LA2 - Understanding Legal Reasoning, Personnel and Methods
Alle documenten voor dit vak (10)
Verkoper
Volgen
alfierahn
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Vicarious liability knowledge for a scenario:
Definition: VL is when liability is imposed on one person for the wrongful acts of another I.e and
employer being responsible for the torts of their employee. The tort committed must be connected
to their relationship. It’s a strict liability tort and joint liability. Reasons for this is because employers
have more money, employer profits off employee and easier to identify etc.
1: the commission of an underlying tort must have been committed by the employee.
2: employer employee relationship. The claimant must show that the tortfeasor is an employee if
they are to sue to the employer. An employee has a contract of service, not a contract for services,
e.g., a chauffeur has a contract of service, but a taxi driver has a contract for services. Various tests
for what's an employee.
Control test: traditional test. Looks at what control the employer has over the employee. [yewen]- a
servant is someone subject to command of their master’. But this isn't good anymore as many jobs
are complex and employer has less control e.g., surgeon.
Organisation test: tests whether the employee is a part of an organisation such as a DR to a hospital.
This was introduced in [Stephenson]. Independent contractors are an accessory to the business,
unless they are hired for the purpose of committing the tort [Ellis].
Multiple(economic)test: created in [ready mixed concrete]. Look at multiple factors such as where
and when they work, control, whether they can be fired, contract, pay, who pays tax and NI, do they
provide own equipment etc. This allows flexibility. A prisoner akin to employee in a prison kitchen
[cox]
3. tort committed in course of employment {Salmond test): employer is only liable if was done in
course of employment. This could be a wrongful act authorised by the employer [Poland]- hitting a
boy to stop stealing (impliedly authorised as benefits business). Or a lawful act that’s authorised but
done wrongly [century insurance]- smoked whilst delivering petrol...kaboom.
Cannot be on a frolic of one's own: if they are doing something outside their duties, employer not
responsible e.g. [Hilton]- accident when driving 7 miles away from were meant to be.
Criminal acts: no liable for criminal acts unless they have asked the employee to do it. However, HOL
in [lister] decided that criminal acts if so, closely connected to employment can hold employers to
account. [Morrisons]- punching customer in head and racist.
4: effect of VL: VL doesn’t take responsibility away from the employee as both can still be sued. And
the CLCA1978 allows the employer to require the employee to reimburse any damages they have
had to pay.
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper alfierahn. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €5,53. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.