College aantekeningen

Class notes BA Geography (L700) Political Ecology in the Global South

0 keer verkocht

Vak
BA Geography (L700)

Instelling
Cambridge University (CAM)

Who gets to use natural resources, and who is excluded? How do ideas about the environment influence ecologies, and how do ecologies influence ideas and power relations? In what manner does the governance and understanding of nature change across scales from the molecular to the global? This paper ...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 4 van de 71 pagina's

Bekijk voorbeeld

Geupload op 28 augustus 2023
Aantal pagina's 71
Geschreven in 2022/2023
Type College aantekeningen
Docent(en) Dr alexander cullen
Bevat Alle colleges

nature
environment
power
politics
ecology
resources
natural resources
pastoralism
swidden
mining
oil
conflict
resource conflict
war
landscape
land
tragedy of the commons
climate change
agr
governance

Instelling
Cambridge University (CAM)
Studie Onbekend
Vak
BA Geography (L700)

€5,61

In winkelwagen

Op verlanglijstje

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

Paper 3: Political Ecology in the Global South

Overview

Who gets to use natural resources, and who is excluded? How do ideas about the environment
influence ecologies, and how do ecologies influence ideas and power relations? In what manner
does the governance and understanding of nature change across scales from the molecular to the
global? This paper explores such questions through a central provocation of political ecology - that
environmental change, both material and discursive, affects changes in power and vice versa.

Taking various political ecology approaches, students are introduced to a series of case studies that
illustrate people-environment relations as connected to social, economic and political processes at
different scales. Of importance is exploring how power circulates, is resisted, and becomes imbued
in struggles over landscape. Although political ecology approaches are equally applicable to urban
and rural environments, the focus is predominantly on rural landscapes and the contestations within
them. Additionally, while acknowledging the connections across scales and between the north-
south, attention is given to emergent processes and struggles in global south case studies. The
course emphasizes the importance of understanding different environments as both 'social' and
'natural', as well as variable over time and space. It explores the nature of environmental science,
technologies, knowledge, discourse and narratives and their role in shaping environmental practices
and environmental policies and their outcomes.

Michaelmas Term

Lecture 1: Environments, knowledge, power
Overview:

● Introduce, define political ecology; Investigating power in its diverse ranges; ‘bottom-up’
o Integrating nature
▪ And its reproduction.

▪ Problematising ‘natural’- consider the power relations entangled within
the environment
● Illustrate shifts over time in understanding nature-culture and power – to add to the
scope on the foundations of political ecologies knowledge base
● Future directions

● Identify key components/concepts in political ecology analysis – who wins and who loses?

Trouble with (apolitical) natures:

● Afforestation and the global tree restoration potential (Bastin et al., 2019; Buscher et al.,
2017); apolitical responses to climate change mitigation with widespread negative
consequences

, o Privatisation - 11% total land, equivalent to US and China combined
o Politics of responsibility – time and money
o Defining land/forest and ownership – i.e. monoculture
o Serving palliative to the global crises, and uneven power relations
▪ Rendered technical

● But what is the history, discourses, politics

� WHO is ‘we’ and ‘our’? 🡨

Power/Agency (Human/more-than-human) 🡨🡪 Environment (Material/Discursive)

Putting politics first: ”All ecological projects (and arguments) are simultaneously political-economic
projects (and arguments) and vice versa” (Harvey 1993)

● Understanding of environmental change

● Ownership

● Livelihood quality and gender

Definition for political ecology:

‘Politics is inevitably ecological, and ecology is inherently political’ (Robbins, 2012)

“a confluence between ecologically rooted social science and political economy” (Peet & Watts
1996) - to investigating human–environment relations across scales to focus on questions of access
to and control over natural resources

“The concerns of ecology and a broadly defined political economy” (Brookefield and Blaikie 1987)

“Defines the environment as an arena where divergent actors with asymmetrical political power
compete for control and access of resources (Bryant & Bailey 1997) – to see that environmental
problems are not simply a result of (discourse) policy-failure or poverty, population or famine, but
rather a manifestation of political and economic processes from which they are created, notably
linked to the spread of capitalism.

Robbins (2011) asserts that the discipline has a "normative understanding that there are very likely
better, less coercive, less exploitative, and more sustainable ways of doing things" – to exposing
flaws in the dominant approaches to environments favoured by corporate, state and international
authorities, working to demonstrate the undesirable impacts of policies and market conditons
especially from the alternative viewpoint of the marginalised and vulnerable whilst proposing
solutions for it.

“Political ecology is a hatchet, cutting and pruning away the stories, methods, and policies that
create pernicious social and environmental outcomes” and also a seed by “evaluating and explaining
environmental change as well as explaining and determining the impact of ideas about
environmental change” Robbins (2011)

Loftus (2019) political Ecology is flexible and multi-layered in its research and can be applied to a
broad range of scopes and disciplines but still has much to gain ontologically

,(Peet and Watts, 2004); Essentially seeing that environmental issues are inherently social in origin,
and that the historical, political and economic contexts (re)produce its meaning

(i) why has certain knowledges been difficult to legitimate,
(ii) under what circumstances can such knowledge/practice be institutionalized without
co-optation or subversion?
(iii) how might it be systematized in policy

Key components and concepts of political ecology

● Reaction to apolitical ecology – technical solutions, ‘neutral’ scientific and expertise
knowledge
● Challenging normative, dominant environmental narratives/discourses.
o (Peet and Watts, 2004) Political ecology challenges Malthusian PPR explanations,
imbalances in market exchange or mismanagement for environmental issues,
instead centralising poverty as the leading cause and how it requires focusing on
nature-society relations.
● Re-approaching cartesian dualism discretely categorising ‘human’ and the ‘environment’,
instead co-producing and entangling assemblages
● Emphasizing ecology and politics in both material and immaterial forms

● Exposing contentious political understandings - Questioning trade-offs and responsibilities

● Geographical and time scale - Interconnectedness

Critique:
- Need for decolonising; “adheres to research practices and paradigms that have been
developed in the West, regardless of its diversity and dynamism as a field of research”
(Schulz, 2017)

Focus: Human-Environmental Issues

Five key aspects: (Robbins, 2011)

, THEMES WHAT RELEVANCE CASE EXAMPLE

Degradation and environmental Blame and environmental (Fairhead, 1996); “examines the
Marginalisation conditons and reasons degradation pitched in a changing local social and political
for their change larger political and relations which influence how
economic context people deal with land and vegetation
and, how regional poli-eco-graphic
changes shape local dynamics” in
Kissidougou

Rather than focusing on resources,
land is parameter for understanding
environmental issues in addition to
poverty as a proximate cause of
degradation and how poverty is
reproduced through determinate
structures or specific relations of
production in a chain of explanation
that can cross scales and scopes
when rendered in political, social,
historical, economic contexts. (Peet
and Watts, 2004)

environmental issue of
‘desertification’ in North-west
Namibia, assumed cause being the

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Direct to-the-point

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper mollyduxbury. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €5,61. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 69052 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Begin nu gratis