100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten
logo-home
Eerder door jou gezocht
Eerder door jou gezocht
logo
Summary CONLAW: Case Summaries for October Test €4,28
In winkelwagen
Snel navigeren naar
Voorbeeld
  2.  
  3. University Of Cape Town (UCT)
  4.  
  5. Constitutional Law (PBL2003W)

Samenvatting

Summary CONLAW: Case Summaries for October Test

2 beoordelingen
 15 keer verkocht
  • Vak
  • Constitutional Law (PBL2003W)
  • Instelling
  • University Of Cape Town (UCT)

these are in depth case summaries made by Kaya Borkowski and Jamie-Lou Ross. They contain: Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security, Christian Education South Africa v Minister of Education, National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality v Minister of Home Affairs,Thubakgale and Others v Eku...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 2 van de 16  pagina's

Document informatie

  • 25 september 2023
  • 16
  • 2023/2024
  • Samenvatting

Onderwerpen

  • conlaw

Geschreven voor

  • University of Cape Town (UCT)
  • Constitutional Law (PBL2003W)
Alle documenten voor dit vak (24)

2  beoordelingen

review-writer-avatar

Door: christopherjohnston • 1 jaar geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: tsepangteele1 • 1 jaar geleden

Great notes! In depth. Includes 16 cases from the semester. Explains Facts, Issues, the Courts decision and outcome as well as relevance of the case.

Verkoper

avatar-seller
LawGuru

Ontvangen beoordelingen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
PBL2003W
University of Cape Town

By Jamie-Lou Ross & K Borkowski




September Test Cases
PART 1: INTRODUCTION TO THE BILL OF RIGHTS, & INTERPRETING & APPLYING THE BILL OF RIGHTS

Litigating the Bill of Rights
Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security
Christian Education South Africa v Minister of Education
National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality v Minister of Home Affairs
Thubakgale and Others v Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality and Others


PART 2: FREEDOM RIGHTS

Ubuntu and Human dignity
S v Makwanyane and Another
Dawood v Minister of Home Affairs


The Right to Equality and ‘Remedial’ or ‘Restitutionary’ Measures
Harksen v Lane NO
Hoffman v South African Airways
S v Jordan and Others
Mahlangu and Another v Minister of Labour and Others.
Minister of Finance v Van Heerden.


Freedom of Expression & Hate Speech
Islamic Unity Convention v Independent Broadcasting Authority and Others
Afriforum and Another v Malema and Others
Nelson Mandela Foundation Trust v Afriforum NPC and Another
Qwelane v South African Human Rights Commission and Another
Afriforum v Economic Freedom Fighters and Others.




DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS ILLEGAL
PIERRE DE VOS; WARREN FREEDMAN; ZSA-ZSA BOGGENPOEL. 2021.
SOUTH AFRICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW IN CONTEXT SECOND EDITION.
OXFORD: OXFORD UNIV PRESS UK.

, PART 1: INTRODUCTION TO THE BILL OF RIGHTS, & INTERPRETING & APPLYING THE BILL OF RIGHTS


Litigating the Bill of Rights


Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2001 (CC)
Facts
● The applicant was sexually assaulted by a man who was awaiting trial for the attempted rape of another woman
● Concerns an indirect vertical application of a positive obligation in a dispute governed by common law
● Despite the seriousness of the alleged crime and the fact that the man had a prior rape conviction, the police and prosecutor had
recommended that the man be released pending trial
● The applicant sued the Minister for damages, arguing that the police and prosecutors had negligently failed to comply with a legal
duty they owed to her to take steps to prevent the man from causing her harm
● HC dismissed the applicant's claim & SCA affirmed, holding that the police and prosecution did not owe her a duty of protection
● Appeal to the Constitutional Court
Issue
● If police or prosecutors owed a duty of care to a victim of sexual violence, &, if so, whether that standard of care was breached?
Outcome
● State is obligated by Constitution to protect the dignity and security of women
● Police have positive obligations to protect the fundamental rights and freedoms contained in the BORs
● In the circumstances, the police recommendation for the assailant's release could amount to wrongful conduct giving rise to liability
● Ackermann and Goldstone JJ held that, although the major engine for law reform should be the legislature, courts are under a general
duty to develop the common law when it deviates from the spirit, purport and objects of the BORs.
● S 39(2) Constitution provides that when developing the common law, every court must promote the spirit, purport, and objects of the
BORs
● Prosecutors, who were under a general duty to place before a court any information relevant to the refusal or grant of bail, might
reasonably be held liable for negligently failing to fulfil that duty
● It was ordered that the matter be referred back to the HC for the trial to be continued.
● Obligation of courts to develop the common law, in the context of the s 39(2) objectives, is not purely discretionary.
● On the contrary, it is implicit in s 39(2) read with s 173 that where the common law as it stands is deficient in promoting the s 39(2)
objectives, courts are under a general obligation to develop it appropriately.
● BORs is used to develop the rules and remedies of the ordinary law so that the ‘objective normative value system’ that permeates the
Bill of Rights is given effect
Significance
● Decision set an important precedent with its recognition that sexual violence is not a private matter and that public officials have a
duty to protect women.


Christian Education SA v Minister of Education 2000 (C)
Facts
● Appellant applied for an order declaring s 10 South African Schools Act (SASA) - prohibited corporal punishment in public schools -
to be unconstitutional & invalid on grounds that it infringed inter alia their R to religious freedom guaranteed in s 15(1) Const

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Direct to-the-point

Direct to-the-point

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper LawGuru. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €4,28. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 68175 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Begin nu gratis
€4,28  15x  verkocht
  • (2)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd