Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

CRW2602 _Criminal_Law_Test_Bank.

0 keer verkocht

Vak
CRW 2602

Instelling
University Of South Africa

CRW2602 _Criminal_Law_Test_Bank. Question 1 (a) This statement is correct. See SG 1.2.2 (vi). (b) This statement is incorrect. See SG 1.2.7. Dolus eventualis is a sufficient form of intention. (c) This statement is correct. See SG 1.2.6. You should, therefore, have chosen option (4...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 4 van de 70 pagina's

Bekijk voorbeeld

Geupload op 17 mei 2023
Aantal pagina's 70
Geschreven in 2020/2021
Type Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat Vragen en antwoorden

crw2602 criminal law test bank
crw2602 criminal law test bank
crw2602 criminallawtestbank

Instelling
University of South Africa
Vak
CRW 2602

Volgen

D0ctorMackenzie

Lid sinds 2 jaar 47 documenten verkocht

€4,42

In winkelwagen

Op verlanglijstje

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

CRW2602
CRIMINAL LAW
TEST BANK

, 1

PART A (MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS)

Question 1

(a) This statement is correct. See SG 1.2.2 (vi).
(b) This statement is incorrect. See SG 1.2.7. Dolus eventualis is a sufficient
form of intention.
(c) This statement is correct. See SG 1.2.6.

You should, therefore, have chosen option (4) since only statements (a) and (c) are
correct.

Question 2

(a) This statement is correct. See SG 1.3.4.
(b) This statement is correct. See SG 1.3.4.
(c) This statement is correct. See SG 1.3.4.

You should, therefore, have chosen option (5) since all the statements are correct.

Question 3

(a) This statement is incorrect. See SG 10.1.7. The Appellate division in Heyne
1956 (3) SA 604 (A) has held that attempted fraud is in fact possible where a
misrepresentation has been made by X, but which has not yet come to Y’s
attention as in the case where a letter containing a misrepresentation has been
lost in the post.
(b) This statement is incorrect. See SG 10.1.3 (3). The misrepresentation in the
crime of fraud can also be committed by an omission where there is a legal duty
on X to disclose a fact.
(c) This statement is correct. See SG 2.4.6.

, 2

You should, therefore, have chosen option (4) since only statement (c) is correct.

Question 4

(a) This statement is correct. See SG 7.4.6.
(b) This statement is incorrect. See SG 7.4.8. For the crime of abduction to be
completed, it is not required that the marriage or sexual intercourse should have
taken place, as all that is required is the intention on the part of X to commit either
one of these acts..
(c) This statement is incorrect. See SG 5.2.1 and the Mshumpa-case in
Casebook 264. The legal definition speaks to the unlawful and intentional causing
of the death of another human being and a foetus is excluded from this definition.

You should, therefore, have chosen option (1) since only statement (a) is correct.

Question 5

(a) This statement is incorrect. See SG 5.2.1 and SG 6.2.7. X would be
convicted of the crime of culpable homicide if he is negligent as the crime of
murder requires the element of intention.
(b) This statement is incorrect. See SG 3.6.2.4. The speed limit on a public road
outside an urban area is 100km/h.
(c) This statement is correct. See SG 3.6.6.

You should, therefore, have chosen option (3) since only statement (c) is correct.

Question 6

(a) This statement is correct. See SG 3.6.3.
(b) This statement is incorrect. See SG 3.6.2.5 and SG 3.6.3.3 (Activity and
feedback). A police officer who responds to an emergency and causes a motor
vehicle collision while crossing a red traffic light, can be convicted of negligent
driving if he does not drive with ‘due regard’ for the safety of other road users.
See also S v Groep 2002 (1) SACR 538 (E).

, 3

(c) This statement is incorrect. See SG 3.6.4.3 and 3.6.4.5. This crime can be
committed negligently but other road-users had to be present on the road at the
time in order for this offence to have been committed.

You should, therefore, have chosen option (1) since only statement (a) is correct.

Question 7

(a) This statement is incorrect. See SG 8.6.1.2; 8.6.1.3 and Casebook 251-252.
The mere assumption of control over property which belongs to someone else is
insufficient for completed theft, but it is sufficient to amount to the crime of
attempted theft.
(b) This statement is incorrect. See SG 5.2.1. X complies with the definition of
murder which is the unlawful and intentional causing of the death of another
person.
(c) This statement is incorrect. See SG 12.4 and Summary (5). The structure
may be any movable or immovable property that is or might ordinarily be used for
human habitation, or any immovable structure which is, or might be used for
storage or housing of property.

You should, therefore, have chosen option (5) since none of these statements is
correct.

Question 8

(a) This statement is incorrect. See SG 7.2.4. Crimen iniuria involves only two
parties whereas the crime of defamation involves three parties.
(b) This statement is correct. See SG 7.2.7.3.(5)
(c) This statement is incorrect. See SG 6.1.9. The crime of assault is an
intentional crime and can take the form of direct intention, indirect intention or
dolus eventualis.

You should, therefore, have chosen option (2) since only statement (b) is correct.

Question 9

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Direct to-the-point

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper D0ctorMackenzie. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €4,42. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 69052 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Begin nu gratis

Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

CRW2602 _Criminal_Law_Test_Bank.

Document informatie

Onderwerpen

Geschreven voor

Verkoper

Ontvangen beoordelingen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud