100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
IOS2601 EXAM PACK 2023 €2,69   In winkelwagen

Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

IOS2601 EXAM PACK 2023

 7 keer bekeken  1 keer verkocht
  • Vak
  • Instelling

IOS2601 EXAM PACK 2023

Voorbeeld 4 van de 72  pagina's

  • 15 mei 2023
  • 72
  • 2022/2023
  • Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
  • Vragen en antwoorden
avatar-seller
IOS2601
EXAM
PACK 2023

,Question 1.4 = 1


Question 1.5 = 1


Question 1.6 = 2


Question 1.7 = 1


Question 1.8 = 2


Question 1.9 = 3


Question 1.10 = 1




2|Page

,An ordinary citizen may rely on the everyday meaning of legislation; therefor the courts

may not proceed beyond the plain meaning of the text. A dictionary must firstly be used

to settle interpretive questions.

The ‘golden rule’ of interpretation is that if the ‘plain meaning’ of words are ambiguous

(there exists more than one meaning of the word, in question, in the dictionary), vague

or misleading or if the strict literal interpretation would result in absurdity (Venter v R),

then the court may deviate to avoid such absurdity. The court will then turn to

‘secondary aids’ to interpret the intention of the legislator. ‘Secondary aids’ are the long

title of the statute, headings of chapters and sections, and the text in the other official

language etc. If the ‘secondary aids’ also do not lead to a satisfactory result, then the

court may refer to tertiary aids to interpretation. These tertiary aids are common law

presumptions that may be used. In these cases, the court will concedes that it cannot

determine what is intended by the legislature and that it will its own assumption about

what the legislature has intended.

The textual approach after 27 April 1994 (Interim Constitution came into effect)

The Appellate Division referred to with approval to the textual approach for statutory

interpretation in Swanepoel v Johannesburg City Council: “[T]he rules of statutory

[exegesis] are intended as aids in resolving any doubts as to the legislature’s true

intention. Where this intention is proclaimed in clear terms either expressly or by

necessary implication the assistance of these rules need not be sought.”

The Supreme Court of Appeal the traditional rule of interpretation in Commissioner,

SARS v executor, Frith’s Estate: “The primary rule in construction of a statutory



3|Page

, The purposive (text-in-context) approach

Even before 1994, the purposive approach was applied by the courts from time to time.

th
This approach dates back to 16 century English law and has resulted in a number of

important minority judgments.

The purpose of the legislation is the most important factor in terms of the text-in-context

approach. The law-text in context of surrounding circumstances, as well as social and

political considerations, is taken into account. The most important rule of the contextual

approach is the so-called mischief rule.




In Construction of Statutes, Elmer Driedger defines the mischief rule as follows: “A

statute is to be so construed as to suppress the mischief and advance the remedy, thus

giving the courts considerable latitude in achieving the objective of the legislature

despite any inadequacy in the language employed by it.”

External aids to interpretation must be applied from the beginning of the process of

interpretation. These aids and circumstances are indicative of the context wherein the

legislation was enacted by indicating what the main mischief was that the legislation

intended to address. The context can be researched by considering the legal position

before the legislation, the legal problem that existed, the new solutions brought about by

the statute and the reasons for the new legislation.

The contextual approach differs from the literal approach in the following respects:

 The wider context may be considered form the start.



4|Page

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper pablitoh11. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €2,69. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 76669 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€2,69  1x  verkocht
  • (0)
  Kopen