Samenvatting
Summary of the article: "Work group diversity and group performance"
Summary of the article "Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda" written by Knippenberg, Dreu & Homan
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 1 van de 4 pagina's
Voorbeeld 1 van de 4 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
2 beoordelingen
Door: MichielvanEldik • 4 jaar geleden
Door: sfturner2 • 6 jaar geleden
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Summary: Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda –Knippenberg, Dreu & Homan
Teams have become more diverse in terms of their demographic composition over the years and this
will continue. In addition, companies are increasingly using cross-functional teams, which means that
the teams have a higher functional diversity. Diversity has both positive and negative influences upon
performance.
Diversity refers to the differences between individuals on any attribute that may lead to the perception
that another person is different from self. Those attributes refer to an almost infinite number of
dimensions. Broadly, it can be separated in 2 categories:
Social category diversity: differences in readily detectable attributes, such as sex, age and ethnicity.
Informational/functional diversity: differences in less visible underlying attributes that are more job-
related, such as functional and educational background.
There are two main traditions in research in work-group diversity and performance:
The social categorization perspective: similarities and differences are used as a basis for categorizing
self and others into groups, with ensuing categorizations between one’s own in-group and one or
more out-groups. In-group members are mostly more trusted and consequently favored. This can
lead to inter-subgroups within a work group. Therefore, the more homogenous the group, the
higher the member commitment and group cohesion, and the higher the performance.
The information/decision-making perspective: diverse groups should outperform homogenous
groups. Diverse groups are more likely to possess a broader range of task-relevant knowledge, skills
and abilities that are distinct, which creates a larger pool of resources. Furthermore, they are more
likely to have different opinions and perspectives on the particular task, which leads to negotiating
and to more thoroughly processing task-relevant information and may prevent the group from
opting too easily for a consensus choice. In addition, the differences may lead to more creative and
innovative ideas and solutions. This leads to higher performance in the end.
Analyzing both sides, one could conclude that diversity negatively affects relationships within a team,
and positively affects the performance of a team. However relationship-conflicts lead to lower
performance, so not completely true.
Social categorization is more likely to occur for readily observable characteristics as sex and ethnicity,
than for more ‘hidden’ dimensions of diversity, such as functional or educational background. The
positive effects of diversity are linked to the latter. Therefore, you can also argue that diversity has only
positive effects on performance through informational differences, through underlying-job related
attributes. However, research show different results on this hypothesis.
Previous research failed to find the relation between diversity and group performance. To address this
problem, the article proposes the categorization-elaboration model (CEM). The CEM identifies a number
of reasons, why diversity research has yielded such inconsistent findings:
- Diversity research has paid insufficient attention to group information processing and to
important moderators of group information processing.
- Diversity research has often worked from a somewhat oversimplified conceptualization of social
categorization process (in-group versus out-group). This led to ignoring important moderators of
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper jannahollema. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €2,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 83662 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen