100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Terrorism & Counterterrorism Lecture notes + reading summary €5,99   In winkelwagen

College aantekeningen

Terrorism & Counterterrorism Lecture notes + reading summary

 13 keer bekeken  1 keer verkocht

Lecture notes on Terrorism & Counterterrorism (2021), and summary of required readings (2021)

Voorbeeld 4 van de 120  pagina's

  • 23 november 2023
  • 120
  • 2021/2022
  • College aantekeningen
  • Dr. bart schuurman & dr. yannick veilleux-lepage
  • Alle colleges
Alle documenten voor dit vak (16)
avatar-seller
yvankaverberne
Terrorism & counterterrorism
Yvanka Verberne, s2806940

Lecture 1: What is (counter)terrorism? 01-11-2021
What is terrorism?
Two main observations:
1. No commonly accepted definition exists
2. Highly politicized debate
a. ‘terrorist’ is everyone we don’t agree with?
More than an academic problem:
 (counter)terrorism can affect entire populations
 Nuanced & critical approach key to informed citizenship

The definitional debate
Ongoing since field’s inception
 Negative connotations ‘terrorism’
 Subjective; freedom fighters v terrorists
 Too infrequent to generalize?
Results:
 Condemnation rather than description
 Terrorism as a definitional weapon;
o Prescribes and rules out policy responses?
o Normatively influences research agenda?
 Difficulties of building upon others’ research

2020 Global Terrorism index – measuring the impact of terrorism




Small example how definition can have a big impact

On definitions
What is a definition’s purpose?
 Descriptive
 Clear demarcations
 Objective and neutral
Various types (legal, governmental, academic)
 How can they impact research?
 How can they influence debate?
 intersection of perspectives from Law & Criminology, Public Policy & Governance

Little consensus on defining terrorism.

1

,What about elements of a definition?
1. Violence, force
2. Political
3. Fear, terror emphasized
4. Threat
5. (psychological) effects and (anticipated) reactions
6. Victim-target differentiation
7. Etc. (Schmid & Jongman, 1988)

Clarity through comparison
 Terrorism v insurgency (goals, organisation requirements, rel. to populace)
 Terrorism v organized crime
o Organizes crime = financial
o Terrorism = political oriented
 Terrorism v terror
o State
 Terrorism v war
o Terrorism is one of many ways in which you can make war

Schmid’s 2011 definition of terrorism
“Terrorism refers on the one hand to a doctrine about the presumed effectiveness of a special
form or tactic of fear-generating, coercive political violence and, on the other hand, to a
conspiratorial practice of calculated, targeting mainly civilians and non-combatants,
performed for its propagandistic and psychological effects on various audiences and conflict
parties’
 victim vs target

Terrorism as violent communication
 Attack on Theo van Gogh, November 2004
 Some of the letters written by the attacker
The more horrible your action, the better able as terrorist you are to keep the attention to you

Different kinds of terrorism
 Emphasis on the historical discipline
Left-wing
 Marxist / Leninist, revolutionary, struggle for a class-less society. Defined terrorism
1960s-1980s
Right-wing
 Mistrust of government, conspiracy theories, racist, neo-fascist, highly conservative,
religious. 22 July trailer
Nationalist / separatist
 Self-determination, anticolonial, strong driver insurgency
Stateterror
 Large-scale violence to intimidate or control poopulations. Numerous examples, e.g.
Europe, Latin-America. Film: Das Leben der Anderen
Religious
 Revolutionary, millenarian, reform or destruction, (other)wordly goals
Criminal
 FARC? Taliban? IRA? Mob-activities?
Single issue

2

,  Not focused on a particular ideology, but a particular grievance
Lone actor
 Individuals who plan, prepare & execute attacks in isolation
Cyber
 The increasing importance of the Internet

There are more number of Attacks and Plots in the Right-wing, but the focus stays at
religious  it is changing; attack at mosques gave more insight to the right-wing
More than just jihadists alone

 Contemporary terrorism is about more than jihadism
 Emphasis on jihadism explained / justified by their deadliness
 Danger of another ‘failure of imagination’

Conclusion
1. Terrorism as a quintessential ‘contested concept’
2. Familiarity with the definitional debate as key learning outcome
3. Schmid and ‘terrorism as demonstrative violence’
4. Terrorism is not exclusively a non-state activity and knows many forms
5. Counterterrorism as a continuum of interventions

Lecture 2: Political Violence and State-Terrorism, 03-11-
2021
Critiques of Terrorism Research argues that post 9/11 scholarship:
 Is ahistorical
 Treats terrorism as emerging in a social vacuum
 Lacks-multi-level analysis
 State-centric
 Focuses on secondary rather than primary data
 Is policy oriented

Advantages of Social Movement Theory
 Relocates terrorism within its social and temporal context
 De-exceptionalizes terrorism
 Underlines its temporal fluidity; political violence does not stay the same
 Counters ahistoricity and lack of context of terrorism research
 Integrates macro, meso, and micro level explanations
 Brings the state into focus
 Brings international movement dynamics into focus
Social Movement theory, an interdisciplinary study that seeks to:
1. Explain why social mobilization occurs
2. Explains how social mobilization manifests
3. Explains potential social, cultural, and political consequences of social mobilization
The approach rejects classical approaches such as:
 Collective behavior theory;


3

, o When lot of people together, people start feeling invisible. No longer
constrained by power of state.
o Riots
 Mass society theory
o Societies became big + complex, wide societal system.
o family, church diminish in importance > rise of terrorism
 Relative deprivation
o When people look at others, and believe they got it better then them. They get
angry and rebel.
o Try to get the bigger slice
Social movement theory
SMT finds its roots in the growth of social movement activity in both Europe and the United
States during the 1960
‘Deprivation’ was not seen as a viable explanation anymore.
Instead, structural approaches examined how the social and political context enabled or
hinder protests

Social movements define
“collective challenges [to elites, authorities, other groups or cultural codes] by people with
common purposes and solidarity in sustained interactions with elites, opponents and
authorities.” He specifically distinguishes social movements from political parties and
advocacy groups.”
“a set of opinions and beliefs in a population which represents preferences for changing
some elements of the social structure and/or reward distribution of a society.”
“(1) the formation of some kind of collective identity; (2.) the development of a shared
normative orientation; (3.) the sharing of a concern for change of the status quo and (4.) the
occurrence of moments of practical action that are at least subjectively connected together
across time addressing this concern for change.”

Tilly defines Social Movements
Tilly is professors crush => EXAM!
Tilly’s work emphasizes how dynamics of social protest are tied to their political, social and
economic context.
Tilly defines social movements as a series of contentious performances, displays and
campaigns by which ordinary people make collective claims on others.
Tilly argues that there are three major elements to a social movement: (but we only look at 2)
1. Campaigns; a sustained, organized public effort making collective claims of target
authorities.
a. Actors; claim-makers, object of claim, (protestors vs company)
2. Repertoire; employment of combinations of techniques of political action
Repertoires of Contention: “Arrays of contentious performances that are currently
known and available within some set of politics actors”



4

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper yvankaverberne. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €5,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 77988 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€5,99  1x  verkocht
  • (0)
  Kopen