100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Extensive Summary - Conditional Skewness in Asset Pricing Tests Campbell R. Harvey and Akhtar Siddique JUNE 2000 €3,49
In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Extensive Summary - Conditional Skewness in Asset Pricing Tests Campbell R. Harvey and Akhtar Siddique JUNE 2000

2 beoordelingen
 261 keer bekeken  1 keer verkocht

This is an extensive summary. The research questions are explained, the underlying intuition my comment about it is provided and the main methodology is given. In this summary you can find a sentence or two about each graph and figure based on the authors conclusion. I also added some comments from...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 3 van de 26  pagina's

  • 9 oktober 2017
  • 26
  • 2017/2018
  • Samenvatting
Alle documenten voor dit vak (21)

2  beoordelingen

review-writer-avatar

Door: 1234567893 • 6 jaar geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: sachakipuw • 6 jaar geleden

avatar-seller
claudiughiuzan
Conditional Skewness in Asset Pricing Tests
CAMPBELL R. HARVEY and AKHTAR SIDDIQUE



Title, authors, journals

Title: Conditional Skewness in Asset Pricing Tests

Authors: CAMPBELL R. HARVEY and AKHTAR SIDDIQUE

Journal: THE JOURNAL OF FINANCE



ABSTRACT

- If asset returns have systematic skewness, expected returns should include rewards for
accepting this risk.
- We formalize this intuition with an asset pricing model that incorporates conditional
skewness.
- Our results show that conditional skewness helps explain the cross-sectional variation of
expected returns across assets and is significant even when factors based on size and book-
to-market are included.
- Systematic skewness is economically important and commands a risk premium, on average,
of 3.60 percent per year.
- Our results suggest that the momentum effect is related to systematic skewness.
- The low expected return momentum portfolios have higher skewness than high expected
return portfolios.




Research Question + underlying intuition

Research Question: Everything else being equal, do investors prefer portfolios that are right-skewed
to portfolios that are left-skewed?



Underlying intuition: In his 2000 paper in the Journal of Finance with Siddique, Harvey presents a
two-part argument in favour of incorporating skewness. First, asset returns are not normally
distributed. Second, investors like positive skew (big profits) and dislike negative skew (big losses);
Harvey argues these preferences need to be taken into account in both portfolio management and
risk management. Harvey also asserts estimates are imprecise and this uncertainty needs to be taken
into account when making investment decisions.

The results show that conditional skewness helps explain the cross-sectional variation of expected
returns across assets and is significant even when factors based on size and book-to-market are
included.

,The results suggest that the momentum effect is related to systematic skewness.

The low expected return momentum portfolios have higher skewness than high expected return
portfolios.

In probability theory and statistics, skewness is a measure of the asymmetry of the probability
distribution of a real-valued random variable about its mean. The skewness value can be positive or
negative, or undefined. The qualitative interpretation of the skew is complicated and unintuitive



One clue that pushed us in the direction of skewness is the fact that some of the empirical
shortcomings of the standard CAPM stem from failures in explaining the returns of specific securities
or groups of securities such as the smallest market-capitalized deciles and returns from specific
strategies such as ones based on momentum.




A positively skewed investment return means there were frequent small losses and a few
large gains.
Negatively skewed means there were frequent small gains and a few large losses.




- Managers may prefer portfolios with high positive skewness.



In probability theory and statistics, skewness is a measure of the asymmetry of the
probability distribution of a real-valued random variable about its mean. The skewness value
can be positive or negative, or undefined. The qualitative interpretation of the skew is
complicated and unintuitive



- THE SINGLE FACTOR CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL (CAPM) of Sharpe (1964) and Lintner
(1965) has come under recent scrutiny. Tests indicate that the crossasset variation in
expected returns cannot be explained by the market beta alone.

o SMB ((the difference between the return on a portfolio of small size stocks and the
return on a portfolio of large size stocks)

o HML ((the difference between the return on a portfolio of high book-to-market value
stocks and the return on a portfolio of low book-to-market value stocks)


- The goal of this paper is to examine the linkage between the empirical evidence on these
additional factors and systematic coskewness.

, Hypothesis: Everything else being equal, investors should prefer portfolios that are right-skewed to
portfolios that are left-skewed.




- Hence, assets that decrease a portfolio's skewness (i.e., that make the portfolio returns more
leftskewed) are less desirable and should command higher expected returns. Similarly, assets
that increase a portfolio's skewness should have lower expected returns.




One clue that pushed us in the direction of skewness is the fact that some of the empirical
shortcomings of the standard CAPM stem from failures in explaining the returns of specific securities
or groups of securities such as the smallest market-capitalized deciles and returns from specific
strategies such as ones based on momentum.




A positively skewed investment return means there were frequent small losses and a few
large gains.
Negatively skewed means there were frequent small gains and a few large losses.




- Managers may prefer portfolios with high positive skewness.

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper claudiughiuzan. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €3,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 56326 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€3,49  1x  verkocht
  • (2)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd