Summary for all of the following papers!
Week 1:
1. Yang, M., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (2007). The effectiveness of brand placements in the movies:
Levels of placements, explicit and implicit memory, and brand-choice behavior. Journal of
Communication, 57 (3), 469-489.
2. Cheung, C. M. Y., S...
Is this review believable? A study of factors affecting the credibility of online consumer
reviews from an ELM perspective (Cheung, Sia, and Kuan)
Study examines four information cues used to evaluate the credibility of online reviews:
1. Argument quality
2. Source credibility
3. Review consistency
4. Review sidedness
Summary of the findings
Argument quality (central cue) was the primary factor affecting review credibility
Individuals relied on peripheral cues (such as source credibility, review consistency,
and review sidedness) when evaluating online consumer reviews
Review sidedness had a stronger impact on review credibility when the recipient had
a low involvement level and a high expertise level
Elaboration likelihood model (ELM)
understanding how people process messages
that are intended to be persuasive; there are two
routes including a central route (= high level of
elaboration) and peripheral route (=low level of
elaboration); degree of elaboration through the
central or peripheral route depends on the
individual’s ability and motivation
Central cue argument quality
The audience’s subjective perception of the arguments in the persuasive message as
strong and cogent on the one hand versus weak and specious on the other
Determines one’s attitude towards a message primarily through careful deliberation
about the merits of the arguments presented; a message with stronger arguments is
expected to yield more favourable responses
Peripheral cues
Source credibility recipient’s perception of the credibility of a message source; it
is not concerned with the message itself; has a positive effect on message credibility
Review consistency the extent to which information in a review is consistent with
information in other reviews; information consistency is a heuristic cue that affects
knowledge adoption
Review sidedness whether a review is one sided (= contains either positive or
negative product comments) or two sided (= contains both positive and negative
comments on a product); a two-sided message is often perceived as more believable
Recipient’s expertise and involvement the degree of influence that results from the
central or the peripheral cues depends on the recipient’s ability and motivation
Recipient’s expertise the recipient’s prior knowledge about the issue
, Recipient’s involvement the personal relevance of the issue
Central cues will have a greater influence on judgement when a recipient is able and
motivated to consider the information given in a message
People will a high level of involvement are sufficiently engaged and motivated to
understand the message
The influence of argument quality is stronger when the recipient has high expertise
and involvement
When the recipient in unable or not motivated to consider the information, peripheral cues
have a greater role in shaping judgement (people without the relevant expertise cannot assess
the quality of the message)
The influence of peripheral cues is stronger when the recipient has low expertise and
involvement
Discussion
Argument quality is the most influential factor in the evaluation of online consumer reviews
in the context of online consumer reviews, the influence of argument quality did not vary
across different levels of expertise and involvement
Explanation 1: people typically make a deliberate choice to visit online consumer
review sites to search for information to facilitate their decisions (are somehow
motivated to elaborate)
Explanation 2: the information in online reviews does not require exceptionally high
levels of expertise
People also rely on peripheral cues to evaluate online consumer reviews the degree of
reliance on the peripheral cues depends on the recipient’s expertise and involvement levels
HOWEVER, the moderation effects of involvement and expertise are more situation
dependent and complex
People who are involved and knowledgeable rely more on central cues (argument quality).
However, people who were not involved or knowledgeable did not necessarily rely more on
peripheral cues. Thus, consumers rely more on source credibility and review consistency in
the evaluation of online reviews when their expertise level is low, but involvement is high.
Explanation: an information cue can be both a peripheral cue or a central cue
depending on the situation when people are not motivated, reviews were perceived
more positively when they covered both positive and negative aspects because these
reviews seemed to be fair; when people are not involved, review sidedness is more a
peripheral cue
People with a high expertise level perceived two-sided reviews more favourable and people
with a low expertise level preferred one-sided reviews.
Explanation: people rely on online consumer reviews to facilitate their purchase
decisions; reviews that provide both positive and negative information are useful if
people are able to judge the validity of the information a knowledgeable user can
judge the significance of the pros and cons and make a final decision independently
The effectiveness of brand placements in the movies: levels of placement, explicit and
implicit memory, and brand-choice behaviour (Yang & Roskos-Ewoldsen)
, The study focused on the effect of three different levels of visual brand placements: in the
background (= when the product is shown with one of the main characters, but the character
does not use the product), used by the main character (= when the product is used by one of
the main characters), and as a story connection (= when the product is used as an enabler in
the story line). Additionally, the study explored the influence of brand placements using both
explicit and implicit measures of memory.
Summary of the findings
1. Levels of brand placements influence recognition of the target brand and attitudes
towards the brand
2. Simple placement of the brand within the movie influenced implicit memory and the
implicit choice task
Brand placements the paid inclusion of branded products or brand identifiers, through
audio and/or visual means, within mass media programming
The landscape model looks at the relationship between online processing of a story and
the memorial representation of that story
Discussion
Prediction of landscape model: during the comprehension process, background brand
placements have minimal level of activation, brand placements used by a main character have
a moderate level of activation and brand placements that are integral to the story have the
highest level of activation.
Findings supporting the prediction: individuals recognized the brand more when the
brand was used by the main character or when the brand was integral to the story than
when the brand was featured as a background.
Finding contrary to the prediction: no significant difference in recognition between
the main character using the brand or when it was related to the unfolding of the story.
Levels of placement influence explicit memory
Results of the implicit memory test the mere presence of the brand in the movie improved
individual’s implicit memory for the products
Levels of placement did not influence implicit memory
Explicit and implicit measures of memory are sensitive to different influences of brand
placements on memory
People’s attitudes toward the brand had a reliable influence on their choices, but brand
placements did not influence the choice behaviour.
People who saw the target brand in the movie were more likely to choose that brand
When the brand was used by the main character, people expressed more positive attitudes
toward the brand than when the product was presented in the background or when the brand
was part of the unfolding story
Insights for real-life brand placements
If the intention is to gain recognition of the brand want brand to be used by a main
character or play a role in the unfolding story
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper lotteroukema99. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €5,39. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
