100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
European Constitutional Law and Fundamental Rights Lecture Notes €15,49   In winkelwagen

College aantekeningen

European Constitutional Law and Fundamental Rights Lecture Notes

 9 keer bekeken  0 keer verkocht

Lecture notes for the course European Constitutional Law and Fundamental Rights. This course is a 12 credit mandatory course of the Master European Union Law.

Voorbeeld 4 van de 60  pagina's

  • 19 januari 2024
  • 60
  • 2023/2024
  • College aantekeningen
  • Thomas vandamme
  • Alle colleges
Alle documenten voor dit vak (1)
avatar-seller
smahd
Lectures: European Constitutional Law & Fundamental Rights


Week 1: The European Constitution in Crisis?
The EU “Constitution”
Does the EU have a constitution?
● Different views of what is a constitution
○ Functional
- A set of rules describing how power should be exercised
- In this context, the EU does have a constitution → Treaties


○ Normative
- Does it describe how powers should be exercised?
- Is there a set of rules that is based on: a) Separation of powers
- ART 4-6 TFEU → Vertical
(between EU & MS’s)
- ART 13 TEU → Horizontal
(between institutions)
b) Democracy
- ART 10(1) (2) TEU
- Voting in EP
- MS Parliaments
c) Fundamental Rights
- ART 6 TEU, Charter (binding)
- Accession ECHR
d) Rule of Law?
- ART 2 TEU, ART 19 TEU
- Values of the EU
- Access to independent Court
that ensures the law is applied
- CJEU observes the law
● Position of the CJEU clear → Les Verts (para 23)
○ “Treaties are the constitutional charter of the Union”
- How power must be exercised


The EU Constitution & Federal(?) Nature of the EU
The EU constitution constitutes an entity that is heavily interlinked with its component parts (MS’s)
- EU is boss over MS’s but also MS’s are boss over the EU


EU & Federalism
System based on self rule & shared rule with at least 2 levels of government who each operate on
the basis of their constitution → The EU cannot be a state

,Federal Origins
● Foedus → Contract (between whom?)
○ International Contract between sovereign states
- States as contracting parties → Would lead to peace


Federalism Today
● US Tradition (American constitution) → Splitting the atom of sovereignty
○ A middle ground between national & international law
- You can have 2 sovereigns in the same territory at the same time
- Citizens can be subject to both sovereigns


● The European Tradition
○ Sovereignty cannot be split → Indivisible sovereignty
- Federation is either a federal state or a creature of international law not
being a state


Critique based on Democratic Constitutionalism
● In Federalism
○ Peoples, sovereigns & constitutions may co-exist in the same territory


● Democratic constitutionalism → No European Demos
○ No European constitutions → No federal source of authority
- Only one people → Only one sovereignty & one constitution


How do we get out of this deadlock?
● Solution: EU is sui generis?
○ Not international law or national law → One of a kind
- Does not help us understand what it is


Dual vs Cooperative Federalism
1) Dual federations
- Strict separation of legislative & executive power (Vertical & horizontal)
- Emphasis not on “shared rule”
- Ex: Belgium, US


2) Cooperative federations
- Separation of powers less strict
- States are actors in the centre of power (states part of power at centre)
- Legislative, executive & judicial functions are “shared”
- Ex: Germany, EU → MS’s part of EU legislature

,Cooperative federalism in the EU
● Shared institutions
○ National & EU functions → Heads of state
● Shared democracy
○ ART 10 TEU
● Shared judiciary
○ All courts in the EU → Have an MS court & EU court
- Ensure the rule of EU law is guaranteed → PRP


The EU “Constitution” & the Rule of Law
● Rule of Law → Access to independent courts
○ Rule of law is an essential value → Because the EU started as a peace project
1) EU institutions must comply with the rule of law
- ART 2
2) Member States must also comply with the rule of law
- ART 49 TEU → Condition for accession


● Only one Court responsible for interpreting the validity of EU law → CJEU
○ Les Verts → “EEC is a community based on the rule of law”
- Whether or not you could start a case against the EP
- The rule of law is “supra-constitutional” → EP had to adhere as well
- Went above the importance of the Treaty


● Rule of law in legal theory
○ Minimalist (Formalist) view
- Does the RoL demand public power to be legally circumscribed, predictable
& excercised through clear procedural requirements & reviewable by courts?
- Rule by law Ex: Rosa Parks is wrong → Rule of bad law


○ Normative view
- Does the RoL also demand public power to conform to substantive
standards of democracy and human rights?
- There should be limitations

, What does the EU follow? Formal vs Substantive Rule of Law
● Black Letter Lawyer → Minimalist view
○ ART 2 Rule of law is next to fundamental rights & democracy


The Rule of Law Crisis in the EU & The Instruments to Address the Rule of Law
● The Rule of Law in the EU Member States → Crisis
○ EU developed tools to make sure the Rule of law is applied
1) ART 49 TEU → Accession
- Only states complying can accede to Rule of law
- Copenhagen Criteria
2) ART 7 TEU → Treaty of Amsterdam
- MS’s rights can be frozen/Suspended
- Ex: Voting rights
- Triggered for the first time by Poland & Hungary (not completed)
- Veto in favour of each other → Architectural flaw of ART 7
3) ART 47 Charter
- Right to independent court
- Limitation: Applies to the MS only when they apply EU law
4) ART 19(1)TEU (new)
- MS shall provide remedies to ensure sufficient legal protection in the
fields covered by EU law
5) Structured Dialogue


6) Power of the purse
- Financial
- Hit the MS where it hurts most → Money!!!


The “Power of the Purse”
● Conditionality Regulation → Links the access to EU funds to complying with the rule of law
○ Your judiciary must be independent
○ European Strcutural Investment Funds (ESIF)
○ Powerful tool to enforce the rule of law → Regulation is controversial
- Poland, Hungary against it
- Abusing the power of the purse?
- Can you buy the rule of law?
● Has limitations
○ Need to make a connection between the rule of law & the sound functioning of the
budget

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper smahd. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €15,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 67474 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€15,49
  • (0)
  Kopen