100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Summary Constitutional Law 271 Part 2C (2023) €3,51   In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Summary Constitutional Law 271 Part 2C (2023)

 4 keer bekeken  0 keer verkocht
  • Vak
  • Instelling

In this document you will find a comprehensive set of notes including class notes, slides, case discussions and textbook readings. It emphasises the important topics for test purposes.

Voorbeeld 2 van de 8  pagina's

  • 23 oktober 2023
  • 8
  • 2023/2024
  • Samenvatting
avatar-seller
2. Bill of Rights Litigation:



(C): Remedy Stage
 S172 Constitution

Introduction:
- Get to this stage when court finds that limitation = unjustifiable
- Declarations of invalidity confirmed by CC
o Confirms order & may vary remedy granted by lower court

Remedies:
- Direct application of BOR
o Most in a vertical relationship
- S172(1)(a):
o When deciding a constitutional matter, a court
 (a) must declare that any law or conduct that is inconsistent with
the constitution as invalid to the extent of its inconsistency
o Remedy: Declaration of invalidity
o No discretion when found that violation cannot be justified
- Declaration of invalidity not always enough
- Need to remedy harm that may have occurred / remedy defect causing harm
- S172(b):
o Court may make an order that is just and equitable including
 (i) An order limiting the retrospective effect of the declaration of
invalidity
 (ii) An order suspending the declaration of invalidity for any
period and on any conditions
- S38:
o Anyone listed in this section has the right to approach a competent
court, alleging that a right in the BOR has been infringed or threatened,
and the court may grant appropriate relief, including a declaration of
rights

In SA: Flexible approach to granting remedies
- Fose v MSS:
o Left to court to decide what would be appropriate relief
  relief that is required to protect and enforce the CT; if
necessary, court may have to fashion new remedies to secure
protection and enforcement of these NB rights
 = BROAD discretionary power to decide “appropriate relief”
- What limits court’s ability to fashion new remedies?
o SOP Concerns

, o = not court’s responsibility to make and execute laws

Private violation of fundamental rights – S8(2):
- Direct horizontal application of BOR
o S8(3): a court
 (a) In order to give effect to right must apply, or if necessary,
develop the CL to extent that legislation does not give effect to
that right
o Remedy: not in legislation; development of CL
- When done so – have regard to S39(2)
o Spirit, purport & objects of BOR
- Also – court keep in mind that not engine of law = incremental development

Indirect application:
- Relief in terms of interpretation of legislation / development of common law or
customary law
- Remedy: reading down
o Mandatory rule of statutory interpretation  attempt to avoid
declaration of invalidity
 Use BOR to bring law in line with the CT = indirect application
o May be done if legislative provision is reasonably capable of being
interpreted in conformity with CT

Purpose of constitutional remedies:
- Vindicate constitutional rights & constitution and deter future infringements by
legislature or private parties
- Ideal construct of a constitutional world = adherence to fundamental
democratic values based on human dignity; equality & freedom
o Synchronise with real world where violations occur (Fose v MSS)

Factors relevant in considering appropriate remedy:
- Constitutional remedies must generally be
o Forward-looking (to achieve aim of democratic society)
o Community orientated
 When rights are violated – harm usually suffered by a whole
community
 Remedy crafted to protect entire community > individualistic
approach to remedy
o Structural
 Tries to correct constitutional structure (as envisaged in CT)
- Remedies must be effective:
o Hoffman v SAA:
 SAA policy – don’t employ HIV+

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper siobhandebruyn. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €3,51. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 67866 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€3,51
  • (0)
  Kopen