100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
AQA A level Psychology - Paper 3 topics €9,58   In winkelwagen

Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

AQA A level Psychology - Paper 3 topics

 13 keer bekeken  0 keer verkocht
  • Vak
  • Instelling

AQA A level Psychology - Paper 3 Topics Gender bias Ans- Psychologists seek universality but bias may be inevitable (social historical contexts) Gender bias: psychological theory/research not accurately represent experience/behaviour of men + women Alpha bias: differences exaggerated, devalue ...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 4 van de 55  pagina's

  • 19 juni 2023
  • 55
  • 2022/2023
  • Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
  • Vragen en antwoorden
avatar-seller
AQA A level Psychology - Paper 3 Topics
Gender bias Ans- Psychologists seek universality but bias may be inevitable (social historical contexts)



Gender bias: psychological theory/research not accurately represent experience/behaviour of men +
women



Alpha bias: differences exaggerated, devalue women

E.g. Freud = genuine psychological differences due to physiological differences

Girls suffer from 'penis envy', femininity is failed masculinity



Beta bias: differences minimised, needs of women ignored

E.g. fight or flight research = male only sample, assumed would be applicable, Taylor et al: tend and
befriend (governed by oxytocin)



Androcentrism: male behaviour seen as normal, deviations seen as abnormal/inferior

Female behaviour misunderstood/pathologised

E.g. feminists object to PMS, medicalises female emotions by explaining in hormonal terms (Male anger
often seen as rational response to external pressures)



Gender bias (- in psych research) Ans- May create misleading assumptions about female
behaviour/validate discriminatory practices

Scientific justification to deny opportunities (e.g. due to PMS)

Damaging consequences on lives/prospects



Gender bias (- promotes sexism in research process) Ans- Lack of women at senior research level =
female concerns not reflected in research questions asked

Men more likely to be published

Female ppts in inequitable relationship with researcher (power to label irrational/unable to complete
tasks)

Constitutional sexism - creates bias in theory/research

,Gender bias (+ feminist psychologists suggest how to avoid) Ans- Worrell & Remer:

Studied within meaningful real life contexts

Participate instead of objects of study

Study diversity within groups of women rather than comparisons to men

Collaborative research methods (qualitative data)

Preferable/less biased



Cultural bias Ans- Psych claims to unearth universal truths but may only apply to particular groups
studied



Wrongly assumed western findings would apply all over the world

E.g. conformity (Asch) and obedience (Milgram) produced different results outside of US

Standard/norm for behaviour judged from one culture = cultural differences seen as abnormal



Ethnocentrism: belief in superiority of own culture

Behaviour that doesn't conform to Western model = deficient

E.g. Ainsworth's strange situation (American norms/values, separation anxiety defining, secure = ideal,
German mothers labelled cold/rejecting, inappropriate measure for non-US children)



Cultural relativism may help reduce bias

Facts/things only make sense from perspective of culture within which discovered



Berry:

Etic approach: looking at behaviours outside of culture and identifying universal

Emic approach: looking at behaviour within culture and identifying culturally specific

Imposed etic: e.g. Ainsworth studies within single culture and assumed could be applied universally



Cultural bias (- distinction between individuaism/collectivism) Ans- Value of individual/independence vs
value ofgroup/interdependence

,Lazy/simplistic distinction, no longer applies

Takano & Osaka: 14/15 studies comparing US and Japan found no evidence of distinction between
culture types

Form of cultural bias less of issue than once was



Cultural bias (recognition of both relativism/universals) Ans- Imposed etic shows culturally specific
nature of psychology

Should not assume all psychology is culturally relative/no such thing as universal behaviour

Ekman: basic facial expressions for emotions same all over human/animal world

Attachment behaviours universal (imitation/interactional synchrony)

Full understanding requires study of both universals/variations among individuals/groups



Cultural bias (cross-cultural research prone to demand characteristics) Ans- Western cultures: familiarity
with aims/objectives of scientific enquiry assumed

Cultures without historical experience of research, local populations more affected by demand
characteristics

Unfamiliarity with research tradition threatens validity of outcomes



Free will/determinism Ans- Free will: we are self-determining

Free to choose thoughts/actions

Biological/environmental influences on behaviour but can reject

No cause/unpredictable

Humanistic approach



Determinism: behaviour shaped/controlled by internal/external forces

Hard = completely out of control, all has cause possible to identify, predictable, compatible with aims of
science

Soft = all has cause, conscious mental control over behaviour, behaviour predictable to extent, some
free will to make choices



Biological determinism

, Biological approach, control from internal biological factors (physiological/genetic/hormonal)

Physiological processes not under conscious control (e.g. influence of ANS on stress/anxiety)

Genetic factors may determine behaviours/characteristics (e.g. mental disorders)

Hormones may determine behaviour (e.g. testosterone linked to aggression)



Environmental determinism

Popularised by behaviourist approach

Skinner: all result of conditioning

Choice = total sum of reinforcement contingencies acted upon during lives

Illusion of free will, shaped by environmental events/agents of socialisation (e.g. parents, teachers,
institutions)



Psychic determinism

Flreud: free will = illusion, emphasis on biological drives/instincts underpinning responses

Determined/directed by unconscious conflicts repressed in childhood

E.g. 'slip of the tongue' determined by unconscious



Science seeks causal explanations

Basic principle: every event has cause, can be explained with general laws

Allows predict/control

One thing determined by another

Lab experiment: remove extraneous variables to demonstrate causal effect



Free will/determinism (+ determinism consistent with aims of science) Ans- Human behaviour =
orderly/obeys laws

Greater scientific credibility

Predict/control behaviour led to development of treatments/therapies (e.g. psychoactive drugs for
schizophrenia)

Schizophrenia = some behaviour determined (loss of control over thoughts/behaviour, no one chooses)

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper CertifiedGrades. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €9,58. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 80796 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€9,58
  • (0)
  Kopen