College aantekeningen
Summary Research methods in political science
Summary of the lectures given. Only lecture 13 is half.
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 4 van de 35 pagina's
Voorbeeld 4 van de 35 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Verkoper
Volgen
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
RESEARCH METHODSlecture one: tuesday 7 february
Examination:
- short weekly assignments (10% of final course grade)
- exam (90% of final course grade)
-> Monday 27 march 9:00-12:00
multiple choice (70%) and short open questions (30%)
—
Causes => events, decisions and actions => outcomes
but also Process => events, decisions and actions
scientific research:
● Theory: why? how? -Explanations & predictions
● Method: evidence? data? -Procedures & methods
● Analysis: description & Theory/Hypothesis testing
Naive science vs scientific method
Naive science is more for every day, you tend to come up with explanations all the time. An
intuitive presumption.
a) Personal experience
b) intuition
c) Authority
d) Appeals to tradition, custom and faith
e) Magic, superstition and mysticism
=> it might as well be wrong (no or biased inquiry)
scientific method
a) systematic process
b) falsifiable theories
c) replication
d) reflective and self-critical approach
e) Cumulative & SelfCorrecting Process
f) Cyclical Process
lecture two: friday 10 february
Philosophy of Social Science
- Positivism, Scientific Realism & Interpretivism
- Objectivity & Values
Ontology = What is the nature of the social world, e.g. is there an objective and/or subjective
reality?
Epistemology = What can we know about social phenomena?
Methodology = How do we gain/obtain knowledge?
,Positivism
French Philosopher August Comte (1798-1857) -> names in red, remember them!
Positivism: Search for the truth through systematic collection of observable facts
Sociology: Scientific study of the social world
Different positions:
1. Classical Positivism
2. Logical Positivism
3. Falsification (Popper)
1. Classical Positivism
Naturalism: Social Sciences = Natural Sciences
Empiricism: Knowledge of the world is limited to what can be observed and measured
(sensory experience)
Laws: Social world is subject to regular and systematic processes; laws are explanatory and
predictive. (gives us a casual explanation)
- Induction (observation -> theory)
- Cause-and-effect relationships (observable ‘constant conjunction’, David Hume)
Key assumption of this approach = science is objective and value-free
2. Logical positivism: Basic tenets
Empiricism + Logical Reasoning
- Deduction (theory -> observation)
- Retroduction (observation <-> theory)
=> in practice mostly used
Verification (establishing truth claims)
Induction & Deduction (& Retroduction) (!!!)
,Critique of logical positivism
Karl Popper (1902-1994)
Rejection of induction:
- Particular experience can never be general knowledge
- One counter-observation and law is falsified
- Deduction is the way
Rejection of verifiability
- Verification of theory pointless (only possible if there’s no contradiction)
- Goal must be falsification of theory (and replacement with a better theory)
Deductive-nomological model
Carl Gustav Hempel (1905-1997)
❖ An observed phenomenon is explained if it can be deduced from a universal law-like
generalization
❖ Law expresses necessary connection between properties, accidental generalization
does not
Hypothetico-deductive model
❖ Test ability of law to predict events
❖ Law -> Hypothesis -> Explicit Predictions
- Prediction correct -> Hypothesis corroborated/supported
- Prediction incorrect -> Hypothesis falsified/not supported
Challenge 1: scientific realism
-> Not everything can be directly observed
Similarities to Positivism
a) Social and natural worlds (sciences) are similar
b) Realism: ‘objective’ reality exists
Key Difference
a. Reality can consist of unobservable elements as well, e.g. structural relationships
b. Assessment by observable consequences
c. Causal mechanisms instead of law-like generalizations
‘Best’ theory is the one that explains phenomena the ‘best’
Example: Mechanisms (Charles Tilly)
Environmental: ‘externally generated influences on conditions affecting social life’
Cognitive: ’operate through alterations of individual and collective perceptions’
Relational: ‘alter connections among people, groups, and interpersonal networks’
, Individualism vs. Holism
Aan iemand vragen begrijp dit niet -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGaz0xKG060
Challenge 2: interpretivism
Fundamentally different from Positivism
Social world and natural world are fundamental different
-> different methods needed
Social World
- Subjectively created
- Understanding human behavior by interpretation of meaning of social behavior
Examples of approaches: Hermeneutics, Critical Theory, Constructivism, Post-Colonialism,
Feminism
But: Some similarities in collecting evidence and establishing causal relations
Objectivity and values
Difficult for positivist scholars (begrijp dit ff niet?)
“[O]ne can do a good job predicting what a study will find by knowing the preferences of the
scholars who undertook it.” - Robert Jervis (2002: 188)
Objective’ social world means ‘objective’ assessment?
Researchers have values -> Source of bias?
Critical theory: Yes, can’t be separated!
Positivism: Well, let’s distinguish:
1. Normative Theory (what ought or should be)
2. Empirical Theory (what is)
Robert Cox: All theory is normative.
Max Weber: Distinguish, yes, but values cannot be ignored (e.g. what is seen as relevant,
point of view)
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper liekevanlunen. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €8,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 53022 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen