Samenvatting
Summary ALL literature for quality and safety (grade 8,5)
in depth, well written, bulletpointed summary of literature for quality and safety
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 4 van de 31 pagina's
Voorbeeld 4 van de 31 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Verkoper
Volgen
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
https://www.eur.nl/sites/corporate/files/QUASER-GuideForPayers_0Bate, Mendel & Robert - Organizing for quality: the improvement
journeys of leading hospitals in Europe and the United States
Chapter 10 - Towards a process model of organizing for quality
Key factors that make a healthcare organization to be one of high quality:
1) Developing the right culture
2) Attracting and retaining the right people
3) Devising and updating the right in-house processes
4) Giving staff the right tools to do their job
Quality improvement models:
● Often describe stages + steps, but tell us little about the process
● The process: not as much a sequence of steps/factors, but what happens between
them; this is what connects everything
○ roads/processes to QI:
■ Most often: structure and culture paths
■ Regular: learning and politics
■ Not often: emotional and technological
Chapter 9 (Not mandatory) - A practitioner’s codebook for the quality
journey
Health care quality improvements QI:
● 6 common challenges, and what to learn (chapter 10):
○ 1) structural challenge: structuring, planning, coordinating quality efforts
■ Focus on getting the basic structure in place
■ Establishment of quality systems, structures and roles, data and
monitoring systems, and training progras, strategic leadership for QI
■ Problem: no effective structural process, result is fragmentation and a
general lack of synergy and joined-upness between the different parts of
the organization doing QI
○ 2) political challenge: addressing the politics and negotiating the buy in, conflict
and relationships of change surrounding any QI effort
■ Deal with conflicts and tensions
■ Clinical engagement, staff and patient empowerment, and partnership
working with external stakeholders
■ Problem: no effective political process, result is disillusionment, because
if a change process will be made difficult because of politics in the
organization, people will give up trying
○ 3) cultural challenge: giving ‘quality’ a shared, collective meaning, value and
significance within the organization
, ■ Take time to build camaraderie and strong teamwork
■ Creating a shared mindset or ethos around quality (culture of an
organization as a social construction)
■ Culture is important in the sustainability aspect: anchoring and fixing the
change in new habits of thinking and patterns of behavior
● Essentially a social accomplishment, incorporated in the binding
commitments that people make to each other in relation to
innovation/change
■ Problem: no effective cultural process, result is evaporation because the
change has not been properly anchored or become a routine, as soon as
the current program or project stops the change will also stop
○ 4) educational challenge: creating and nurturing a learning process that supports
continuous improvement
■ Learn from your mistakes
■ Knowledge harvesting, experimentation and piloting, and leaders who
take a mentorship role to encourage reflective practice and personal
development
■ Problem: no effective educational process, result is amnesia or
frustration, because lessons and knowledge are forgotten
○ 5) emotional challenge: inspiring, energizing, and mobilizing people by linking QI
to inner sentiments and deeper commitments
■ Feel and share the passion for getting to the top
■ Problem: no effective emotional process, result is disinterest and fade-out
because the change effort will run out of energy and forward movement
○ 6) physical and technological challenge: designing physical systems and
technological infrastructure that support improvement and quality of care
■ Avoid being distracted too early by high tech solutions
■ What is needed to regularize quality and deliver it on a routine
■ Problem: when there isnt an effective design process, the result will be
exhaustion, as people run around trying to do it all by hand/word/mouth,
not having the luxury of a system/standardized set of routines to take the
weight of necessary everyday activities
● Overall lesson: don’t look down, manage the context
Bromley & Powell - From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk:
decoupling in the contemporary world
Why do organizations adopt formal policies:
● 1) to secure legitimacy
○ Incorporate elements that are externally legitimated by socially constructed
beliefs in the external environment, regardless of their effects on technical tasks
a hand
● 2) in order to avoid legal sanctions and the glare of public opinions
,Decoupling:
● Definition: disconnecting a link between certain aspects that are seen as important within
organization; aspects that normally used to have a relation/connection, but this relation
isnt clearly visible anymore
● 2 types (which is more important):
○ 1) policy-practice decoupling:
■ Description: formal rules systematically violated and unimplemented +
evaluation/inspection isnt present or is intended as symbolic, it's so vague
that it provides little relevant info
■ Key insight: explains why organizations routinely adopt policies and dont
implement them
■ Key consequences: legitimacy/resources/both → adoption may
be ceremonial; buffering of core activities → may promote
efficiency or protect interests or internal constituents
■ = so gap between policy and practice, because employees make
exceptions to certain rules → this becomes standardized so
policy isnt carries out as expected; studies why/how managers
fail to/avoid implementing formal rules over time
■ More likely if:
● Adoption is motivated by legitimacy rather than technical demands
● It is early in the adoption process
● There is weak capacity to implement policies
● Internal constituents do not reinforce external pressures
■ May decrease because:
● More emphasis on implementing policies
● Policies are selected in part because they can be implemented
and measured
● Pressures in environment that drive creation of policies may
independently be changing practices and outcomes, regardless of
policy implementation
○ 2) means-ends decoupling:
■ Description: rules/policies implemented, but with uncertain relationship to
outcomes; may be multiple unrelated goals
■ Key insight: explains why organizations dedicate resources to practices
that have little known relationship to intended goals
■ Key consequences:
● 1) internal complexity: internal organization structure become
increasingly complex
○ implementation contributes to organizational heterogeneity
and complexity;
● 2) endemic reform: organizations persist in a state of perpetual
reform
, ○ if evaluation/inspection are present this generates
continual periods of reform when inconsistencies are
revealed;
● 3) diverting resources: resources are often diverted away from
core goals
○ arational allocation of resources from purely instrumental
perspective, can direct time/attention away from core goals
● (legitimacy)
■ = so gap between resources and goals → work doesnt reach
intended goal; so policy is implemented but doesn’t relate to the
core tasks of an organization; to understand internal structure of
organization + heterogeneity in process
■ More important because we are becoming an increasingly
managerial world that emphasizes evaluation/standardization
/benchmarking → so policy-practice becomes less common and
means-end more
■ More likely if:
● In contexts where the effects of actions are difficult to measure
● Over time, as raionalizing pressures expand into arenas where
outcomes are hard to measure
● When conflicting pressures are more institutionalized in hard or
soft law, especially when law emphasizes procedure over
outcomes
● When internal constituents champion an external cause
● When the rationalized environment is fragmented, due to:
○ Direct accountability to a greater number of stakeholders
through eg diverse funding streams
○ Greater societal pressure due to visibility because of
size/status/perception of public interest
○ Fragmentation may increase over time with worldwide
adoption of New Public Management and neo-liberal
ideologies
○ Higher fragmentation in contexts where traditional forms of
authority are weak
■ Why does this kind occur in organizations?
● Goals havent been achieved; so organizations use this kind of
decoupling because they want to have more quality and less
bureaucracy
● They want to give more time to patients (= patient centered) +
agreement with staff(management) and local solutions
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper julianaijlstra. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €9,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 53920 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen