Fraud Triangle and its Risk Factors that pertain to accounting-related fraud
The fraud triangle model is a well-known framework for figuring out the factors that lead to fraudulent
behavior in organizations. It is made up of three interconnected parts: opportunity, drive (or stress), and
justification The fraud triangle is a useful tool for understanding the dynamics of fraud, but it also has
some drawbacks and risks that should be taken into consideration. The following are some of the risk
factors that pertain to accounting-related fraud and are associated with the fraud triangle model:
1. Opportunity:
The conditions or circumstances that enable individuals to commit fraud without detection are referred
to as opportunities. Some of the risk factors that are associated with opportunity in the context of
accounting-related fraud include:
- Frail inner controls: It can be possible for people to manipulate financial records and commit fraud if
duties aren't properly divided, there isn't enough oversight, and monitoring isn't effective.
- A lack of openness: Financial frauds like misrepresenting financial statements or concealing
transactions may be facilitated by processes that lack transparency in financial reporting and disclosure.
2. Instability (pressure):
The personal or financial factors that motivate individuals to commit fraud are represented by
motivation or pressure. The following risk factors may contribute to motivation in accounting-related
fraud:
- Financial challenges: Employees may feel compelled to commit fraud in order to alleviate their financial
pressures due to personal debt, financial difficulties, or the need to maintain a particular lifestyle.
- Rewards that are tied to performance: People are more likely to engage in dishonest activities in an
effort to achieve goals or increase their own rewards when they are under pressure to do so because of
high performance targets, unreasonable expectations, or excessive compensation based on financial
metrics.
3. Rationalization:
The cognitive process that people use to justify their dishonesty is referred to as rationalization. Some of
the risk factors associated with rationalization in the context of accounting-related fraud include:
- Erosion of ethics: People may be influenced to justify fraudulent actions as acceptable by a corporate
culture that tolerates unethical practices or disregards integrity.
- A sense of entitlement: As a means of compensating for what they perceive to be a lack of fair
treatment, employees who believe they are not adequately compensated or recognized for the
contributions they have made may justify the act of fraud.
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper labeebkhalid. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €8,29. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.