College aantekeningen
Summary of all lectures of Science of Happiness () 2023/2024
- Instelling
- Universiteit Utrecht (UU)
This is a summary of all lectures (1 tm 8) of Science of Happiness
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 4 van de 62 pagina's
Voorbeeld 4 van de 62 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Verkoper
Volgen
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Science of HappinessLecture 1: why happiness deserves scien8fic interest
Nega8vity bias: bad is stronger than good
- People are more distressed by the loss of $50 than they are made happy by finding
$50
- Nega;ve informa;on receives more a>en;on and is processed more thoroughly than
posi;ve informa;on
- Evolu;onary explana;on: humans a>uned to preven;ng bad things thrive more than
those oriented toward maximizing good things
- A person who ignores the danger of fire may not live to see the next day
“Evolu;on doesn’t want you to be happy or sa;sfied. We’re supposed to survive and
reproduce”. “Our DNA prefers to keep us forever anxious about poten;al threats and in need
of new rewards that will never quite sa;sfy us. Our biological self is naturally unhappy.” “A
huge happiness and posi;ve thinking industry has helped to create the fantasy that
happiness is a realis;c goal. Chasing the happiness dream is a very American concept,
exported to the rest of the world through popular culture. Unfortunately, this has helped to
create an expecta;on that real life stubbornly refuses to deliver.”
Psychological research has focused more on understanding ‘bad things’
à Un;l 2000, when the posi;ve psychology movement was launched
Typical example:
à Posits that posi;ve emo;ons may broaden people's
momentary thought-ac;on repertoires, which in turn
help to build their personal resources (physical, social,
and psychological)
à Two people, one who tends to be nega;ve and
another who tends to be posi;ve, face a health treat
(Taylor et al., 2000)
à The person with nega;ve emo;ons panics and
suffers from ill physical health
à The person with posi;ve emo;ons stays calm and engages in health protec;ve behaviors
and deals with the health threat appropriately à with posi;ve health outcomes as a result
,Government wants us to be happy:
- New-Zealand’s ‘wellbeing budget’
- Bhutan’s Happiness Index
- Welsh Wellbeing of Future Genera;ons Act
- OECD Be>er Life Index
- United Na;ons World Happiness Report
Benefits of a happy popula8on:
• Happier people…
- Are more produc;ve
- Are healthier and live longer
- Contribute more to society
- Have be>er social rela;onships (e.g., fewer divorces)
Science of Happiness: focus on the antecedents and consequences of happiness
• Scien;fic ques;ons rela;ng to happiness:
- Do circumstances and living condi;ons ma>er?
- Do material condi;ons have an influence?
- Is happiness your own responsibility?
- Can you increase your level of happiness?
- Should government create condi;ons that make you happy?
What is happiness (defini8on)?
- “A state of well-being and contentment”
- “The experience of joy, contentment, or posi;ve well-being, combined with a sense
that one’s life is good, meaningful, and worthwhile” (Lyubomirsky ,2008)
, - “Good mental states, including all of the various evalua;ons, posi;ve and nega;ve,
that people make of their lives and the affec;ve reac;ons of people to their
experiences” (OECD, 2013)
- “Happiness is a feeling of pleasure and posi;vity.” (in simple words)
Is happiness an elusive concept?
• JINGLE: the very same terms refer to different underlying concep;ons: happiness
refers to life sa;sfac;on, posi;ve affect, well-being
• JANGLE: different terms are used to describe the very same underlying concep;ons:
happiness, life sa;sfac;on, meaning in life, well-being
Hedonic/subjec8ve well-being as a composite of 3 related but dis8nct facets (tripar8te
model)
• Cogni;ve Life evalua;on – a reflec;ve
assessment on a person’s life or some specific
aspect of it: general sa;sfac;on with life or
domain-specific sa;sfac;on with marriage,
work, friendship, leisure, the weather …
• Posi;ve Affect – person’s feelings or
emo;onal states, typically measured with
reference to a par;cular point in ;me
(momentary): e.g., excited, interested, enthusias;c
• Nega;ve Affect – a person’s feelings or emo;onal states, typically measured with
reference to a par;cular point in ;me (momentary): e.g., nervous, afraid, irritable
Eudaimonic well-being
- Eudaimonia: a sense of meaning and purpose in life, or good psychological
func;oning
- Eudaimonic: actualiza;on of one’s poten;al by fulfilling one’s daimon (true self) ≈
flourishing
à As different from
- Hedonic/subjec;ve well-being: with a focus on affect (maximiza;on of pleasure &
minimiza;on of pain) and cogni;on
A bit of consensus and (quite) a bit of controversy
• Consensus: two main approaches:
, - Hedonic/subjec;ve well-being: sa;sfac;on with life + presence of momentary
posi;ve affect + absence of nega;ve affect
- Eudaimonic: purpose and meaning in life
• Controversy:
- What is the best indicator of ‘happiness’: hedonic or eudaimonic measures? But note
that in policy making focus lies on hedonic/subjec;ve wellbeing
- If and how do people account for their living condi;ons (financial and immaterial)
when repor;ng on happiness?
Alterna8ve measures of happiness (besides self-report):
- Duchenne smiling (with your eyes as a genuine indicator of posi;ve affect, unfakable)
- Genuine smiles in college yearbook pictures predicted marital sa;sfac;on decades
later
- Recording behaviors that involve gra;tude or acts of kindness
- Note that disciplines different from psychology determine happiness not by
examining subjec;ve experiences but by mapping condi;ons that will contribute to
happiness
Is it easy to tell if someone is happy?
- People in the Midwest of the US think people living in California will be happier than
themselves – while in fact they are equally happy
- Focus on the weather while sunshine doesn’t make you happy (Schkade & Kahneman,
1998; Finland case)
- Happiness is a biased judgment: People es;mate their own happiness level by (too
much) focus on one par;cular issue (typically something they don’t have): an easily
observed and dis;nc;ve element
Focus on self-report:
- Despite disadvantages of self-report (social desirability, problems associated with
introspec;on),
- People are able to report on their feelings in metrics
- Aqer all, happiness is about subjec;ve well-being à so why not ask people
themselves?
- Even a single item on sa;sfac;on with life (Cantril’s ladder) produces reliable scores,
comparable with mul;ple item scales
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper isa1000. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,47. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 67474 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen