The Politics of Difference: “how power and political institutions categorize people into
groups and how this generates inequality”
Difference
- Protected in the private space
- Not present in the public sphere – public sphere is meant to be neutral
Public sphere
- Neutrality isn’t defined, it depends on the perspective and context
Take aways
- Not all differences are political, we’re interested in how and why some
differences become and remain political
- Defining what is “Normal” and what is “Different” is political
- Political scientists study differences between interests and identities
- Political theorists have often seen differences as best protected by respecting
individual freedom in the private sphere
- Critical theorists question the possibility of a neutral public sphere
- Describing difference – through statistics or otherwise – is political
Readings 2
Young
- The interest-based model of democracy presumes people cannot make claims on
others about justice or the public good
- Model of deliberative democracy
o Conceives democracy as a process that creates a public, citizens coming
together to talk about collective problems, goals, ideals, and actions.
o Mostly appears in the decision-making structures of voluntary
associations outside the state.
But also found in processes of state policy formation in
legislature or public hearings
o Participants come to a problem with an open mind, they are not bound by
prior norms or requirements
o Deliberation is both culturally neutral and universal
Lecture 2: Difference in Public
,The Public sphere is
- A communicative realm
- To discuss and debate the common interest and government
- Where the force of the better argument wins (coercion is absent)
- Where participants leave their status and identities behind
Public sphere as a realm of communication
- Places where people discuss and talk about politics
- Does not have to happen live, it can be online
Discussing the common interest
- May not be a subject of public concern
- TH Marshall: The ever going debate on who is a part of society and get to
contribute in it – who is able to have a voice?
o The first question the public faces
What is part of the common and what is the government?
- Key principle: the force of the better argument wins
o Potential for decisions to be made based on reason
A veil of ignorance
- A hypothetical state, in which decisions about social justice and the allocation of
resources would be made fairly, as if by a person who must decide on society’s
rules and economic structures without knowing what position they will occupy
in that society
Positionality
- All theory is for someone and some purpose
- Influenced by (in research):
o Method
o Gender
o Race/ethnicity
o Nationality
o Language
Bennett & Livingston
- Authoritarian stated perpetrate forms of information and use them as ways of
state control
- Three arguments on disinformation
o Confirmation bias: We begin our research with a set of beliefs. We
search for facts that confirm our beliefs
o Social media – no neutral arbiter
o State interference. The activity of foreign governments to look for
arguments
- Institutions: they prevent the proliferation of disinformation
- Loss of faith in political actors
Young
- “Deliberative democracy”
- Public = neutral sphere
, o Issues with that assumption
We are seeking arguments that can give us particular outcomes
- 3 ways to open up the public sphere
o Greeting
o Rhetoric
o Story telling
Recognizing positionality – Advantages
- Instead of encouraging pure objectivity, it encourages participants to reflect on
their positionality
- Instead of privileging the good of the (re)public, admits that the good of certain
groups may require unique solutions that go against the public interest
Take aways
- The public sphere is a realm of political debate where the better argument wins
- Political scientists debate how political truths are, but rarely whether truth is
possible
- Disinformation is the product of individual bias, social media, state interference
AND the erosion of institutions
- Communicative democracy places difference at the center of democratic debate
Week 2
Readings 3
Lecture 3: Religion
- Religion in Politics of Difference – Islam vs. west
- “Religion is on the rise”
o Driving force for politics
- More religious groups nowadays
- Religion as organized violence is a rising force
o But: religion has never gone away – foundation for modern politics
- Sovereignty: Hobbes
o Role of religion in society and politics
Religious tolerance as the foundation to the state system
- 30 years war – defining religion in your territory = sovereignty
- Diversity in religious models of tolerance
Secular politics
- Religion is thought of as a private concern
- Laicité = religion is kept outside
- Secular thought:
o Separation between church and state
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper kiaracampagne. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €7,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.