Professor is Carolyn Decklerck. I think some political science people also have this course. This is a short but sufficient summary of Social Pyschology, I obtained a 14/20 studying this summary only. I advise you to also take a brief look at the research papers talked about in class when studying.
STUDYING THE SELF (AND OTHERS IN A SOCIAL WORLD) 1
HOW DO WE COME TO UNDERSTAND OTHERS & ONE-SELF
1. Understanding others: imitating them (an unconscious urge)
→ babies learn the world by reenacting others
Eg. synchronizing movement by yawning, couching, … = chameleon effect
Role of mirror neurons = a mechanism by which we imitate each other
(First found in monkeys: researcher grabbed smth, so did monkey, later also found in humans)
• They allow us to feel what others feel
o Power of horror movies (eg. see tarantula crawling over smn, you also feel it)
o Interpret where pain takes place by the kind of cry
→ embodied simulation: from mirror neuron systems to interpersonal relations
→ observing an action/emotion/sensation: evoked within us as if we experience it
• Implications:
o Learning about the world through imitation
(we’re separate beings: know where the personal stops and the other begins)
o Empathy – understanding of feelings of others
= activation of same regions in brain when seeing it as experiencing it
o Theory of mind – understanding of intentions of others
= what helps us to separate us from others
Eg. differing beliefs from yours (can be used to manipulate beliefs)
2. Understanding one-self: self-concept develops from learning in social context
→ feedback (testing how others react on our action) affects future perceptions, choices, behavior
→ development of who we are, who we think we are through interactions with others
Eg. you think you are funny:
ppl laugh with your joke = positive feedback, validation of self-concept, continue to be ‘funny’
ppl don’t laugh = negative feedback, update self-concept, no longer see yourself as funny
Importance of self-concept to us:
• Self-referencing effect we compare our performances w others (meaning of scores)
• Spotlight effect we overestimate the attention ppl are paying to us
• Illusion of transparency ppl don’t notice the mistakes we make (eg. bad haircut)
We are bad at predicting our own behavior → friends & family better at it than us (certain aspects)
• Ethics and virtues
• Professional competence (managers rate themselves more competent)
• College entrance examinations (ppl predict they stand higher than they actually do)
• Driving ability (everybody thinks they are above-average drivers)
We deceive ourselves when trying to explain our behavior → overestimate ourselves, put us in best position
• Self-serving bias
• Unrealistic optimism (consequences: gambling losses, stock market crashes)
• False consensus and uniqueness
o False consensus: overestimate number of ppl doing same bad things as us
o False uniqueness: underestimate the number of ppl that do same good things as us
,INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN SELF-CONCEPT 2
1. Self-esteem → high self-esteem = deemed positive: well-being, positive thinking
BUT boosting self-esteem not always desired effects (aggression)
Research: Baumeister
• Perceived/claimed advantages: more likeable, better relationships, better impressions on others, more loyal,
speak up in group, happy (<-> low self-esteem: depression, externalizing behavior, underperforming)
• Findings:
o Fosters some good initiatives but also bad (experimenting w drugs & sex, dangerous behaviors)
o Boosting it has no effect on academic performance, but good performance → high self-esteem
o Variable effects on job performances: occupational stress boosts self-esteem
(overcoming stress = accomplishment → proud of yourself)
o It does not make for good leadership, but good leaders have high self esteem
• Interaction between narcissism and self-esteem (threatening esteem of narcissists → aggression)
2. Self-efficacy = belief you can achieve, accomplish things → increases changes you succeed
• Contributing factors:
o Social persuasion, modeling (believing in & supporting you), experience (success motivates)
o Correlates with perceived control
• Research: relation between self-efficacy and performance success
3. Perceived control = taking some credit for the things that happen to you good or bad
→ Absence leads to learned helplessness (thinking you have no control over what happens to you)
→ High level positive outcomes
• workers in organizations, prisoners, homeless shelters
• citizens from countries w more perceived freedom (vs. restricted freedom) experience greater satisfaction
generalized perceived control = stable personality characteristic → locus of control:
• internal = I control my destiny it is a spectrum → most ppl in the middle
• external = others control my destiny
locus of control predictive value with respect to:
o career and academic performance (ppl with internal locus of control are achievers
o management practices but not necessarily happier: illusion of control)
o sports, health, delinquency
moderate locus of control more advantageous in social situations, not bound to performance, when there is
adequate social support (eg. recovering from cancer) + more open to social relations, so more support
!!! positive self-concept maintained by self-efficacy, being in control, and social support → why self-concept so important?
Hypothesis: it guarantees group membership and avoids social exclusion
→ experienced or perceived social exclusion:
• causes pain like physical pain (activates same brain regions)
• increases impulsive spending
• causes reduction in intelligent reasoning
• interferes with self-regulation (impaired attention, giving up on tasks, eating a lot of cookies, …)
• increased lethargy (no time perception)
• causes less prosocial behavior like helping
• weakens affiliative responses to new interaction partners
→ group-belonging as fundamental human drive: ppl don’t want to be excluded so they behave in line with group
→ we try to maintain a self-image to fulfill the need to belong
→ may be blind to self-deception and ways in which we are affected by environment to safeguard group belonging
, JUDGING ONE-SELF AND OTHERS → inaccuracy and prone to biases:
1. Contrast effect (eg. you don’t want to give your presentation after someone who did excellent)
2. Self-fulfilling prophecy = starting to behave in line with expectations made of you by others
3. Fundamental attribution error (how we explain the behavior of others)
Attribution = assigning a cause to behavior
Dimension = internal/external cause of behavior
• Internal: because of who you are (personal reasons)
• External: because of your environment/situation/context (eg. late bus)
“We discount the situation” – Lee Ross
= tendency to hold a person accountable rather than checking environment when explaining someone’s behavior
→ underestimating situational influences and overestimating personal factors
Real life implications: blaming people for failures instead of acknowledging situational difficulties
→ more in individualistic countries (eg. student-teacher/boss-employee relationship)
Why? Actor-observer asymmetry and visual salience (perceptual error) vs. perspective-taking (motivational bias)
4. Self-serving bias (how we explain our own behavior: portray ourselves in good light)
= tendency to attribute bad outcomes to situation and good outcomes to self
Eg. group’s individual estimations of how much they each contributed sumps up to more than 100%
Why? Result of self-serving motives: self-esteem motivation drives self-serving bias
• Exaggerate other’s failures to reduce impact of own failure
• Exaggerate own accomplishments while reducing that of others to show superiority
→ motivation to maintain self-esteem = gauge to alert us to threat of social rejection:
“as long as I have good self-esteem and am above average, the group will not want to get rid of me”
(can backlash: importance of balance)
RESEARCH PAPER: BODY CAMERA FOOTAGE LEADS TO LOWER JUDGMENTS OF INTENT THAN DASH CAMERA FOOTAGE
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper tamest_0meets. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €4,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
