100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Summary Part 1 minor, problems 1,2,3,4 - Minor Cross-Cultural Psychology (FSWP-K-3-6) €6,99   In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Summary Part 1 minor, problems 1,2,3,4 - Minor Cross-Cultural Psychology (FSWP-K-3-6)

 48 keer bekeken  2 keer verkocht

Summary - Minor Cross-Cultural Psychology (FSWP-K-3-6). Theme 1,2,3,4. (Part 1 minor)

Voorbeeld 4 van de 52  pagina's

  • 30 september 2023
  • 52
  • 2023/2024
  • Samenvatting
Alle documenten voor dit vak (28)
avatar-seller
itsross
Problem 1


THE SELF-CONCEPT – HEINE ET AL. (2010)

Independent vs interdependent self-concepts

 Self-concept = Not innate, shaped by cultural experiences, present already in
kindergarten-aged children
o Influence psychological processes as perception, cognition, motivation,
emotion and behavior
o Evidence of different self-concept  Twenty Statements Test
 Western cultures = Statements reflecting inner psychological
characteristics (attitudes, personality traits, abilities)
 Non-Western cultures = Statements indicating relational roles and
membership possessed

 Independent self-concept = Inner attributes reflecting the essence of a person
o Stable across situations and lifespan, unique, significant for regulating
behaviors, people feel obligated to publicly advertise themselves in ways
consistent with these attributes
 More common in Western cultures
 Interdependent self-concept = The self derives from relations with significant
others
o Attend how their behavior affects others and it is not so stable or unique,
rather embedded in a larger social group (e.g., Japanese person acting
different based on who is in the room)
 More common in not-Western cultures

Self-consistency vs flexibility

 Independent self = Relatively stable across situations  People would make
sacrifices in order to preserve a semblance of self-consistency
o Not much variability in emotions
 More research focused on this type
 Interdependent self = More unstable across situations  Depends on one’s
relationships
o More variability in emotions & contradictory self-views
 It does not mean that self-concept is unstable but context-specific
self-view!

Insider vs outside phenomenological experiences

 Insider = People prioritize their own perspective, thereby making sense of the
world in terms of how it unfolds in front of their own eyes  Independent
 Outsider = People prioritize the perspective of an audience and attend to the
world and themselves in terms of how they imagine it appears to others 
Interdependent
o E.g., East Asians are less impacted by the presence of a mirror because
they already consider themselves from the perspective of an audience

Multicultural selves

Two complementary perspectives:

 Multiple self-concepts  Both simultaneously accessible (e.g., Asian-American
performing intermediately on psychological tests compared to Asian in Asia)

,  Sequentially activated self-concepts  Frame-switching depending on
situations or primes
o Likely when the dual cultural identities are integrated rather than in
opposition & in second-generation immigrants
 People have multiple knowledge structures associated together
 One facilitates the activation of another part of the same network

! People with monocultural experiences also frame-switch but multicultural do it more

 Multicultural people are more creative and flexible

MOTIVATION

Motivation for self-enhancement and self-esteem

 Self-enhancement = Desire to view oneself positively
o More common in Western than not-Western cultures who attend negative
information about themselves in order to improve – Possible explanations:
 East Asians are more motivated to enhance their group selves
(Inconsistent)
 East Asians are more self-critical for domains considered important
to them (Inconsistent)
 East Asians are presenting themselves self-critically but privately
evaluate themselves in self-enhancing manners (Mixed)

Approach and avoidance motivation

 Western cultures = More evidence for approach motivation  People do not
want to lose their “face”
 Not-Western cultures = More evidence for avoidance motivation
o E.g., Opportunities to lose are more important, persist more on a task after
failure, more motivated by negative role models

Agency and control

 Independent cultures = World seen malleable and their selves stable  Sense
of primary control over perceptions, goals, wishes
o Stronger motivation for uniqueness
o Defend your honor
 Interdependent cultures = World seen stable and their selves malleable 
Likely to engage in secondary control strategies
o More likely to conform
o Power & agency concentrated in groups
 Critical life decision made my family and not the individual (e.g.,
Marriage)

RELATIONSHIPS

 Relationships hold a more privileged position in interdependent cultures and are
viewed in less conditional terms as compared to independent cultures
o They remain stable over the years and there are few opportunities to form
new relationship or dissolve existing ones
 In independent cultures = Relationship mobility  A relationship
must benefit both parts

Limitations: Database largely focused on North American and East Asians – Not all
processes are universal

, INDIVIDUALISISM VS COLLECTIVISM - MA AND SCHOENEMAN (1997)

Aim: The article compared Kenyan & American self-concept based on the Twenty
Statements Test (TST)

Cultural differences in self-concept

 Individualism (North America and norther and western Europe)
o People emphasize their private self and prioritize personal goals
 Egocentric, separate, autonomous, independent
 Based on exchange relationship with concern for equity
 Children encouraged to explore and to be autonomous
 Collectivism (Latin America, Asia, Africa)
o People emphasize relationships with others and prioritize collective goals
 Important attributes are public roles, statuses, relationships
 More likely to conform
 Children are taught obedience, reliability and proper behavior

 Hypotheses & Sample:
o Samburu and Maasai tribes expected to respond with more social
categories to the TST
o Nairobi sample expected to be less collective because of the urbanization,
modernization, westernization and education in the capital
o American college students sample expected to be individualistic
o Women expected to have higher percentages of social responses
 17 American college students, 15 Kenyan college students, 10
employed adults in Nairobi, 21 members of Maasai tribe and 18
members of Samburu Tribe

 Results
o Pastoral nomads in Kenya are more collective and had a less individualized
self-concept
o Decreased level of collectivism in Nairobi caused by urbanization,
development, modernization and education
 College students responded with fewer social categories than
university staff and hotel employees (who were older)  Likely to
be more traditional in self-concept
o Women in all groups have more social responses than men

 Limitations
o Small sample size
o Methodological issue  2 pastoral nomads group responded to TST in an
interview because the majority were illiterate while the rest in a written
form
o Interview TST was administered with a number of people presented while
the written form was completed individually


SUBJECTIVE CULTURE – TRIANDIS (2002)

 Culture = Shared pattern of beliefs, attitudes, norms, role perception & values
o Material culture = Dress, food, houses, highways, tools, machines
o Subjective culture = Language, economy, education, politics, law,
philosophy and religion
 Subculture = Shared other elements as gender, physical type,
neighborhood, occupation, standard of living…

, When studying culture it is important to check:

1. Whether or not ideas are shared
2. Whether shared responses correspond to a language, a time period and a
geographic region

ELEMENTS OF SUBJECTIVE CULTURE

Categories

 Categories are used to describe different stimuli (e.g., Colors)
o Some cultures have many words for a particular domain while others have
few words
 Etic categories = Occur universally
 Emic categories = Culture specific, associations
 Categories are linked to each other also as beliefs (e.g., Religion = If I believe  I
go the heaven; If I donate organs  I can save a life)

 Attitudes = Ideas charged with affect (emotion) predisposing action (e.g., “My
family"; I feel scared when I see a snake, so I go away)
 Norms = Ideas about behavior expected of members of a group
o Tight cultures = People are expected to behave as specified by norms or
you get punished
 Usually when a culture is homogenous, and people are very
interdependent
o Loose cultures = People are less likely to be punished, less strict
 Usually when a culture is under the influence of many other
cultures, people are not too interdependent, or supervision is
difficult
o Roles = Part of norms, correct behavior of people who hold a position in a
social group (e.g., Father)
 Prescriptive elements = What is recommended/established (e.g.,
Father should protect their daughters)
 Proscriptive elements = What is not allowed (e.g., Father should
not hit their daughters)

 Tasks = Sequence of behaviors (e.g., Passing a law)
 Values = Conceptions of the desirable states or behaviors
o Self-direction = Creativity, freedom, choosing own goals, curious
o Stimulation = Varied life, exciting life, daring
o Hedonism = Pleasure, enjoying life
o Achievement = Ambitious, successful, capable
o Power = Authority, wealth, social recognition
o Security = Social order, clean, health, sense of belonging
o Conformity = Obedient, self-disciplined, politeness
o Tradition = Respect for tradition, humble, devout
o Benevolence = Helpful, loyal, forgiving
o Universalism = Broadminded, social justice, world of beauty (e.g., Donate
organs)

 Value orientation
 Human nature: evil, neutral, mixture, good; mutable or immutable
 Man-nature-can: subjugation to, harmony with or mastery over
nature
 Human activities: being, being-in-becoming or doing
 Relationship of humans:
 Lineal (e.g., doing what the elders want)

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper itsross. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 66579 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€6,99  2x  verkocht
  • (0)
  Kopen