100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten
logo-home
Course Assessment for Working With Client Groups, MSc Forensic Psychology €11,83
In winkelwagen

Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

Course Assessment for Working With Client Groups, MSc Forensic Psychology

 0 keer verkocht
  • Vak
  • Instelling

This essay is from the Working With Client Groups module of the MSc Forensic Psychology taught at the University of Lincoln, UK. This essay was written to assess the evidence and critically evaluate the potential implementation of the ‘Risk, Need and Responsivity’ and/or the Good Lives Model in...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 2 van de 14  pagina's

  • 18 december 2023
  • 14
  • 2019/2020
  • Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
  • Vragen en antwoorden
  • Onbekend
avatar-seller
An Assessment of the Evidence and Potential Implementation of “Risk, Need
and Responsivity” Model and the Good Lives Model in a Medium Secure
Mental Health Service.


This paper has been written to assess the evidence and critically evaluate the potential

implementation of the ‘Risk, Need and Responsivity’ (RNR; Andrews & Bonta, 2006; Bonta

& Hoge, 1990) and/or the Good Lives Model (GLM; Ward, 2002) in a medium secure

forensic psychiatric hospital. Currently there is no formal model to base psychological

interventions and treatment upon, resulting in an inconsistent approach to treatment. Hence,

this paper will suggest using one model as the basis for all interventions to ensure continuity

and reliability in treatment throughout the hospital, as well as confirming all staff and patient

expectations with regards to treatment interventions.

The aim for this paper is to conclude whether RNR or the GLM should be used as the

basis model for psychological interventions and treatment within the new acute admission

ward and the remaining hospital wards. In addition to this, plans for implementation of the

chosen model will be outlined including staff requirements, as well as how any results from

treatment can be recorded to ensure best practice is maintained.




Overview of RNR and GLM

Before evaluation for implementation can be made, a brief outline of each model is

needed to determine the type of client each model is best suited for, along with how each is

best implemented. Firstly, the “Risk, Needs and Responsivity” model (Andrews & Bonta,

2006) is based upon three principles: the risk principle being the first which states that

criminal behaviour can be reliably predicted, providing need for evidence-based risk

instruments to manage and reduce risk (Bonta & Andrews, 2007). RNR proposes that this

, reduction can occur when the level of treatment is in proportion to the level of risk, whereby

the higher risk offender receives more intensive treatment. The need principle highlights the

importance of criminogenic needs in the creation and implementation of treatment plans.

Criminogenic needs present in the form of two types of risk factors: dynamic and static, with

both having a direct link to offending behaviour. Dynamic risk factors which can be reduced

and removed, while static risk factors are unmoveable by treatment and can only increase or

be maintained. Finally, the responsivity principle explains how the treatment should be

provided. This principle can be split into two sections: general and specific responsivity. The

former incorporating the use of cognitive social learning methods to teach new prosocial

behaviours to replace the offending and the latter to regulate the cognitive behavioural

intervention taking into account individual differences that can affect treatment, such as

learning style (Bonta & Andrews, 2007). Thus, treatment should be tailored to fit each

individual based on their personal strengths and socio-personality factors to maximise

attention and therefore learning.

Research has claimed the RNR model to be successful (Newsome & Cullen, 2017)

with empirical evidence to support this (see: Andrews & Bonta, 2010; Smith, Gendreau &

Swartz, 2009). For example, based on tests of the need principle in RNR, successfully

addressing criminogenic needs during treatment intervention is associated with an average

19% difference in recidivism rates (Bonta & Andrews, 2007). Further to this, if adherence to

the general responsivity principle is examined, such as the use of cognitive behavioural

methods during intervention, there is an average 23% difference in recidivism (Andrews &

Bonta, 2006). In addition to this, Bonta and Andrews (2007) claim that any treatment

intervention that does not adhere to any of the risk, need or responsivity principles and

therefore target non-criminogenic needs using non-cognitive-behavioural techniques, are in

fact criminogenic in themselves. This is a particular concern in residential settings such as

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Direct to-the-point

Direct to-the-point

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper stuffnobodyteaches. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €11,83. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 65630 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Begin nu gratis
€11,83
  • (0)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd