100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Summary Notes lectures & readings, Introduction to research methods - Security Studies Year 1 €8,49   In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Summary Notes lectures & readings, Introduction to research methods - Security Studies Year 1

 14 keer bekeken  0 keer verkocht

This document contains a complete summary of the notes of all the lectures and readings required to study for Introduction to Research methods, given in Block 4 of security studies year 1. Good luck!

Voorbeeld 4 van de 62  pagina's

  • 21 december 2023
  • 62
  • 2022/2023
  • Samenvatting
Alle documenten voor dit vak (8)
avatar-seller
jhbos
Lecture 1
- Social science and social scientists are interconnected with society
→ What is social science research?
- to search for an answer to a question
- to extend knowledge, unravel mysteries, build theories
- verify facts
→ based on a scientific method

science= collecting systemic knowledge that is capable of resulting in a correct prediction or
reliable outcome
scientific method = seek to explain events of nature in a reproducible way and is reliable
(repeatability) and valid (are we measuring what we were supposed to measure?)

1. The goal is inference → generating new knowledge about something we don’t know on
the basis of something we can observe/we know
2. The procedures are public / transmissible / cumulative
3. Conclusions are uncertain / Falsifiable
4. The method!

Pseudo = false

The importance of research methods:
Generally:
• Being able to conduct good scientific research to understand various (safety and security)
issues/problems and find solutions
• Developing a critical eye And
On a practical note:
• Developing skills to understand the (empirical) literature in other classes
• Developing skills for your bachelor/master thesis, but also beyond…
Doing research:
1. Research topic
2. Literature review
3. Research design
4. Data collection
5. Data analysis
6. reporting

Research design
1. Research philosophy. 4 worldviews:
- Positivism: believe that there is a single reality which can be measured and known. A
theory/observation is always true. Use quantitative methods Eg. if u drop a pen it will
fall
- Interpretivism: believe there is no single reality/truth. It needs to be interpreted. Use
qualitative methods to find multiple realities.

, - Pragmatism: believe reality is constantly renegotiated/debated and interpreted and
therefore the best method to use is the one that solves the problem. Combi of two
above
- Critical: paradigm situates research in social justice issues to address political, social
and economic issues. Hte seek to be the voice of the marginalised ones.

● ontology= what constitutes reality and how can we understand its existence ?
● epistemology= what constitutes valid knowledge and how can we obtain it?
● methodology= how do we go about finding it out? {insert table from powerpoint slide}

2. Research approach
Deduction → from theory to confirmation of the theory
Induction → from observations to theory

3. Mono/mixed methods
→ qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods

4. Time horizon
How much time to do research?

5. Data collections
How to collect data? And how to analyse? → Eg. surveys, case study, ethnography


Lecture 2
Methods

Interviews & focus groups: strengths and challenges

Interviewing = a conversation that has a structure… the purpose is to obtain knowledge
- to obtain knowledge: align your topic with the right respondents, the right questions
and the right responses!
→ gain trust first, not too heavy questions
→ strive to gain knowledge of their conditions and believes → could explain certain
actions

Types of interviews:
- the structured interview → close to survey
- the semi-structured interview → open-ended questions and no predefined options for
the respondent
- in-depth interviews → no predefined structure & provide insight on topics that need to
be investigated in a more structured manner & discover new points of view

,Interviews vs focus groups
→ identifying group norms & discovering variety within a group, observe group interaction
→ snowballing of ideas = enables students to initially think about their own response to a
question, then converse with just one other person, and then join together with other pairs to
enable a wider discussion
→ group think & dominant persons
→ more difficult to address sensitive topics
→ difficult to guarantee confidentiality & to organize & to generalize

Case study and comparative method: strengths and challenges
What is a case study & what is it good for?
- Case = a spatially delimited phenomenon observed at a single point in time or over
some period of time
- Case study = intensive study of a single case (for the purpose of understanding a
larger class of similar cases, i.e. a population)
- can be either inductive or deductive
Comparative study = the study of a larger number of cases
→ why do we compare?
- to explain an outcome identify broad patterns/regularities or relationships among
variables, test/refine theory and make predictions

Process tracing method
→ single case research method that can be used to make within case inferences about
presence/absence of causal mechanisms
→ enables strong inferences about causal relationship between X and Y
→ links dependent and independent variable
- one part will lead to action in the second one, which will lead to outcome
- connects causes and consequences
→ focus is on studying causal mechanisms using in-depth single case study

Process tracing tests for causal
inference
→ Straw-in-the-Wind = unusual piece of
evidence
→ Hoop = about the area and place of
the crime
→ Smoking-Gun =
→ Doubly Decisive =

Method of elimination = used by sherlock
holmes → eliminating possible variables

, Experiments
● Module: Sampling

→ a deliberate test of a causal proposition, typically with random assignment to conditions
→ investigators design experiments to evaluate the causal impacts of potentially informative
explanatory variables

What is a cause?
→ something is a cause if changing it - eliminating it, adding it, or varying its level - would
affect the outcome (keeping the rest of the system constant
→ causes are difference makers. A change in the causal factor (independent variable) leads
to a change in the dependent variable (see slide)

Causality and the logic of experiments
→ causality is inferred by comparing two scenarios in which only the
suspected/hypothesized cause changes while everything else remains the same
→ since we have no access to parallel realities, how can we get to scenarios in which (only)
the hypothesized cause changes?
→ in other words, how to have access to factual and counterfactual versions of the world?

What is a treatment/manipulation?
→ manipulations are deliberate interventions developed to create variation in a putative
causal variable
→ in experiments we manipulate the independent variable

How are experiments different from other research designs?
→ experiments work because random assignment to treatment and control conditions tends
to produce groups that are comparable in all respects but one - the variable manipulated by
the researcher

The logic of experiments
- importance of theory and deriving of hypotheses
- addressing the issue of causality: does change in X cause a change in Y
- standardization: the same intervention (X) applied to everybody in a treatment group
- randomization: random assignment to treatment and control condition
(between-subjects or within-subject design)
- replicability

Survey experiments (Sniderman 2011)
- basic idea: the method combines experiments and survey
- involves experimental intervention in the course of a survey
- this intervention is a measure of the influence of an independent variable of interest:
manipulated experimentally
- participants are assigned randomly to treatment condition(s) and control condition

→ typically involve the creation of experimental scenarios by verbal and/or graphic
narrations in which experimental stimuli are embedded and systematically manipulated

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper jhbos. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €8,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 78861 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€8,49
  • (0)
  Kopen