Samenvatting
Research Workshop: Survey - summary
I provided the summary for chapters included in each lectures. Hope this helps!
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 4 van de 33 pagina's
Voorbeeld 4 van de 33 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Verkoper
VolgenVoorbeeld van de inhoud
, LECTURE IIntroduction:What is survey research about?
2 Produce statistics/draw inferences abouta target audience.
C ↳ Disadvantages
Advantages
->
Relatively low cost ->
Generally limited to scaled or check-list questions
->
Relatively fastdelivery -> No control over response rate
->
Rapid data processing -> Provide information more than
understanding
-> can search large population
->
Increasing public resistance
-> various mode:phone, mail, Internet, f2f... -
Difficult to exploreissues in depth.
C Two inferences
How
->
closely the sample responding mirrors the population -> external validity
-> How well answers measure characteristics internal validity
Errors in surveys
① Common sources of errors
C A worded question
poorly
↳ Deviations from the script by the interviewer
C
Misunderstanding on the part of the interviewee
Cy
Memory problem on the part of the interviewer
C. The way the information is recorded by the interviewer
② Types of errors
↳ Random
Sample: sampling errors
->
-
a Questions:invalidity
↳ Biased
Samplebias:not equal chance for everyone in the population
-
Question bias
->
Designing questions
① General rules ② Common mistakes
↳ Remember C.
your RQ Ambiguous terms
C. Decide Co
exactly what you want to find out Long questions
↳ Consider Cn Double-barreled
your audience questions
↳ C.
Imagine yourself respondent
as a Very general questions
Would you answer the question? C
Leading questions
->
How would you answer the question? Cn Double
negative
->
Identify any vague misleading questions
->
or
1
, ③ What to consider?
↳ Is
your systolic pressure normal atthis moment?
↳ Do respondents have the knowledge to answer the questions?
↳ Do you want just a yes/no answer, have you given more possibilities?
↳ Have you thought whether you should include "don't know option?
↳ Are
relying too
you much on the respondents' memory?
or "I
④ Midpoint don'tknow"
↳
If you include don't know option/middle category, people will use it.
->
If you need people to choose one or the other:do not include "don't know"
->
If itis possible that people lack knowledge required to answer a
particular question:
including don't know can be sensible.
-> some will spend less time thinking about difficult question.
↳ Beware
-
Leaving "don'tknow"/middle
out option may cause irritation.
sometimes middle
->
ground/don't know is a
possibility.
⑤
Answer options and measurement level
(DN-0-1-R
↳y based on what researcher desires
⑥ Being specific
↳ How detailed should the answer be?
↳ Sometimes, is more burdensome.
more precise
⑦ Social desirability
↳ You answer as what society expect you to answer
↳ Make undesirable answer less threatening
Everybody makes mistake
->
->
Anonymous data
->
Desirability varies between groups and culture
⑧ Balanced question
↳ Balanced
pros and cons in a question
↳ Is it A, or is it B?
⑨ Primacy and intimacy
↓ ↓
first ans last ans
cannot leave out individual bias
category category -
↳ Rotate answer -- ↓ bias at the
aggregate level
, ⑩ Open a close question
C
Open-ended question
-> Noless bias due to
options
validity
C increase
->
can be
exhausting for a respondent
->
Explorative questions
↳
Unanticipated responses
Very important to clarify the question
->
->
Transformations after datacollection / lots of differentresponse.
-> sometimes answer categories are
preferred
->
Advantages
In
Respondents answer in their own term
Cn Allow for
new,unexpected responses
C
Exploratory generate fixedanswer categories
-
Disadvantages
->
Cn
Time-consuming
C
Difficultto code
2 Interviewer variation in
recording answers
Pretest
G
Pretesting an interview
Evaluate question
->
↳ It is worded
easy to read as
In
Respondents can understand in a consistent way
->
Behaviors
*
Whether or not the interviewers read the questions as worded
↳ Whether not the
or respondents ask for clarification
C. Whether or not the respondents initially give an adequate answer thatrequires
interviewer
probing
Results are systematic and replicable
->
Cnpretesting a self-administered questionnaires -> in person, w/a group of potential respondents
↳
Debugging a computer-assisted instrument
-> The ease of use
The contigency instructions
->
are working as
advantages
intended - computer's
Cp
Survey instruments length
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper trnphnglinh. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €5,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 58993 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen