Samenvatting
Summary Problem 6 - I feel pretty, oh so pretty
- Instelling
- Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam (EUR)
Self study problem 6
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 3 van de 18 pagina's
Voorbeeld 3 van de 18 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Laura Heijnen – Organisational Psychology: Performance at WorkProblem 6. I feel pretty, oh so pretty
Do physical attributes influence career, and why?
Are there evolutionary processes at work in the employment market?
Does discrimination play a role in these differences?
ü Judge, Hurst, & Simon (2009) – Does it pay to be smart, attractive, or confident (of all three)?
Relationships among general mental ability, physical attractiveness, core self-evaluations, and income
Introduction
- Inside = personality + intelligence do influence career success, but also attractiveness.
- Mediators: employer + customer discrimination, occupational sorting + differential
outcomes in marriage market.
- Attractiveness related to personal characteristics, developed through process of
expectancy confirmation: stereotypes regarding attractiveness elicit expectations à
consistently differential judgment + treatment à outcomes are internalised + cause
development of differential behaviour, traits + self-views.
- Hypothesis: educational attainment + core self-evaluations (= general self-concept)
are influenced by attractiveness + should mediate effects of attractiveness on income.
Longitudinal data. Including intelligence as possible mediator à possibly explaining
more variance in income + shedding light on relative importance.
- Aim: to consider how self-concept affects financial strain, which influences
productivity + is implicated in overall well-being. Income alone doesn’t explain
financial worries: also consider financial knowledge, attitudes, goals + behaviours.
- Suggest that unlike attractiveness + intelligence, core self-evaluations influence
financial strain not only indirectly via influence on income but also directly.
Theory + hypotheses
- Direct effects of attractiveness on income, education + core self-evaluations:
o 68% of attractive adults above mean on occupational success, while only 32%
unattractive adults à Hypothesis 1a: physical attractiveness is positively
associated with income.
o Previous research found positive link between attractiveness + educational
attainment: attractive people à
§ From early age, receive more encouragement in academic endeavours
than unattractive people.
§ Intellectual + academic competence judged more positively.
§ Receive more attention + are subjects to positive interactions (e.g.,
instructional assistance, positive reactions) with others, and fewer
negative ones (e.g., aggression, punishment, negative feedback).
§ Better treatment in academic settings à advantages: social support à
higher academic achievement + motivation, which are positively
associated with educational attainment.
à Attractive children benefit from having more resources supportive of
academic achievement à more likely to finish high school + go to college à
Hypothesis 1b: physical attractiveness is positively associated with educational
attainment.
1
, Laura Heijnen – Organisational Psychology: Performance at Work
o Core evaluations: self-esteem, generalised self-efficacy, emotional stability
(neuroticism) + locus of control. Not yet studied self-concept as possible
mediator of effects of attractiveness.
o Attractiveness should influence global self-concept in 3 ways:
§ Global-self-worth strongly influenced by warmth + approval of others.
Feedback often given to attractive people early.
§ Global self-concept is based on perceived competence in areas of
personal important, which likely include appearance (because
pervasive in multiple domains).
§ Stigma of being unattractive, often accompanied by negative judgment
+ treatment, may lead to perception of high level of external constraint
(= aspect of locus of control).
o Correlations between appearance + global self-worth high (.70 - .80). Other
studies found moderate but still positive relationships between attractiveness
+ observed and self-reported self-confidence/esteem in children, competence
+ mental health (+/- .15). Attractiveness found to be positively related to
confidence in abilities, emotional stability (in men) + control beliefs à
Hypothesis 1c: physical attractiveness is positively associated with core self-
evaluations.
- Direct effects of general mental ability on income, education + core self-evaluations:
o Positive influence on cognitive ability (.27)/attractiveness on income +
evidence that intelligence affects educational attainment: intelligence
positively influences learning + success at skills acquisition à positive spiral in
which relatively more intelligent students receive psychosocial + instrumental
support as result of successes.
§ Hypothesis 2a: general mental ability is positively associated with
income.
§ Hypothesis 2b: general mental ability is positively associated with
educational attainment.
o Main source of core self-evaluations is genetic, but can also be influenced by
intelligence/general mental ability. Intelligence creates ‘functional
competence’/achievement of commonly valued social end, but these aren’t
limited to academic achievements but can vary à Hypothesis 2c: general
mental ability is positively associated with core self-evaluations.
- Direct effects of education + core self-evaluations on income:
o Educational attainment positive influence on income by providing stronger
credentials to signal one’s value in market + by strengthening skills +
knowledge needed to obtain rewards associated with effective performance
à Hypothesis 3: educational attainment is positively associated with income.
o Only one study on core self-evaluations + income directly, but also suggestions
that self-esteem + internal locus of control had positive, nonzero associations
with income à Hypothesis 4: core self-evaluations are positively associated
with income.
- Mediating roles of educational attainment + core self-evaluations:
o Expected partial mediation by education + core self-evaluations for both
attractiveness + intelligence. Previous studies found that at least some of
income differences between attractive/unattractive due to employer +
2
, Laura Heijnen – Organisational Psychology: Performance at Work
customer discrimination, marital success + occupational sorting. BUT: might
also be because more educated + view self more positively.
§ Hypothesis 5a: educational attainment partially mediates relationship
between physical attractiveness + income.
§ Hypothesis 5b: core self-evaluations partially mediate relationship
between physical attractiveness + income.
o Intelligence influences other factors that play role in earning (like
attractiveness), e.g., job performance, employment stability + job knowledge
acquisition. Recent research: evidence that educational attainment mediates
relationship between intelligence + income, and belief that higher core self-
evaluations of intelligent people also contribute to income advantage.
§ Hypothesis 6a: educational attainment partially mediates relationship
between general mental ability + income.
§ Hypothesis 6b: core self-evaluations partially mediate relationship
between general mental ability + income.
- Income, core self-evaluations + financial strain:
o More income = less vulnerable to economic shocks + more able to cover costs
of living = negatively predicting financial strain. BUT: experience of financial
status as stressful might be perception/subjective appraisal based on future
expectations + peer comparisons à Hypothesis 7a: income is negatively
associated with financial strain.
o Transactional theory of stress: appraisals of circumstances as
threatening/challenging are influenced by individual differences like self-
esteem, self-efficacy + sense of control à core self-evaluations influence
attitudes by colouring interpretations of external circumstances + events.
General self-efficacy found to be associated with appraisal o situations as
challenges rather than threats. High in neuroticism = more negative events,
reacting more strongly to events + choosing less effective coping mechanisms
à Hypothesis 7b: core self-evaluations are negatively associated with financial
strain.
o Individuals with positive core self-evaluations should be less likely to
experience financial strains because they earn more, appraise financial
situation more sanguinely + engage in financial behaviours that minimise types
of problems that can lead to stress à Hypothesis 7c: income partially
mediates relationship between core self-evaluations + financial strain.
Method
- Participants + procedure: national survey, English adults between age 25-75 years.
Also special Boston study (429 participants), 3 interviews (6 month-interval) + tests
and photograph taking.
- Measures:
o Financial strains: 4-item scale during time 3 interview.
o Income: measured at time 2.
o Core self-evaluations: 15-item scale, based CSES + Big 5.
o Educational attainment: 12-point scale at time 1, which kind of education.
3
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper lmh. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €3,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 70055 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen