100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten
logo-home
Eerder door jou gezocht
Eerder door jou gezocht
logo
Volledige college aantekeningen Wetenschapsfilosofie - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam €6,49
In winkelwagen
Snel navigeren naar
Voorbeeld
  2.  
  3. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VU)
  4.  
  5. Wetenschapsfilosofie (S_WF)

College aantekeningen

Volledige college aantekeningen Wetenschapsfilosofie - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
 3 keer verkocht

Dit document bevat alle college aantekeningen van het vak Wetenschapsfilosofie aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Niet alleen de slide notes, maar ook overige aantekeningen.

Voorbeeld 4 van de 41  pagina's

Document informatie

  • 5 april 2023
  • 41
  • 2022/2023
  • College aantekeningen
  • Jeroen de ridder
  • Alle colleges

Onderwerpen

Geschreven voor

Alle documenten voor dit vak (17)

Verkoper

avatar-seller
mvandergreft

Ontvangen beoordelingen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Aantekeningen hoorcolleges – Wetenschapsfilosofie

College 1 – Introduction: What’s it all about?

Philosophy of science
• What distinguishes science from non-science?
• What’s special about scientific knowledge as opposed to other kinds of information or
knowledge?
à Questions within science philosophy

• Levels of philosophy of science:
1. The social world à the real world
- Investigating the social world in social science
- This course studies the social sciences (the nature of)

What’s special about science?
• A popular answer à the scientific method
• This makes science:
- Reliable/trustworthy
- Objective
- Independent
- Verifiable/replicable

Scientific method:
Observation/question à research topic area à hypothesis à test with experiment à analyze
data à report conclusions à (and then the circle starts over)

• It is science because when someone replicates the exact study, the results are the same

Reality check
• All is not well with science à fraud, questionable research practices, bias or sloppiness,
failing peer review, replication crisis, bad incentives for researchers

The replication crisis: Psychology
• 100 influential studies from three prestigious psychology journals
• Only 36% successfully replicated
• Effect sizes 50% of original
à So, lots of papers were not trustworthy

The replication crisis: Economics
• 6700 studies
• Half of them have 90% of results underpowered
• Of those with adequate power 80% of effect sizes exaggerated by factor 2, often more

The replication crisis: Social science
• 21 high-profile studies
• 13 of those replicate (62%)
• Effect size 50% of original

The case of ‘the lying Dutchman’
• Diederik Stapel
• Until 2011, highly successful career in social psychology at three different universities
• Built on outright fraud à data fabrication
à To check retraction (intrekking) of papers à retractionwatch.com




1

,Sloppy research science and questionable research practices
• Stopping data collection early (when significance is reached) or continuing until
significance is reached
• Hypothesizing after the results are known (Harking)
• Concealing results that contradict earlier findings
• Using creative/inappropriate analyses
• Not publishing negative (null) results
• Selective citing
• Demanding authorship without contributing
• Poor supervision

Explaining polarization
• Ezra Klein (co-founder of Vox.com)
• Polarization caused by our innate instincts for us vs. them thinking
• Which lead us to dislike outgroups, compete with them, and take pleasure in their losses
• Combined with social sorting and the formation of ‘mega-identities’
• These instincts are in turn explained by evolutionary theory
• Ingroup favoritism was good for survival in our evolutionary history
• Is social science ultimately a branch of biology?

Review of why we’re polarized
• Stephen Metcalf
• What about people’s beliefs, intentions, reasons, plans, interests, in the explanation of
polarization?
• Polarization was also very much a consciously devised political strategy, rather than
some foisted upon us blindly by our genes

Insider vs. outsider perspective in explaining human behavior
• Insider/s understanding à tries to understand the minds of other people, conduct
interviews etc. Forms an understanding based on that, emphasizes
• Outsider’s explanation à treats people like natural objects, products of blind forces of
nature. No need to look at the inside of people’s heads

What explains conspiracy belief?
• Outsider’s perspective à being skeptical, external factors like income
• Insider’s perspective à internal story people give for why things happen, distrust of
official sources, conscious reasoning

Course theme 1: Naturalism
• Are the social sciences different from the natural sciences?
• Studying people and society vs. studying physical particles, objects, systems
• Insider vs. outsider perspective
• Understanding vs. explaining
• Are there laws of nature, causality, mechanisms in the social sciences?

Course theme 2: Reductionism
• Is social science reducible to psychology, and neuroscience, or even further to the natural
sciences?
• Or are they irreducible and are social-level descriptions, theories, and explanations
ineliminable?
• Methodological individualism
- Is talk about ‘families’, ‘organizations’, ‘institutions’, ‘nations’, etc., shorthand for
talk about individuals and their actions?
- Should a good explanation be couched in terms of individuals?




2

,Social science and values
• Can science be value driven? Or value free?
• Race theory, gender theory, feminism, etc.

Course theme 3: Normativity
Normativity of social science:
• Should (and can) social science be value-free?
• What does that mean and what does it have to do with objectivity, neutrality, and
trustworthiness?

Normativity in social science:
• What role do values, norms, and rules play in explaining human behavior?
• And what are they?




3

, College 2 – objectivity and values

Standard image of science
Common sense view of science
• Based on empirical observation, not speculation or preconceived ideas
• Describing the world as it is in itself
• Outsider’s (third-person) perspective
• Neutral, value-free
• Formulated in exact theories, if possible using math/statistics

Logical positivism
• Vienna circle à group of scientists (in early 20th century Vienna) reflecting on
philosophical questions about science
- Moritz Schlick
- Otto Neurath
- Rudolf Carnap
• Aim à development of a strictly scientific worldview
• Against speculative philosophy, religious ideas, traditional worldviews

Side note
• Why the word ‘positivism’ à given, what’s positive, you want to restrict yourself to that
what is given
• From ‘positive’, in the sense of ‘what is posed’, what is given, what is laid down
• NOT in the sense of ‘happy’, ‘in a good mood’ etc.

Ideals
• Strict empiricism à knowledge can only come from observation
- No place for speculative claims that are not based on observation
• Use of formal logic and mathematics to create an ideal and precise language for science
- To guard against unwarranted terminology and against leaps to conclusions and
unsupported theories

Core ideas (1)
• Analytic vs. synthetic statements
1. Analytic à true just on the basis of the meaning of the words used
- ‘All bachelors are unmarried’
- 5 + 7 = 12
2. Synthetic à true/false on the basis of the meaning of the words used and what the world
is like
- ‘There are at least 100 students in this room’ à you have to go out and look in the
world
- ‘Marc is a bachelor’ à you don’t know this based on the name ‘Marc’, you have to
ask him, do research
- ‘All polar bears are white’ à you should check if they are all white

• The empirical sciences are concerned with synthetic statements
• Empirical scientific research is the only way of determining the truth or falsity of these
statements
• Definitions, logic, and mathematics are all analytic statements




4

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Direct to-the-point

Direct to-the-point

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper mvandergreft. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 65004 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Begin nu gratis

Laatst bekeken door jou

Tentamen (uitwerkingen) ·

(0)

BEST REVIEW Chamberlain College of Nursing Bio 251 Anatomy BIOS 251 Week 4 Quiz 4 (100% Verified COMPLETE Answers)

Tentamen (uitwerkingen) ·

(0)

Sophia Conflict Resolution Milestones, 5 Combined Revision Study Guides, Correctly Answered Questions, Test bank Questions and Answers with Explanations (latest Update), 100% Correct, Download to Scor

Tentamen (uitwerkingen) ·

(0)

CANADIAN ATPL SARON EXAM LATEST 2023 - 2024 ACTUAL EXAM 500+ QUESTIONS AND CORRECT DETAILED ANSWERS |ALREADY GRADED A+

Tentamen (uitwerkingen) ·

(0)

NR 443 Chapter 12: Mood Disorders: Depression, Bipolar, and Adjustment Disorders

Tentamen (uitwerkingen) ·

(0)

NUR206 UNIT peds Exam 2 Question And Answers All Verified

Case uitwerking ·

(0)

ABS300 Week 2 Assignment 2, Clinical History report Draft

Tentamen (uitwerkingen) ·

(0)

HESI RN MENTAL HEALTH 2021 VERSION 1| VERSION2 AND VERSION 3 38 PAGES OF QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS FROM TEST with COMPLETE LATEST SOLUTIONS

Tentamen (uitwerkingen) ·

(0)

Airway/Breathing (Oxygenation) Pneumonia/Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Clinical Reasoning Case Study

Samenvatting ·

(0)

Effectief samenwerken
€6,49  3x  verkocht
  • (0)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd