiveness
● Efficiency
● Equity
● Patient centeredness
● Safety
● Timeliness
■ Definition: the degree to which health services for individuals and
populations increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes and are
consistent with current professional knowledge
● = relative and dynamic definition of quality
○ Dutch quality, complaints and disputes act (Wkkgz):
■ Same criteria as IoM, but replaces Equity with Transparency
● In practice:
○ What's out there:
■ Instruments available for Q&S: clinical guidelines, accreditation bodies,
performance indicators, (information) technologies, patient participation
tools
■ Q&S are human accomplishments: you need to take into account the
work that people do
○ Problems, explanations for lacking Q&S:
■ Instruments are badly implemented
■ Evidence of how instruments work is lacking
■ Interactions between instruments and context of use are unclear
■ Interaction between instruments is unclear
○ Difficulty to research:
■ Practical limitations:
● A lot we dont know
● Local insights are rarely universally applicable

, ● Research is often focused on ‘simple’ interventions in ‘complex’
environments
■ Contrasting views on whats important:
● Healthcare professionals, managers, policy makers tend to focus
on instruments/tools/structures - but often ignore practices of Q&S
○ Characteristics we discern:
■ Q&S are multi-layered:
● Interactions between macro, meso and micro levels of care
■ Q&S are dynamic:
● Changes at each level have consequences for quality instruments
(eg changing use of guidelines through time)
● Interactions between instruments, organizations, laws and
protocols
■ Q&S are emergent:
● Q&S emerge from care practices; they arent inherent properties of
care
● Consequences of interventions are unpredictable
○ What to do:
■ Reflexive + contextual approaches
■ Less top-down focus on implementing interventions
■ More focus on making healthcare resilient

Organizing for quality framework
Organizing for Quality, framework by Bate et al:
● 6 challenges:
○ Structural (blue):
■ Challenge around structuring, planning and coordinating quality efforts
■ Good structures are essential for organizing quality effort: eg strategies,
information sharing, coordination, dedicated teams
■ Too much focus → bureaucratization, fragmentation, decoupling
○ Cultural (red):
■ Challenge around giving quality a shared, collective meaning, value and
significance within the organization
■ Essential for sustaining change and for processes of sense-making, eg
culture of reflexivity, culture of innovation, culture of openness and
sharing
■ There are also dysfunctional cultures (eg clan culture and bullying)
○ Educational (green):
■ Challenge around creating and nurturing a learning process to support
continual improvement
■ Essential for accumulating/disseminating knowledge, reflecting on
emergent effect + organizational barriers, other forms of learning also
important
■ To much focus: can become pedantic, or lead to navel gazing

,○ Political (yellow):
■ Challenge around addressing the politics and negotiating the buy-in,
conflict, and relationships of change
■ Essential to engage clinical staff and senior leaders, empower patients
and staff, link with stakeholders
■ Too much politics: power play, resisting of change, impossible politics
○ Technological & physical (pink):
■ Challenge around designing physical infrastructures and technological
systems supportive of quality efforts
■ Physical infrastructure is essential to support/govern quality work (eg ICT
systems, patient-friendly designs of physical infrastructure, user-friendly
design of equipment)
■ Too much focus on technology: leads to overly mechanistic approaches,
creates workarounds and exhaustion
○ Emotional (white):
■ Challenge around inspiring, energizing and mobilizing people by linking
QI to inner sentiments and deeper commitments
■ Creates movement for improvement, makes quality something that ‘has to
be done’, eg engaging with patient stories, inspirational leadership,
motivational speakers, champions, activists
■ Too much focus: leads to uncertainty, laissez-faire policies
○ → inner context:
■ Organization performance
■ Organization size
■ Organization structure
○ → outer context:
■ Social & cultural environments
■ Political & regulatory environments
■ Market & resource environments
■ Technological environments
○ Model:

, ■

Structural challenge
Structural challenge:
● Bate et al:
● Too much focus:
○ Bureaucratization
○ Fragmentation
○ Decoupling: gap between policies and implementation
■ 2 forms (Bromley & Powell, 2012):
● Policy-practice decoupling (classical explanation of decoupling):
○ Institutional adoption of rules/policies is largely symbolic
and inconsequential
○ ‘Ceremonial window dressing’
○ Rules are systematically violated and unimplemented
○ Formal policies are disconnected from daily practices!
○ Daily practices may/may not be linked to intended
outcomes
○ Eg, workarounds:

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper julianaijlstra. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €8,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 53920 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€8,99
  • (0)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd