100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Overig

Oefenvragen (essay) Algemene Emotieleer

Beoordeling
2,8
(4)
Verkocht
20
Pagina's
3
Geüpload op
17-12-2017
Geschreven in
2017/2018

Essayvragen en MC vragen met antwoorden

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Oefenvragen Algemene Emotieleer
College 2: Describe the ‘facial feedback’ hypothesis. How could studies using Botox help test this
hypothesis, and what are the strengths and weaknesses of this approach?
According to the facial feedback hypothesis, our facial expressions can influence our feelings via
feedback from the face to the brain (e.g., Izard, 1971; Tomkins, 1962). The strong version of the
facial feedback hypothesis states that facial sensory feedback determines what emotion people
experience. The weak version states that the sensory feedback determines the intensity of the
emotions people experience. One way to study this hypothesis is to inhibit facial expressions, for
example using Botox (Davis et al, 2011). Botox allows for a test of causal claims of facial
feedback. According to the facial feedback hypothesis, individuals injected with Botox should
experience less intense emotional experiences than participants who receive a sham injection.
Advantages are the causal efficacy and specificity of the manipulation, and the fact that
participants need not be aware of the hypothesis. Some disadvantages are challenges with
keeping participants blind to the manipulation, and a dilemma between ethical concerns with
random allocation vs unrepresentative sample (people who want to have Botox may differ from
the general population). Social interactions may also be affected by the person having reduced
facial movement and looking younger, making it difficult to establish whether changes in
experience are due to facial or social feedback.
College 3: Outline the characteristics of embarrassment, including what differentiates it from
shame and guilt.
Embarrassment is based around a perceived negative self-presentation, and is less intense than
shame and guilt - this makes sense as it also tends to occur following more trivial transgressions
than the other two. Embarrassment is characterised by feeling foolish and being concerned
about the social evaluation of oneself (Buss, 1980), unlike shame where one feels a deeper sense
of worthlessness. Embarrassment is caused by breaking social conventions and can
consequently only occur in public situations, unlike guilt and shame that can occur when one is
alone (Edelmann, 1981). Finally, while shame and guilt lack nonverbal signals, embarrassment is
uniquely associated with blushing (Miller, 2004).
Explain the function(s) of embarrassment.
Embarrassment is associated with a sequence of non-verbal behaviours including averted gaze,
turned head, inhibited smile, face touching (Keltner, 1995; Keltner & Buswell, 1997). It is thought
that the expression of embarrassment triggers empathy, given that people who display
embarrassment after social transgressions are perceived more positively (Semin & Manstead,
1982). Embarrassment also serves an appeasement function, as it elicits forgiveness in the
perceiver towards the person expressing embarrassment, which can help to restore social
connections (Keltner & Anderson, 2000).
College 4: Describe at least three different motives for why we share our emotions with others
(social sharing).
We share our emotions with others for several reasons. One is that we seek social support. This
can involve emotional support, such as help with re-appraising an event, or practical hands-on
help. Social support also includes physical support like hugs. Talking about emotions can help in
the development of close relationships (Thoits, 1984). Another reason for social sharing is social
comparison. This means that we seek input from others on whether our own feelings in a given
situation are considered appropriate. This is preferably done with others who are similar to
ourselves (Festinger, 1954). A third reason that we engage in social sharing is for social

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
17 december 2017
Aantal pagina's
3
Geschreven in
2017/2018
Type
OVERIG
Persoon
Onbekend

Beoordelingen van geverifieerde kopers

Alle 4 reviews worden weergegeven
3 jaar geleden

6 jaar geleden

7 jaar geleden

7 jaar geleden

2,8

4 beoordelingen

5
0
4
1
3
2
2
0
1
1
Betrouwbare reviews op Stuvia

Alle beoordelingen zijn geschreven door echte Stuvia-gebruikers na geverifieerde aankopen.

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
blackbirdtje Universiteit van Amsterdam
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
223
Lid sinds
10 jaar
Aantal volgers
145
Documenten
26
Laatst verkocht
5 maanden geleden

3,7

53 beoordelingen

5
10
4
26
3
13
2
1
1
3

Populaire documenten

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen