100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
2023 AQA A LEVEL PSYCHOLOGY PAPER 3 MARK SCHEME- Issues & Options €6,63   In winkelwagen

Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

2023 AQA A LEVEL PSYCHOLOGY PAPER 3 MARK SCHEME- Issues & Options

 601 keer bekeken  1 keer verkocht
  • Vak
  • AQA
  • Instelling
  • AQA

2023 AQA A LEVEL PSYCHOLOGY PAPER 3 MARK SCHEME- Issues & Options Key features 1. focus on acceptance of responsibility/positive change 2. non-courtroom setting, voluntary 3. active rather than passive 4. focus on positive outcomes for both

Voorbeeld 4 van de 63  pagina's

  • 22 juni 2023
  • 63
  • 2022/2023
  • Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
  • Vragen en antwoorden
  • AQA
  • AQA
avatar-seller
2023 AQA A LEVEL PSYCHOLOGY PAPER 3 MARK
SCHEME- Issues & Options


Gender bias

Psychologists seek universality but bias may be inevitable (social historical contexts)



Gender bias: psychological theory/research not accurately represent experience/behaviour of men +
women



Alpha bias: differences exaggerated, devalue women

E.g. Freud = genuine psychological differences due to physiological differences

Girls suffer from 'penis envy', femininity is failed masculinity



Beta bias: differences minimised, needs of women ignored

E.g. fight or flight research = male only sample, assumed would be applicable, Taylor et al: tend and
befriend (governed by oxytocin)



Androcentrism: male behaviour seen as normal, deviations seen as abnormal/inferior

Female behaviour misunderstood/pathologised

E.g. feminists object to PMS, medicalises female emotions by explaining in hormonal terms (Male anger
often seen as rational response to external pressures)




Gender bias (- in psych research)

May create misleading assumptions about female behaviour/validate discriminatory practices

Scientific justification to deny opportunities (e.g. due to PMS)

Damaging consequences on lives/prospects

,Gender bias (- promotes sexism in research process)

Lack of women at senior research level = female concerns not reflected in research questions asked

Men more likely to be published

Female ppts in inequitable relationship with researcher (power to label irrational/unable to complete
tasks)

Constitutional sexism - creates bias in theory/research




Gender bias (+ feminist psychologists suggest how to avoid)

Worrell & Remer:

Studied within meaningful real life contexts

Participate instead of objects of study

Study diversity within groups of women rather than comparisons to men

Collaborative research methods (qualitative data)

Preferable/less biased




Cultural bias

Psych claims to unearth universal truths but may only apply to particular groups studied



Wrongly assumed western findings would apply all over the world

E.g. conformity (Asch) and obedience (Milgram) produced different results outside of US

Standard/norm for behaviour judged from one culture = cultural differences seen as abnormal



Ethnocentrism: belief in superiority of own culture

Behaviour that doesn't conform to Western model = deficient

,E.g. Ainsworth's strange situation (American norms/values, separation anxiety defining, secure = ideal,
German mothers labelled cold/rejecting, inappropriate measure for non-US children)



Cultural relativism may help reduce bias

Facts/things only make sense from perspective of culture within which discovered



Berry:

Etic approach: looking at behaviours outside of culture and identifying universal

Emic approach: looking at behaviour within culture and identifying culturally specific

Imposed etic: e.g. Ainsworth studies within single culture and assumed could be applied universally




Cultural bias (- distinction between individuaism/collectivism)

Value of individual/independence vs value ofgroup/interdependence

Lazy/simplistic distinction, no longer applies

Takano & Osaka: 14/15 studies comparing US and Japan found no evidence of distinction between
culture types

Form of cultural bias less of issue than once was




Cultural bias (recognition of both relativism/universals)

Imposed etic shows culturally specific nature of psychology

Should not assume all psychology is culturally relative/no such thing as universal behaviour

Ekman: basic facial expressions for emotions same all over human/animal world

Attachment behaviours universal (imitation/interactional synchrony)

Full understanding requires study of both universals/variations among individuals/groups




Cultural bias (cross-cultural research prone to demand characteristics)

, Western cultures: familiarity with aims/objectives of scientific enquiry assumed

Cultures without historical experience of research, local populations more affected by demand
characteristics

Unfamiliarity with research tradition threatens validity of outcomes




Free will/determinism

Free will: we are self-determining

Free to choose thoughts/actions

Biological/environmental influences on behaviour but can reject

No cause/unpredictable

Humanistic approach



Determinism: behaviour shaped/controlled by internal/external forces

Hard = completely out of control, all has cause possible to identify, predictable, compatible with aims of
science

Soft = all has cause, conscious mental control over behaviour, behaviour predictable to extent, some
free will to make choices



Biological determinism

Biological approach, control from internal biological factors (physiological/genetic/hormonal)

Physiological processes not under conscious control (e.g. influence of ANS on stress/anxiety)

Genetic factors may determine behaviours/characteristics (e.g. mental disorders)

Hormones may determine behaviour (e.g. testosterone linked to aggression)



Environmental determinism

Popularised by behaviourist approach

Skinner: all result of conditioning

Choice = total sum of reinforcement contingencies acted upon during lives

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper StudyKey. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,63. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 77254 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€6,63  1x  verkocht
  • (0)
  Kopen