100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Summary Unit 3 AC3.2 criminology WJEC model answer €4,29   In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Summary Unit 3 AC3.2 criminology WJEC model answer

1 beoordeling
 50 keer bekeken  4 keer verkocht
  • Vak
  • Instelling

Model answer that was created and used by two A* students who both received 100% in the final Unit 3 exam. Detailed description of all the different types of conclusions draw from evidence/information. *please note don’t copy exactly as it would be considered plagiarism).

Voorbeeld 2 van de 7  pagina's

  • 9 april 2023
  • 7
  • 2022/2023
  • Samenvatting

1  beoordeling

review-writer-avatar

Door: jessiegriffiths • 8 maanden geleden

avatar-seller
AC3.2 Draw conclusions from information (15
marks)

Specification Requirements

Content Amplification

Conclusions Learners should develop skills to analyse
information, in order to draw conclusions based on
● Just verdicts reasoned evidence.
● Miscarriage
In their controlled assessment response,
● Safe verdict learners should make reference to the
assignment brief and other examples they have
● Just sentencing studied.




1

, Just Verdicts
What is a just verdict?
Jurors are told to reach a verdict that is both fair and just, but some verdicts have lacked justice and
fairness in the eyes of the law therefore they are considered “unjust”. In order for a verdict to be just it
must be impartial and consider all the information and evidence given as well as any circumstances
that surround the case, this will make it fair. The jury includes laypersons, who can be susceptible to
external factors such as the media and biases. In some cases it can take years for a just verdict to be
reached.




Case study of a just verdict: Stephen Lawrence
Stephen Lawrence was murdered in April 1993. It was an unprovoked attack, he was stabbed to death
by a young white gang while waiting at the bus stop. After the murder several residents provided the
names of the suspects and a note was left on a telephone box with the name of the 5 suspects. Luke
Knight, David Norris, Jamie and Neil Acourt and Gary Dobson. However no arrests were made.
Lawrence’s family complained that the police were not doing enough. Police arrested the 5 suspects
but the charges were dropped due to insufficient evidence. Some people believed that the
investigation was corrupt due to the relationship between detectives and the gang members.
After new forensic evidence was found Dobson and Norris faced trail of the murder of Stephen. On
January 3rd 2012 they were found guilty. This verdict is unjust because despite the 5 men being
identified by Duwanye Brooks and being charged with the murder only two of them are serving life
sentences while the other suspects of the murder have never faced justice. After perseverance and
campaigns by Lawrence’s family Gary and David were found guilty. This was 19 years after the
lengthy investigation, this investigation involved professional incompetence, institutional racism and a
lack of leadership. To begin with it took the police two weeks to make any arrests despite numerous
residents making identifications. This meant the murderers had time to destroy key evidence like the
clothes they were wearing. The original investigation didn’t convict those responsible and the
campaign for justice led by Lawrence’s family led to a public enquiry. The large amount of time it took
to reach justice, and the fact that not all those involved in the murder were convicted means the verdict
is unjust.




Miscarriage of Justice
What is a miscarriage of justice?
2

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper erinhurst. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €4,29. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 80189 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€4,29  4x  verkocht
  • (1)
  Kopen