Module 1 - chapter 1
The empirical cycle
Observation → theory → prediction → Testing → conclusion → evaluation
Falsifiability, parsimony, evidence → Good theory
Research
Basic -- Translational → Applied
Publishing
- For peer review
- The editor’s decision
Module 2 - chapter 2&3
Chapter 2
3 sources of evidence for personal beliefs: experience, intuition,
authority, in comparison with empirical research.
Experience
- In order to draw conclusions, we need all the data - comparison between experimental
condition and control condition; confounding variables need to be controlled, so that
only the chosen independent variable changes
- While personal experience might seem to disprove research, research is
probabilistic - even if personal experience does not align with what is most likely
according to the data, that is because research explains a certain proportion of
the phenomena
- Experience provides one side of the data, leading to biased conclusions
- Experience is liable because it is impossible to control and isolate variables
- Bushman et al 2001 - catharsis is bullshit in alleviating anger
- Practicing aggression only causes more aggression
Intuition
- Human thinking is biased, without the knowledge of the extent of the bias
- Freud supported catharsis because he inspired himself after industrial machines - the
metaphor of “letting off steam” to feel less pressure
- Availability Heuristic - things that pop up easily in our minds guide our thinking
- Overestimation of the likelihood of an event
- We don’t seek out information that we don’t see → present bias
- We only look at evidence that aligns with our previous beliefs; “cherry picking” and
asking for things that confirm what we know→ confirmation bias
, - Bias blind spot = knowing about a possible bias in our judgement and thinking
ourselves unlikely to be biased ourselves
- Empiricism, on the other hand, strives for objectivity to null biases
Authorities
- If the information they provide isn’t empirical, it should not be trusted
- Always check the source of their information and the reliability of the source
- Sources:
- Empirical journal articles
- Review journal articles (meta-analyses) - give the effect size of a relationship
- Chapters in edited books
- Books
- Categorize everything as either argument or evidence
Chapter 3
Claims make statements about variables and the relationship between variables.
Variable varies on different levels (values). A constant is something that could vary but the
researchers chose to keep at one level.
Measured vs. manipulated variables
- measured means the levels of the variable are observed and measured;
- Some variables can only be measured (age, sex, IQ)
- manipulated variable is controlled by the researcher, who changes the levels of it.
- In some cases, it is unethical to manipulate a specific variable (education, drug
use etc).
- Some variables can be both measured and manipulated, depending on the case.
Conceptual variable (construct) - has a conceptual definition; when testing, researchers
create operational definitions → operational variables (the concept becomes measured
or manipulated).
Claim = an argument
- Frequency claims - 1 in 4 people poops
- A rate or degree of a single variable
- In studies with frequency claims, the variables are measured, not manipulated
- Association claims - people who poop are more relaxed
- Variables correlate/covary - are related
- Correlational studies -
- Positive correlation, negative (inverse), and zero associations/correlations
- These can help us make predictions/estimations, except for zero correlation
, - Causal claim - pooping leads to higher rates of relaxation
- One variable is responsible for changing the other
- A positive/negative correlation, where the language suggests that one variable
affects the other (zero correlation - zero causation
- 3 requirements:
1. Establish correlation (≠ 0)
2. The cause variable comes before the outcome variable
3. Must establish that there isnt another explanation
- Tentative language - still causal
Validity = the appropriateness of a conclusion
- construct validity
- In frequency claims, how well a conceptual variable is operationalized, how well
the researchers measured their variables
- In association claims, each variable is evaluated to assess the validity of the claim
- In causal claims - how well were the variables operationalized
- Measuring reliably means that the measure yields similar scores on repeated tests,
different levels correspond to true differences in the variable
- external validity - how generalizable a claim is based on the sample population used in
the study; would the same results be obtained on another population?
- Statistical validity = the accuracy/reason of a conclusion, to what extent do the data
explain the claim?
- In frequency claims - margin of error of the estimate hels describe how well
the sample estimates the true percentage
- In association claims - how strong is the association?
- Type I error - a false positive - there is a correlation when in reality
there isn't
- Type II error - a miss - when the found association is zero but it actually
exists
- Causal claims - asking whether the difference in the DV was statistically
significant → covariance
Causal Claims
Causation has 3 criteria:
1. Covariance = the two variables go together - that’s up to the result of the experiment
2. Temporal precedence = one variable comes first in time, before the other one; the
effect measured on the DV comes after modifying the IV
3. Internal validity = the study’s ability to eliminate alternative explanations for the
association between variables; only experiments can rule out alternative explanations
➢ Causal claims come as results of experiments (the manipulation of one variable (IV) to
measure its effect on another(DV))
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper flaviastoia. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
