Document gets 83% with evidence from the article for each point of the R.R.I revised criteria plus a simplified table with all the answers. This is a supporting document, not a memo. Link to download article included. ARTICLE USED: Harry, N. (2021) Call centre Agents' emotional intelligence.....
Door: maselwaboikanyomarcus • 1 jaar geleden
Door: natachamartins • 1 jaar geleden
Door: lahershaakira • 1 jaar geleden
Door: matezathandeka • 1 jaar geleden
Bekijk meer beoordelingen
Verkoper
Volgen
PerfectionistNotes
Ontvangen beoordelingen
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
HMPYC80
ASSIGNMENT 3 2023
(R.R.I REVISED)
ARTICLE ANALYSIS
Perfectionist Notes
PRIVATE TUTOR FOR HONOURS IN PSYCHOLOGY - UNISA
helping you achieve your best results
This is not a memo - it will get you 83%
, Property of Perfectionist Notes
Plagiarism/distribution/illegal use/selling of this document will be prosecuted
To access article use this URL:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cLHnyPVUnWG2Cx3SVOS
0SyJGiCYAsIhY/view?usp=share_link
1
, Property of Perfectionist Notes
Plagiarism/distribution/illegal use/selling of these notes will be prosecuted
AT THE END OF THIS DOCUMENT IS A TABLE WITH ALL THE
ANSWERS
HOW TO USE THE RESEARCH REVIEW INVENTORY (revised)
The review inventory consists of a number of items, numbered sequentially from 1 up to 58.
For research proposals: 1-45.
You can download the UNISA version on MyUnisa. Document title: “Review Log for the
Research Review Inventory MS WORD FILE Unisa HMPYC80”.
RATING SCALE :
Items should be reviewed and rated on a three-point rating scale from 1 to 3.
The ratings are defined as follows:
1: Absent, incorrect, or completely wrong.
2: Only partially addressed. It does not attain the item requirement or criteria.
3: Sufficiently up to standard in terms of the item criteria.
Every relevant item should be reviewed and rated on this three-point scale (1 to 3).
KEEP A RECORD OF YOUR ANSWERS
Use the R.R.I. (revised): Review Log to document and keep a record of your ratings ON THE
ONLINE SITE
REVIEWER COMMENTS AND THE FEEDBACK REPORT
Each rating is associated with general comments.
For example, suppose a reviewer reviews a particular proposal and gives a rating of “3” for the
clarification of the proposed study. The general comment would be: “The research question is
formulated. A research question is derived from the research issue.”
IMPORTANT NOTES
Remember, where the item criterion is not explicitly addressed then allocate a low rating (1).
Good academic writing is clear and transparent. If a reader needs to guess at whether an issue
has been implemented and addressed or not, then the writing is neither clear nor transparent.
Only give a high rating (3) if the item criteria have been explicitly addressed.
2
, Property of Perfectionist Notes
Plagiarism/distribution/illegal use/selling of these notes will be prosecuted
ANALYSIS OF ASSIGNMENT 3 ARTICLE:
A. THE TITLE
Title of the article:
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
01. The title contains at least one central psychological construct from the research proposal or
study.
What is a psychological construct?
Intelligence, motivation, anxiety, and fear are all examples of constructs. In psychology, a
construct is a skill, attribute, or ability that is based on one or more established theories.
ANSWER
TITLE =Call centre agents’ emotional intelligence as predicators of their exhaustion and
professional efficacy: Read online: The moderating effect of meaningfulness (Harry, 2021,
pp.1).
Psychological construct = emotional intelligence
Therefore it meets the criteria.
=3
SUPPORTING EVIDENCE: Emotional Intelligence emerged as a major psychological
construct in the early 1990s, where it was conceptualized as a set of abilities largely
analogous to general intelligence (google)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
02. The title indicates the research setting or demographic information of the sample
population.
Any one of the following is sufficient: where, who, when, under what circumstances, or the
phenomenon that is being investigated.
ANSWER:
This title indicates:
who = Call centre agents’
phenomenon = emotional intelligence as predicators of their exhaustion and professional
efficacy
(Harry, 2021, pp.1).
Therefore it meets the criteria.
=3
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
03. The title points to, or refers to, the research method, design or paradigm.
This may be signalled by a keyword or phrase such as: “lived experiences”, “perceptions”,
“attitudes”, “constructions”, “discourses”, “quasi-experimental”, “critical study”, “psychometric
properties”, “correlational study”, “inferential study”, and so on.
3
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper PerfectionistNotes. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,24. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.